It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 41  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
BigW72 wrote:
doug - evergreen park wrote:
So, if there is baseball in 2020...do you guys think there is a possibility of attendance in the playoffs?

I mean, it'd be like 5,000 people, two at most together, 3 seats apart from the next pair, two rows between....type of situation?

I doesn't appear to me that either side is highly motivated to salvage any kind of a season. This all starts with the owners using this as cover for screwing the players out of money.

For Playoffs, we'll have to see what the NFL does. If their seats are empty, MLB won't have much leverage to open up stadiums.

Both sides are going to leave a whole lot of money on the table....I can't fault the players here. The MLB proposal is way too different from the current CBA in terms of rules / game format. This should all be about splitting what's left of the money and save game changes / format to a the new CBA. They just can't help themselves from being pigs.


Both sides want to play ball, you have to take that indifference stance for negotiations. I believe it gets done.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2020 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Look at this bullshit. If this is true just cancel the season. But of course it is not.


_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2020 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16474
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Those "loss" numbers are more likely "missed profit opportunity".

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2020 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
It was nice to see Artie Moreno gut staff to save a few bucks.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
conns7901 wrote:


Well at least it was a difficult decision... They can now tell their utility and landlords they cant pay their bills and it was a difficult decision.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
This MLB thing is pathetic. Get back to work. Don't kill the golden goose.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Those "loss" numbers are more likely "missed profit opportunity".


Yup. Just like Amazon saying they have paid out over $800 million in overtime pay and raises, without contexting that figure with profits.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Time for that rarity of bipartisan Congressional consensus, to revoke MLB's antitrust exemption.

I still think that the TV networks have a stern word with both sides and explain what happens if the RSNs fold because there is no advertising revenue for live events, and ESPN and Fox decide that MLB is an unreliable partner. Guys like Mookie Betts and Kris Bryant have several hundred million reasons each to get a deal done that preserves a shred of their free agent money, and guys like Ian Happ or Leury Garcia haven't made enough to have comfortable retirement money. They need to play. Pitchers, on the other hand, why risk hurting your arm?

And if the Latino Congressmen don't start screaming about minor leaguers coming here and getting the shaft, they have lost their minds. Oh wait, MLBPA doesn't give a shit about minor leaguers, they don't pay dues.

Illinois takes roughly 5% of player salary as income tax. At a conservative estimate of $240M for the combined 25 man rosters playing that day, that is $1.5M/game in salary, or $75k a game in taxes. With no fans. Lori should be having a fit.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Time for that rarity of bipartisan Congressional consensus, to revoke MLB's antitrust exemption.


I said that when the Astros were trying to kill the minors and I got yelled at. Of course, now the bat plague did the Astros' work for them.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This MLB thing is pathetic. Get back to work. Don't kill the golden goose.



You'd tell me to get my head fucked if I tried to get you to work for 30% of out negotiated contract.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
312player wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This MLB thing is pathetic. Get back to work. Don't kill the golden goose.



You'd tell me to get my head fucked if I tried to get you to work for 30% of out negotiated contract.


Yep.

Especially after you already agreed to a deal to take less.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
312player wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This MLB thing is pathetic. Get back to work. Don't kill the golden goose.



You'd tell me to get my head fucked if I tried to get you to work for 30% of out negotiated contract.


Yep.

Especially after you already agreed to a deal to take less.



We all want baseball back but you can't give these greedy fucks an inch, they'll take a kilometer.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Curious Hair wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Time for that rarity of bipartisan Congressional consensus, to revoke MLB's antitrust exemption.


I said that when the Astros were trying to kill the minors and I got yelled at. Of course, now the bat plague did the Astros' work for them.

Not by me. The AFL, ABA, and WHA all made the surviving leagues stronger.

Let Amazon run a 16 week, 16 team king of the hill tournament at four sites around the US. Offer it free on Prime Video. Best of 3 a week, so you only need 3-4 starters.

MLB is going to kill itself from mutual greed unless competition comes in to give them something to fight against.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 26, 2020 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Time for that rarity of bipartisan Congressional consensus, to revoke MLB's antitrust exemption.


I said that when the Astros were trying to kill the minors and I got yelled at. Of course, now the bat plague did the Astros' work for them.

Not by me. The AFL, ABA, and WHA all made the surviving leagues stronger.

Let Amazon run a 16 week, 16 team king of the hill tournament at four sites around the US. Offer it free on Prime Video. Best of 3 a week, so you only need 3-4 starters.

MLB is going to kill itself from mutual greed unless competition comes in to give them something to fight against.

I don't get this mutual greed thing. Players have a contract and MLB doesn't want to honor it.

Just open up the park to fans. They'll come. I'll come. Owners should grow a backbone. Bam. Fixed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 7:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Terry's Peeps wrote:
312player wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
This MLB thing is pathetic. Get back to work. Don't kill the golden goose.



You'd tell me to get my head fucked if I tried to get you to work for 30% of out negotiated contract.


Yep.

Especially after you already agreed to a deal to take less.

And that was only two months ago. But seems seldom mentioned.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
I don't get this mutual greed thing. Players have a contract and MLB doesn't want to honor it.
The contract is only if games are played. MLB could cancel the whole season and the players get $0 and the owners save money.

It's a messed up situation all around but when the MLBPA openly brags about how great it is that they avoided "revenue sharing" then things like this happen. Revenue sharing is good for both sides and would have made this much simpler.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
I don't get this mutual greed thing. Players have a contract and MLB doesn't want to honor it.
The contract is only if games are played. MLB could cancel the whole season and the players get $0 and the owners save money.

It's a messed up situation all around but when the MLBPA openly brags about how great it is that they avoided "revenue sharing" then things like this happen. Revenue sharing is good for both sides and would have made this much simpler.


If owners are saving money by not having a season they should cancel. They said paying zero salaries they would still lose 2 billion this year.

I have a feeling they are lying though.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
conns7901 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
I don't get this mutual greed thing. Players have a contract and MLB doesn't want to honor it.
The contract is only if games are played. MLB could cancel the whole season and the players get $0 and the owners save money.

It's a messed up situation all around but when the MLBPA openly brags about how great it is that they avoided "revenue sharing" then things like this happen. Revenue sharing is good for both sides and would have made this much simpler.


If owners are saving money by not having a season they should cancel. They said paying zero salaries they would still lose 2 billion this year.

I have a feeling they are lying though.


Of course.

That's why players asked owners to open the books.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
I don't get this mutual greed thing. Players have a contract and MLB doesn't want to honor it.
The contract is only if games are played. MLB could cancel the whole season and the players get $0 and the owners save money.

It's a messed up situation all around but when the MLBPA openly brags about how great it is that they avoided "revenue sharing" then things like this happen. Revenue sharing is good for both sides and would have made this much simpler.


If owners are saving money by not having a season they should cancel. They said paying zero salaries they would still lose 2 billion this year.

I have a feeling they are lying though.


Of course.

That's why players asked owners to open the books.
I think you need to agree to revenue sharing to get that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Players should stay firm. Owners can lose a shit ton of money(by canceling the season) or half a shit ton of money by playing. Players also have an ace in the hole as they are taking "health risks". And they will mention it if owners get all propagandist in their portrayal of "selfish" players


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Players should stay firm. Owners can lose a shit ton of money(by canceling the season) or half a shit ton of money by playing. Players also have an ace in the hole as they are taking "health risks". And they will mention it if owners get all propagandist in their portrayal of "selfish" players
I'm not sure it really matters for the owners in MLB. It's reported that 30% of total revenue for MLB comes from ticket sales.

If total revenue was $100 a year.
So, in a half year, it goes down to $50 a year.
It goes down to $35 a year with no fans when you subtract that 30% of ticket sales.
If players were to get $25 of that $35 that leaves $10 of the original $100.
That also doesn't include decreased advertising and RSN fees if that is part of the contract.

The players taking $50 out of every $100 is a lot different than the players taking $25 out of every $35 since the ticket sales are gone.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
The thing is the players would be better off with true revenue sharing and a salary cap and floor. Teams are only spending around 40% of revenue on salaries. Half the league is tanking at any one time. They hold players down as long as possible and then when they reach free agency at 30 or 31, most are told they are too old to sign big deals.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Players should stay firm. Owners can lose a shit ton of money(by canceling the season) or half a shit ton of money by playing. Players also have an ace in the hole as they are taking "health risks". And they will mention it if owners get all propagandist in their portrayal of "selfish" players
I'm not sure it really matters for the owners in MLB. It's reported that 30% of total revenue for MLB comes from ticket sales.

If total revenue was $100 a year.
So, in a half year, it goes down to $50 a year.
It goes down to $35 a year with no fans when you subtract that 30% of ticket sales.
If players were to get $25 of that $35 that leaves $10 of the original $100.
That also doesn't include decreased advertising and RSN fees if that is part of the contract.

The players taking $50 out of every $100 is a lot different than the players taking $25 out of every $35 since the ticket sales are gone.

There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.
The players are getting a good amount of money in the playoffs too. There is no guarantee fans will be in the stadiums by the playoffs. The tv deals also may want money back.

The owners aren't going to choose to start the season if they are likely to lose more money than they would by not playing at all. It sucks for the players but it's just how business works. If the players were open to revenue sharing then it is a different discussion.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.
The players are getting a good amount of money in the playoffs too. There is no guarantee fans will be in the stadiums by the playoffs. The tv deals also may want money back.

The owners aren't going to choose to start the season if they are likely to lose more money than they would by not playing at all. It sucks for the players but it's just how business works. If the players were open to revenue sharing then it is a different discussion.

so you're saying the owners won't cave?

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.
The players are getting a good amount of money in the playoffs too. There is no guarantee fans will be in the stadiums by the playoffs. The tv deals also may want money back.

The owners aren't going to choose to start the season if they are likely to lose more money than they would by not playing at all. It sucks for the players but it's just how business works. If the players were open to revenue sharing then it is a different discussion.

Oh well. Sorry owners. MLBPA has a nice sized strike fund the can use in this situation.

Players have a contract. Abide by it or cancel. Guess what? Owners won't cancel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.
The players are getting a good amount of money in the playoffs too. There is no guarantee fans will be in the stadiums by the playoffs. The tv deals also may want money back.

The owners aren't going to choose to start the season if they are likely to lose more money than they would by not playing at all. It sucks for the players but it's just how business works. If the players were open to revenue sharing then it is a different discussion.

so you're saying the owners won't cave?
I don't think today was a take it or leave it offer but I don't see the owners playing baseball with the original agreement of it just being a prorated salary based on the number of games played.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 27, 2020 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
City of Fools wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
There will be expanded playoffs with fans. Extra TV money also. Players want their per game money. It's contractual. Owners can make it up in the playoffs.
The players are getting a good amount of money in the playoffs too. There is no guarantee fans will be in the stadiums by the playoffs. The tv deals also may want money back.

The owners aren't going to choose to start the season if they are likely to lose more money than they would by not playing at all. It sucks for the players but it's just how business works. If the players were open to revenue sharing then it is a different discussion.

so you're saying the owners won't cave?

Like a shoddily built coal mine


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1229 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 41  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group