I'll do some research:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct- ... clnk&gl=usQuote:
Which players the Hawks would have to give to get Lindros is pure speculation. They have grouped different offers, trying not to disrupt their structure too much. Considered to be among those offered are goalie Ed Belfour, defenseman Steve Smith, right wing Steve Larmer, center Brent Sutter, plus young prospects Dean McAmmond and Karl Dykhuis, the Hawks` No. 1 draft picks the last two years. And the draft picks the Hawks surrender probably all would be first-rounders.
The other factor in giving three to four first-round picks for Lindros is that it would end the Hawks` bid to reacquire defenseman Dave Manson from Edmonton. Manson is a free agent whom the Hawks will try to sign for as much as $800,000, but they would have to give up two first-round picks if the Oilers don`t match that salary offer.
The only Hawks that Keenan has told Quebec General Manager Pierre Page he can`t have are center Jeremy Roenick and defenseman Chris Chelios.
As far as how much money Hawks owner Bill Wirtz will have to pay Quebec in addition to players and picks, the estimates start at $15 million.
''The money depends on how many players you give them,'' Pulford said.
Wirtz was
not paying $15MM just for the right to sign Lindros, who Pulford also said didn't deserve to make more than Roenick (fair).
I think the Hawks would have come out better than the Flyers did in only losing Belfour, Larmer, Steve Smith, Brent Sutter, McCammond, and four first-rounders. The Hawks didn't really hit big on the next four first-round picks, which the Nordiques, generally a fairly savvy organization even with the mandate to draft heavily from Quebec, probably would have made better use of. However, there's no Peter Forsberg in that package, and I don't think anyone they could have drafted mid-first from '92-'95 would have been close to Peter Forsberg. Maybe in '94 they draft Patrik Elias where the Hawks took Ethan Moreau? Doubtful.
The biggest problem I see is that in Sutter, Smith, and Larmer, you have a great deal of star power. With next to no revenue sharing and a lousy local TV deal (largely sabotaged by the Canadiens, who pretty much ran NHL TV in Canada through a separate subsidiary of Molson), would the Nordiques have had the money to pay them? Would it have taken more cash in the trade to do so? Would
they have reported to Quebec City?
_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.