badrogue17 wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Why would he?
Exactly .
All opinions are not equally valid or informed.
Someone says the Earth is flat? They're a moron. It's not enlightened to give it credence.
I hear Bernise naturally going off right now and read earlier comments here as well as listened to the Bree's comments aren't people getting it wrong generally?
For instance, Bernsie says the Kap protest was kneeling during the anthem against police brutality, BLM full stop. It was not in any way against the flag and troops etc. I see that completely and it has been discussed over and over.
So if Brees says his view of the anthem is one way and explains how he feels about the matter as well as includes he understands civil rights matters might view differently whys is it wrong.
I did not Brees say Kap is wrong and and was going to act to get him or anyone to not do it. He said he strongly disagrees. Isn't that just the definition of difference of opinion?
Brees doesn't get to decide why Kap's doing what he's doing.
It's not like the reasons Kap did what he did were ambiguous or involved difficult reasoning.
Brees' statement makes it crystal clear he's more worried about
'murica than he is how no small number of American citizens are mistreated. Anything said beyond that is filler and folly and, possibly, an outright lie.
Nor does the mob get to decide what Brees said is wrong (though they did ) and bully him into an apology .
First off, it's not a 'mob' ... apparently your interest in a good faith discussion is lacking.
Secondly, yes they can.
If I say 'hello' and tip my cap, and a number of folks up and decide my real message is 'fuck you', that's flat wrong.
At that point, a restatement of my meaning for saying 'hello' should be given and they in turn should be given the chance to correct their interpretation. If not, they deserve any ridicule they've thus invited by taking something clear and purposefully muddying it up with a falsehood. Their opinion is invalidated.
Somebody interested in dialogue and possibly reaching an understanding doesn't get on twitter and act like a jerkoff, he talks to Kap privately - maybe they still disagree, but they've discussed it like men without treating the other like a jerk.
Brees did what he did b/c he's looking to put himself over with the troglodytes that think the balcks should know their place. His statement was based on a demonstrably false narrative and his intent was entirely self-centered.
Pretending to find something to respect in either of the previous two sentences is, at the very least, sad.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
