It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 288 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 6:47 am
Posts: 1211
pizza_Place: Bennys
JustAGayGuy wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
I'm a Mitch hater but I think the Bears would still be 5-1 with him in there.

Trubsky doesn't get that Kmet TD pass in the right place.

Mitch doesn’t hit any of the passes in the soft spots of the zone that Foles has. I can’t recall the last Bears QB that has been able to get it over a defender and in front of the deep cover regularly. There is very little you can do with an inaccurate QB other than run him until he gets hurt.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mulli is Howard Stern in his prime compared to Haugh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 6:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
The Man wrote:
JustAGayGuy wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
I'm a Mitch hater but I think the Bears would still be 5-1 with him in there.

Trubsky doesn't get that Kmet TD pass in the right place.

Mitch doesn’t hit any of the passes in the soft spots of the zone that Foles has. I can’t recall the last Bears QB that has been able to get it over a defender and in front of the deep cover regularly. There is very little you can do with an inaccurate QB other than run him until he gets hurt.
Foles isn't any more accurate than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Foles played really poorly yesterday.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
There are few games the Bears enter where they are winning the QB matchup. It's going to be that way for at least another 1.5 years.

We are essentially back to the Lovie days of having to play field position battles, hoping to win the defensive and special teams phases of the game, with every game being close in both wins and losses.

This was acceptable with Lovie because he was a defensive genius. It's an indictment of Nagy, even as he sits here at 24-13.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
There are few games the Bears enter where they are winning the QB matchup. It's going to be that way for at least another 1.5 years.

We are essentially back to the Lovie days of having to play field position battles, hoping to win the defensive and special teams phases of the game, with every game being close in both wins and losses.

This was acceptable with Lovie because he was a defensive genius. It's an indictment of Nagy, even as he sits here at 24-13.


Agreed however now you do have a QB that while not super-skilled does bring some value with his ability to diagnose defenses correctly, progress through reads, and hit the right man. We've now seen Foles make big throws based on his diagnosis alone of the coverage for three straight weeks. I'm not sure if we've ever seen that? The defense is winning games but Foles' throw to Montgomery in the TB game is an example of his value. That's value Trubinsky never brought.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
There are few games the Bears enter where they are winning the QB matchup. It's going to be that way for at least another 1.5 years.

We are essentially back to the Lovie days of having to play field position battles, hoping to win the defensive and special teams phases of the game, with every game being close in both wins and losses.

This was acceptable with Lovie because he was a defensive genius. It's an indictment of Nagy, even as he sits here at 24-13.


Agreed however now you do have a QB that while not super-skilled does bring some value with his ability to diagnose defenses correctly, progress through reads, and hit the right man. We've now seen Foles make big throws based on his diagnosis alone of the coverage for three straight weeks. I'm not sure if we've ever seen that? The defense is winning games but Foles' throw to Montgomery in the TB game is an example of his value. That's value Trubinsky never brought.
Did you miss the Detroit game this year?

You are so negative about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky you are ignoring subpar performances by Foles. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is done in Chicago. Are you willing to go in with Foles as the starter next year and be happy? He better play a lot better for that to seem like a good idea.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
There are few games the Bears enter where they are winning the QB matchup. It's going to be that way for at least another 1.5 years.

We are essentially back to the Lovie days of having to play field position battles, hoping to win the defensive and special teams phases of the game, with every game being close in both wins and losses.

This was acceptable with Lovie because he was a defensive genius. It's an indictment of Nagy, even as he sits here at 24-13.


Agreed however now you do have a QB that while not super-skilled does bring some value with his ability to diagnose defenses correctly, progress through reads, and hit the right man. We've now seen Foles make big throws based on his diagnosis alone of the coverage for three straight weeks. I'm not sure if we've ever seen that? The defense is winning games but Foles' throw to Montgomery in the TB game is an example of his value. That's value Trubinsky never brought.
Did you miss the Detroit game this year?

You are so negative about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky you are ignoring subpar performances by Foles. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is done in Chicago. Are you willing to go in with Foles as the starter next year and be happy? He better play a lot better for that to seem like a good idea.


You have a tendency to fall back in love with Trubinsky every time he recovers from shooting himself in the foot, as if the past two years of inconsistency don't matter. I don't want Foles around next year except as a backup. I've been very clear that Foles is markedly better than Trubinsky - there's no doubt - but he's not a long-term solution. That says a lot about Trubinsky than it does about Foles because the latter is only an average QB. The simple truth is Foles adds more value because he's better at professional football than Trubinsky is. Maybe Trubinsky has a future as an all-time QB in backyard Labor Day football games where he can live his dream of throwing on the fly and not thinking about coverages.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
You have a tendency to fall back in love with Trubinsky every time he recovers from shooting himself in the foot, as if the past two years of inconsistency don't matter.
I don't know what you are talking about. I was never "in love" with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He's just not being outplayed by Foles.

veganfan21 wrote:
I've been very clear that Foles is markedly better than Trubinsky - there's no doubt - but he's not a long-term solution.
Based on what? Is this just your gut feeling? Statistically, both this season and career wise they are pretty similar with Foles being propped up by the one good season he had in his career.


veganfan21 wrote:
That says a lot about Trubinsky than it does about Foles because the latter is only an average QB. The simple truth is Foles adds more value because he's better at professional football than Trubinsky is. Maybe Trubinsky has a future as an all-time QB in backyard Labor Day football games where he can live his dream of throwing on the fly and not thinking about coverages.
Provide some substance here because statistically, as a passer, they are pretty close to the same. Foles numbers in games he has started are pretty bad though obviously the results of that first game still count and he was good there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
You have a tendency to fall back in love with Trubinsky every time he recovers from shooting himself in the foot, as if the past two years of inconsistency don't matter.
I don't know what you are talking about. I was never "in love" with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. He's just not being outplayed by Foles.

veganfan21 wrote:
I've been very clear that Foles is markedly better than Trubinsky - there's no doubt - but he's not a long-term solution.
Based on what? Is this just your gut feeling? Statistically, both this season and career wise they are pretty similar with Foles being propped up by the one good season he had in his career.


veganfan21 wrote:
That says a lot about Trubinsky than it does about Foles because the latter is only an average QB. The simple truth is Foles adds more value because he's better at professional football than Trubinsky is. Maybe Trubinsky has a future as an all-time QB in backyard Labor Day football games where he can live his dream of throwing on the fly and not thinking about coverages.
Provide some substance here because statistically, as a passer, they are pretty close to the same. Foles numbers in games he has started are pretty bad though obviously the results of that first game still count and he was good there.


I already provided a detailed, factual, even-handed analysis that painstakingly went through all important metrics for a QB. It gave the edge to Trubinsky when warranted and gave the edge to Foles when warranted. In the end, after all that objective analysis, and despite Trubinsky having the edge in a few categories, it concluded that it would be tough to say that Trubinsky is better than Foles. You seem to have no difficulty doing that, however. That's because you're pre-commited to the idea that Trubinsky is better than Foles and no data will change your mind. You're incapable of looking at this objectively and have already made up your mind. Moreover, as my final point here, there is no outpouring of outrage around the league for Trubinsky being benched for Foles, no rapidly developing trade market for his services, and no media narratives about where Trubinsky is going next or if he'll reclaim his job from Foles. That's because the verdict is in on Trubinsky and it says he's no better than a league average QB likes Foles.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
I already provided a detailed, factual, even-handed analysis that painstakingly went through all important metrics for a QB. It gave the edge to Trubinsky when warranted and gave the edge to Foles when warranted. In the end, after all that objective analysis, and despite Trubinsky having the edge in a few categories, it concluded that it would be tough to say that Trubinsky is better than Foles. You seem to have no difficulty doing that, however. That's because you're pre-commited to the idea that Trubinsky is better than Foles and no data will change your mind.
You found one article that gave a slight edge to Foles that didn't include running/mobility. We've now seen Foles put up similar or worse numbers than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the last 3 games. You would be ripping (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to shreds if he had played the exact same game yesterday.



veganfan21 wrote:
You're incapable of looking at this objectively and have already made up your mind. Moreover, as my final point here, there is no outpouring of outrage around the league for Trubinsky being benched for Foles, no rapidly developing trade market for his services, and no media narratives about where Trubinsky is going next or if he'll reclaim his job from Foles. That's because the verdict is in on Trubinsky and it says he's no better than a league average QB likes Foles.
QB trades are rare in the NFL though the Patriots reportedly asked about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. That's still a strange argument to make. There are a lot of stories in the NFL that are far more interesting than the Bears qb competition and they certainly don't need to rely on "Where will (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky be in 2021" for content.

As for the "verdict" being in, when will Foles start outplaying (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I already provided a detailed, factual, even-handed analysis that painstakingly went through all important metrics for a QB. It gave the edge to Trubinsky when warranted and gave the edge to Foles when warranted. In the end, after all that objective analysis, and despite Trubinsky having the edge in a few categories, it concluded that it would be tough to say that Trubinsky is better than Foles. You seem to have no difficulty doing that, however. That's because you're pre-commited to the idea that Trubinsky is better than Foles and no data will change your mind.
You found one article that gave a slight edge to Foles that didn't include running/mobility. We've now seen Foles put up similar or worse numbers than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in the last 3 games. You would be ripping (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to shreds if he had played the exact same game yesterday.



veganfan21 wrote:
You're incapable of looking at this objectively and have already made up your mind. Moreover, as my final point here, there is no outpouring of outrage around the league for Trubinsky being benched for Foles, no rapidly developing trade market for his services, and no media narratives about where Trubinsky is going next or if he'll reclaim his job from Foles. That's because the verdict is in on Trubinsky and it says he's no better than a league average QB likes Foles.
QB trades are rare in the NFL though the Patriots reportedly asked about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. That's still a strange argument to make. There are a lot of stories in the NFL that are far more interesting than the Bears qb competition and they certainly don't need to rely on "Where will (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky be in 2021" for content.

As for the "verdict" being in, when will Foles start outplaying (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky?


Find an article that fits your pre-conceived notion, Rick. I'm not doing your work for you. The article did factor in mobility - Foles doesn't need it because, when a blitz comes, he knows where to go with the ball. Dumbasses tuck the ball and run. NFL professionals throw the ball to the open man. Are you Adam Shefter now? Where's the proof the Pats inquired about Trubinsky?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Find an article that fits your pre-conceived notion, Rick. I'm not doing your work for you. The article did factor in mobility - Foles doesn't need it because, when a blitz comes, he knows where to go with the ball. Dumbasses tuck the ball and run.
Yeah, running quarterbacks are bad. That's why I'm glad we don't have Lamar Jackson either.
veganfan21 wrote:
Where's the proof the Pats inquired about Trubinsky?
There was "buzz" about it. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Find an article that fits your pre-conceived notion, Rick. I'm not doing your work for you. The article did factor in mobility - Foles doesn't need it because, when a blitz comes, he knows where to go with the ball. Dumbasses tuck the ball and run.
Yeah, running quarterbacks are bad. That's why I'm glad we don't have Lamar Jackson either.
veganfan21 wrote:
Where's the proof the Pats inquired about Trubinsky?
There was "buzz" about it. :lol:


So that's a "no" on providing data supporting your Trubinsky - Foles assertion, right? Thought so.

Btw, Lamar Jackson also runs because he's not a good QB. It's not a best practice. Russell Wilson is an example of a good QB who can also run.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Foles is a leader of men.

Nagy and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky are not.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
So that's a "no" on providing data supporting your Trubinsky - Foles assertion, right? Thought so.
I have. Their career, and season numbers are virtually the same, and that doesn't include running ability where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is far superior.

In fact, I'll take it a step further. Do you believe that Foles this season will have numbers much better than this?
3,138 yards(209.2 per game), 17 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 63.2 completion percentage, 6.1 y/a.

He seems to be trending to be right around there or lower, and that was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky last year where you decided for certain he wasn't good.

veganfan21 wrote:
Btw, Lamar Jackson also runs because he's not a good QB. It's not a best practice. Russell Wilson is an example of a good QB who can also run.
:lol:

Would you rather have Nick Foles or Lamar Jackson right now?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Roquan Smith had a dominant day yesterday. There were a couple of plays that only a handful of LB in the entire league could make. The one in particular was a screen to the side on third and short where he flew from the middle of the field to stop the catcher before he could get a first down. Everyone, including myself, had chalked that up as a first down.

I also want to give some recognition to Buster Skreen. The guy is having a great season both in pass but especially in run support.

Mingo with another game where he makes an impact in very limited action.

Danny Travathan is cooked like a Thanksgiving turkey. I imagine Mc Vay will be smart enough to attack him on screens all day next week.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Quote:
I also want to give some recognition to Buster Skreen.

You can start by getting his name right.

Other than that, Good points about Smith and Skrine.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Travathan should never see the field again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Caller Bob wrote:
Travathan should never see the field again.


problem is, they have no depth at ILB because that Pace draftee from a couple of years ago has proven he sucks

They subbed S Deon Bush in on passing downs but he is hurt. Maybe they go to Mc Mannis since he is back from injury.

Pace absolutely made the wrong move signing Trevathan over Kwiatkowski for nearly equal money.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
So that's a "no" on providing data supporting your Trubinsky - Foles assertion, right? Thought so.
I have. Their career, and season numbers are virtually the same, and that doesn't include running ability where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is far superior.

In fact, I'll take it a step further. Do you believe that Foles this season will have numbers much better than this?
3,138 yards(209.2 per game), 17 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 63.2 completion percentage, 6.1 y/a.

He seems to be trending to be right around there or lower, and that was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky last year where you decided for certain he wasn't good.

veganfan21 wrote:
Btw, Lamar Jackson also runs because he's not a good QB. It's not a best practice. Russell Wilson is an example of a good QB who can also run.
:lol:

Would you rather have Nick Foles or Lamar Jackson right now?


I believe the Bears will average more PPG with Foles than Trubinsky. That's all that really matters. "running ability" doesn't mean anything. You know what does? "Thinking ability". Trubinsky doesn't have that.

I wouldn't want Jackson or Foles moving forward.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Travathan should never see the field again.


problem is, they have no depth at ILB because that Pace draftee from a couple of years ago has proven he sucks

They subbed S Deon Bush in on passing downs but he is hurt. Maybe they go to Mc Mannis since he is back from injury.

Pace absolutely made the wrong move signing Trevathan over Kwiatkowski for nearly equal money.


Was that the "special teams guru"? Southern Continent put it best, only Ryan Pace would draft a specialist in a phase that the NFL is looking to phase out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
So that's a "no" on providing data supporting your Trubinsky - Foles assertion, right? Thought so.
I have. Their career, and season numbers are virtually the same, and that doesn't include running ability where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is far superior.

In fact, I'll take it a step further. Do you believe that Foles this season will have numbers much better than this?
3,138 yards(209.2 per game), 17 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 63.2 completion percentage, 6.1 y/a.

He seems to be trending to be right around there or lower, and that was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky last year where you decided for certain he wasn't good.

veganfan21 wrote:
Btw, Lamar Jackson also runs because he's not a good QB. It's not a best practice. Russell Wilson is an example of a good QB who can also run.
:lol:

Would you rather have Nick Foles or Lamar Jackson right now?


I believe the Bears will average more PPG with Foles than Trubinsky. That's all that really matters. "running ability" doesn't mean anything. You know what does? "Thinking ability". Trubinsky doesn't have that.

I wouldn't want Jackson or Foles moving forward.
Do you believe Foles will have better numbers than I posted above by a significant margin?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
So that's a "no" on providing data supporting your Trubinsky - Foles assertion, right? Thought so.
I have. Their career, and season numbers are virtually the same, and that doesn't include running ability where (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is far superior.

In fact, I'll take it a step further. Do you believe that Foles this season will have numbers much better than this?
3,138 yards(209.2 per game), 17 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 63.2 completion percentage, 6.1 y/a.

He seems to be trending to be right around there or lower, and that was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky last year where you decided for certain he wasn't good.

veganfan21 wrote:
Btw, Lamar Jackson also runs because he's not a good QB. It's not a best practice. Russell Wilson is an example of a good QB who can also run.
:lol:

Would you rather have Nick Foles or Lamar Jackson right now?


I believe the Bears will average more PPG with Foles than Trubinsky. That's all that really matters. "running ability" doesn't mean anything. You know what does? "Thinking ability". Trubinsky doesn't have that.

I wouldn't want Jackson or Foles moving forward.
Do you believe Foles will have better numbers than I posted above by a significant margin?


I only look at PPG.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
I only look at PPG.
That's kind of dumb but I'll play along.

For his career with the Bears, they have scored 20.48 per game that he has started.
What do you expect Foles to end with in games he has started for them this year?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tell me Rick, is it really dumber than the following statement, which is essentially your argument:

"Trubinsky can't read defenses or put points on the board, but boy can he really run when his lack of intelligence leads him to think a play broke down! Sweet mercy look at those long legs"

Let's not pretend whose got the dumber take here.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
That's not my take at all.

The fact that you won't answer the question about production is all that matters. Ignore the fact that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can also make plays running and stick to passing. Plant your flag on Foles doing far better than 2019 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in passing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
That's not my take at all.

The fact that you won't answer the question about production is all that matters. Ignore the fact that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can also make plays running and stick to passing. Plant your flag on Foles doing far better than 2019 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in passing.


Production is points. I've already said the team will average more points with Foles. They'll average more PPG this year with Foles than they did last year with your preferred QB, adjusting for TOs, defensive TDs, etc.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
That's not my take at all.

The fact that you won't answer the question about production is all that matters. Ignore the fact that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can also make plays running and stick to passing. Plant your flag on Foles doing far better than 2019 (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in passing.


Production is points. I've already said the team will average more points with Foles. They'll average more PPG this year with Foles than they did last year with your preferred QB, adjusting for TOs, defensive TDs, etc.


Btw, your obsession with running is meaningless. What value did it add last year? The honest answer is not a thing.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
If Matt Nagy passes the ball again, with the lead with less than 2 minutes to play, he has to be fired on the spot. Two fucking weeks in a row!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Who's better Rick?

Foles or Bitch?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
312player wrote:
Who's better Rick?

Foles or patriot?


Foles is better than Cam Newton.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 288 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group