It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:45 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82234
Stop wasting your time

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
So the biggest bust is basically just the highest quarterback a team drafted that didn't turn into a great player?


We seemed to be doing well, and by that I mean having a decent exchange of viewpoints, until this one. I'll let you try again.

You said that the pick filled the most important position on the roster. Does that disqualify all non-quarterback picks from being the biggest bust?

Even if we say that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is a bigger bust than Cade McCown, you still can't say he was a bigger bust than Curtis Enis unless it has to be a quarterback. That's not even getting into the Cedric Benson discussion.



(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky vs Enis is a good one. I will say there are two things working in favor of the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as a bigger bust argument:

1) he was picked higher than Enis (I hope this is indisputable)

2) You're expecting an all-world RB at #5 just like you're expecting a franchise QB at #2. Both failed spectacularly. I think missing on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was more detrimental to the franchise than missing on Enis. If you hit on QB you're open up a window for contention for a long time. Not necessarily true for RB, even if you strike gold. When you add the additional draft capital expended to acquire (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, it amplifies the hit the franchise took that night. That's why he's the biggest draft bust in Chicago history.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.


The way Pace/Nagy is going they'll trade two picks to DC for Alex Smith because he's run Andy Reid's stuff before. It won't matter that Alex Smith was actually a free agent, they'll still trade two picks for him.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.


The way Pace/Nagy is going they'll trade two picks to DC for Alex Smith because he's run Andy Reid's stuff before. It won't matter that Alex Smith was actually a free agent, they'll still trade two picks for him.

:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.


The way Pace/Nagy is going they'll trade two picks to DC for Alex Smith because he's run Andy Reid's stuff before. It won't matter that Alex Smith was actually a free agent, they'll still trade two picks for him.

:lol:

+ :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Regular Reader wrote:
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.


The way Pace/Nagy is going they'll trade two picks to DC for Alex Smith because he's run Andy Reid's stuff before. It won't matter that Alex Smith was actually a free agent, they'll still trade two picks for him.

:lol:

+ :lol:

Thank you....this thread went to shit. I appreciate you bringing back some decent discussion points :lol:

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
But what about the Camry?

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23844
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
True, another page of Nick-Mitch debate would have been Think Tank worthy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
What I don't get about the criticism of the Nick Mitch thing is that topic is a classic sports debate taking place on a sports message board. If ya'll want to transform the site into some blog on JDC and the coronavirus then have at it, but so as long as the site is about Chicago sports then ya'll can take your thoughts on the Rick Mitch stuff and shove them up your asses.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
BigW72 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Brick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Brick wrote:
Luckily, this won't matter when the Bears give Dak $25 million a year next year.


The way Pace/Nagy is going they'll trade two picks to DC for Alex Smith because he's run Andy Reid's stuff before. It won't matter that Alex Smith was actually a free agent, they'll still trade two picks for him.

:lol:

+ :lol:

Thank you....this thread went to shit. I appreciate you bringing back some decent discussion points :lol:


When the bears trade two picks for a free agent they will go to the nflpa. They get to emancipate to rookies straight to free agency.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
veganfan21 wrote:
What I don't get about the criticism of the Nick Mitch thing is that topic is a classic sports debate taking place on a sports message board. If ya'll want to transform the site into some blog on JDC and the coronavirus then have at it, but so as long as the site is about Chicago sports then ya'll can take your thoughts on the Rick Mitch stuff and shove them up your asses.

It simply sounds like the Avellini vs. Phipps stuff I remember as a kid, or Harbaough vs. Tomczak crap. Mental masturbation/pointless debate at it's worst.

May as well argue email formats.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
I have mutt set up to auto convert incoming messages to plain text


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Regular Reader wrote:
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

:lol: :cry: :lol: :cry: :lol:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24072
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Regular Reader wrote:
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

In fairness that guy had an insane game.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

In fairness that guy had an insane game.

Agreed, he outplayed Foles by a mile.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

In fairness that guy had an insane game.

And this will kill half the board, but Laurence Holmes called it first.

First breaking story, check.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Hawg Ass wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
You all can fight over this all you want to, but the reality is that the Rams' most valuable player was their punter. :lol: :lol:

In fairness that guy had an insane game.

Agreed, he outplayed Foles by a mile.

You can even say that he helped gave Foles 60 minutes of hell. :D

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2020 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16488
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Seacrest wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Bears could go from the NFC #1 seed to out of the playoff picture as early as next week.


No


Out. :wink: :lol:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears at Rams
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Bears could go from the NFC #1 seed to out of the playoff picture as early as next week.


No


Out. :wink: :lol:

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nardi, The Doctor Of Style and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group