It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 1:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38739
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Crick Ramp wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
She wouldn't have made the Q trade.

That trade really did make sense at the time.

When he was acquired, the window appeared wide open, the friendliness of the financials, and having Hendricks, Lester and Jake on the staff made it seem like adding Q was ideal.

Chatwood completely shitting the bed as a starter, in hindsight, now makes Q’s mediocrity seem like a complete bust considering what was given up.

But at the time...it made sense

I mean if you want to say adding an innings eating .500 pitcher in exchange for what most people were saying was a cant miss prospect made sense thats on you.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23892
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Dorks


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 12:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
badrogue17 wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
She wouldn't have made the Q trade.

That trade really did make sense at the time.

When he was acquired, the window appeared wide open, the friendliness of the financials, and having Hendricks, Lester and Jake on the staff made it seem like adding Q was ideal.

Chatwood completely shitting the bed as a starter, in hindsight, now makes Q’s mediocrity seem like a complete bust considering what was given up.

But at the time...it made sense

I mean if you want to say adding an innings eating .500 pitcher in exchange for what most people were saying was a cant miss prospect made sense thats on you.

I’m not trying to split hairs here. But you’re evaluating the move based on the results. And hey, that is completely fair. The trade failed based on the results and it’s a results oriented business. So, your point of view is not wrong.

But, at the time, in 2017 Theo was adding a proven number 2-3 starter to a rotation that included the reigning ERA winner (Hendricks), Arietta, Lester and an offense that hadn’t yet revealed itself as being incompetent.

The move made sense at the time is all I’m saying. Shit, if the We knew the cubs offense was going to be DOA in the post season for years to come, adding Johnson and Schilling circa 2002 wouldn’t have made sense haha


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 12:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79637
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
KDdidit wrote:
Dorks


Image


That photo reminds me of a forced march I was taken on during a cold day at Spottswoode.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Crick Ramp wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
She wouldn't have made the Q trade.

That trade really did make sense at the time.

When he was acquired, the window appeared wide open, the friendliness of the financials, and having Hendricks, Lester and Jake on the staff made it seem like adding Q was ideal.

Chatwood completely shitting the bed as a starter, in hindsight, now makes Q’s mediocrity seem like a complete bust considering what was given up.

But at the time...it made sense

I mean if you want to say adding an innings eating .500 pitcher in exchange for what most people were saying was a cant miss prospect made sense thats on you.

I’m not trying to split hairs here. But you’re evaluating the move based on the results. And hey, that is completely fair. The trade failed based on the results and it’s a results oriented business. So, your point of view is not wrong.

But, at the time, in 2017 Theo was adding a proven number 2-3 starter to a rotation that included the reigning ERA winner (Hendricks), Arietta, Lester and an offense that hadn’t yet revealed itself as being incompetent.

The move made sense at the time is all I’m saying. Shit, if the We knew the cubs offense was going to be DOA in the post season for years to come, adding Johnson and Schilling circa 2002 wouldn’t have made sense haha


You don't trade your top pitching and offensive prospects for a 3rd starter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 2:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79637
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Peoria Matt wrote:
You don't trade your top pitching and offensive prospects for a 3rd starter.


You know just how bad a trade it was when mild-mannered Cub fan Matt is raging against it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6312
pizza_Place: Frozen
This is pretty much ridculous. But, Theo? What actually playing the game experience does he or Hahn have. Waterboys at Yale, and Harvard?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2018 8:58 am
Posts: 6312
pizza_Place: Frozen
Q isn't even a 3rd starter quality with the Cubs. 3.51 era with Sox, 4.24 with Cubs. His 33-23 record with the Cubs is highly deceiving.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27519
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I'm shocked that Jules has not outright taken credit for this hiring or at least likened herself to Ng yet. I also see that HawaiiKeepingScore approves of the hiring.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 4:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
vitoscotti wrote:
This is pretty much ridculous. But, Theo? What actually playing the game experience does he or Hahn have. Waterboys at Yale, and Harvard?

Are you the weatherman caller?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24595
pizza_Place: It's gone
Crick Ramp wrote:
vitoscotti wrote:
This is pretty much ridculous. But, Theo? What actually playing the game experience does he or Hahn have. Waterboys at Yale, and Harvard?

Are you the weatherman caller?


he worked for Les.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
HawaiiYou wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
vitoscotti wrote:
This is pretty much ridculous. But, Theo? What actually playing the game experience does he or Hahn have. Waterboys at Yale, and Harvard?

Are you the weatherman caller?


he worked for Les.

That explains a lot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Crick Ramp wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Crick Ramp wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
She wouldn't have made the Q trade.

That trade really did make sense at the time.

When he was acquired, the window appeared wide open, the friendliness of the financials, and having Hendricks, Lester and Jake on the staff made it seem like adding Q was ideal.

Chatwood completely shitting the bed as a starter, in hindsight, now makes Q’s mediocrity seem like a complete bust considering what was given up.

But at the time...it made sense

I mean if you want to say adding an innings eating .500 pitcher in exchange for what most people were saying was a cant miss prospect made sense thats on you.

I’m not trying to split hairs here. But you’re evaluating the move based on the results. And hey, that is completely fair. The trade failed based on the results and it’s a results oriented business. So, your point of view is not wrong.

But, at the time, in 2017 Theo was adding a proven number 2-3 starter to a rotation that included the reigning ERA winner (Hendricks), Arietta, Lester and an offense that hadn’t yet revealed itself as being incompetent.

The move made sense at the time is all I’m saying. Shit, if the We knew the cubs offense was going to be DOA in the post season for years to come, adding Johnson and Schilling circa 2002 wouldn’t have made sense haha



The move didn't make sense, we weren't a 4th starter away from a ring.. The only real debate was whether Q was a 3rd or 4th starter..he was never an ace or a #2.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
Agree to disagree ya’ll. Doesn’t matter now. CUbs are fucked til 2025 most likely


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
You don't trade your top pitching and offensive prospects for a 3rd starter.


You know just how bad a trade it was when mild-mannered Cub fan Matt is raging against it.


The Sox subdivision tried to warn me. But that 1st start against Baltimore had me starry eyed. What a fucking joke of a trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Kim Ng Un has serious mult potential, you dumbies.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31723
pizza_Place: What??
Even your mild mannered contributions suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43586
Nardi wrote:
Even your mild mannered contributions suck

:lol:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82292
I agree with Crick on this.

Also, the year of the trade he was starting to fade a little, but before that he was most definitely pitching at a #2 level. Four straight years of 200+ innings with an ERA around three and advanced stats that indicated he was pitching even better than that. On top of that, he was getting better each year.

He was also signed to an incredibly team favorable contract, which made him one of the most highly valued players in baseball. His contract allowed the Cubs to sign a host of other players. Unfortunately both Q and all those other players were bad once they got tot he Cubs.

Cease AND Jimenez seemed like an overpay. I'm not so sure it is any more. Jimenez will be a star. There is as good of a chance right now that Cease will be nothing as a pitcher as he will be a regular MLB starter

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 25, 2019 4:26 pm
Posts: 2211
pizza_Place: DATYYy
good dolphin wrote:
I agree with Crick on this.

Also, the year of the trade he was starting to fade a little, but before that he was most definitely pitching at a #2 level. Four straight years of 200+ innings with an ERA around three and advanced stats that indicated he was pitching even better than that. On top of that, he was getting better each year.

He was also signed to an incredibly team favorable contract, which made him one of the most highly valued players in baseball. His contract allowed the Cubs to sign a host of other players. Unfortunately both Q and all those other players were bad once they got tot he Cubs.

Cease AND Jimenez seemed like an overpay. I'm not so sure it is any more. Jimenez will be a star. There is as good of a chance right now that Cease will be nothing as a pitcher as he will be a regular MLB starter

Yep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31723
pizza_Place: What??
good dolphin wrote:
I agree with Crick on this.

Also, the year of the trade he was starting to fade a little, but before that he was most definitely pitching at a #2 level. Four straight years of 200+ innings with an ERA around three and advanced stats that indicated he was pitching even better than that. On top of that, he was getting better each year.

He was also signed to an incredibly team favorable contract, which made him one of the most highly valued players in baseball. His contract allowed the Cubs to sign a host of other players. Unfortunately both Q and all those other players were bad once they got tot he Cubs.

Cease AND Jimenez seemed like an overpay. I'm not so sure it is any more. Jimenez will be a star. There is as good of a chance right now that Cease will be nothing as a pitcher as he will be a regular MLB starter

Cease, as well as any other high skilled prospect pitcher, has to develop command. And that's hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Pronounced "ANG"

had to look that up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24595
pizza_Place: It's gone
geez what a terrible story. That douche who did this to her reminds me of ....... xxxxxx xxx.




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kim Ng
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43586
rogers park bryan wrote:
Pronounced "ANG"

had to look that up

Rogue pronounces it differently.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group