It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I agree. What this .500 team needs is a .500 coach.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Jeff Fisher's still available, if the goal is to go 8-9 every year.

Lombardi was correct in his initial assessment of Doug Pederson. 2017 was all Frank Reich's offense, Pederson along for the ride. Combination of Eagles playing a weak sister regular season schedule in 2017 and then the chips falling favorably to the Eagles in the playoffs---getting to play Atlanta in the divisional round with Atlanta playing their 4th road game in a row in 3 different time zones; the Keenum-Vikings horseshoeing their way to a win over the Saints and getting properly destroyed by the Eagles in Philly--before Belichick pulled the rug out from under his own defense in the super bowl.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
I agree. What this .500 team needs is a .500 coach.
It would be so Bears that in a 17 game season, the end the year 8-8-1

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
Since 1970, the Bears are 390-401-1. A .500 coach would be an upgrade. The Bears are the Tennessee Volunteers of the NFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Pretty darn close to .500 for a 50+year sample size. Wonder how the Bengals, another team that feels forever .500, turned out.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
Curious Hair wrote:
Pretty darn close to .500 for a 50+year sample size. Wonder how the Bengals, another team that feels forever .500, turned out.



A lot worse than the Bears at 356-432-4

https://champsorchumps.us/records/most- ... since-1970


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255
Matt Campbell from Iowa State

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:50 pm
Posts: 1544
pizza_Place: Beek's
I saw an article today that Russell Wilson might still want to be traded. If you're the next GM of the Bears, do you trade for Russell Wilson? I'm assuming you include Fields along with various draft picks.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... ng-traded/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Next GM/Coach tandem
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
of course you trade for Wilson (at least if it's this year or last). Don't see the Seahawks taking a QB prospect who is dead last in the league in every statistical category in exchange for a bag of balls, let alone a HoF QB. Plus if you're the Seahawks or GB you kick your disgruntled franchise QB to the other side of the bracket for the playoffs.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group