It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57228
:lol: :lol: anything for Larry to remind you he played ball and was THIS close to getting to the league

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
RFDC wrote:
:lol: :lol: anything for Larry to remind you he played ball and was THIS close to getting to the league

about as close as I've ever been to being signed to Elektra records :lol:

Nas...I agree. I know they all fuck the younger players. They have a legitimate stand on the revenue sharing split, but they're gonna botch this and look like fools.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:58 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
In my car time yesterday I heard some LoHo discussing this. His take was that he’s reflexively on the side of the players because he can envision himself as one of them but can’t do the same for ownership.

Immediately siding with one of these groups seems stupid. Thinking you can in any way relate to a professional baseball player during a labor dispute seems stupider.


I think it was more about being able to relate to a worker.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10103
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24034
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38687
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

Again its hard to play violins for players making a minimum of 550k a year. This isnt local 701 trying to get an apprentice wage to $22 an hour.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Last edited by badrogue17 on Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
Rooting hard for the owners who actually wanted to have a COVID season and the players were like "Nope. We won't negotiate but you can force us to work so just force us".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24034
pizza_Place: Pizanos
badrogue17 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

Again its hard to play violins for players making a minimum of 550k a year.

I don’t really care how it shakes out, I just don’t want this fucking with a budding White Sox dynasty.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24034
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
Rooting hard for the owners who actually wanted to have a COVID season and the players were like "Nope. We won't negotiate but you can force us to work so just force us".

Don’t kink shame.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57228
DOn't worry it will be the 2nd mythical Sox Championship! 1994 and 2022!

Damn man holding down the Sox

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57228
Brick wrote:
Rooting hard for the owners who actually wanted to have a COVID season and the players were like "Nope. We won't negotiate but you can force us to work so just force us".

That is an intriguing part of this story.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38687
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
DOn't worry it will be the 2nd mythical Sox Championship! 1994 and 2022!

Damn man holding down the Sox

Yep. Its the man holding them down.



_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I may hate them, but it sure ain’t the “dman” holding them down.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24034
pizza_Place: Pizanos
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
DOn't worry it will be the 2nd mythical Sox Championship! 1994 and 2022!

Damn man holding down the Sox

Yep. Its the man holding them down.



Doesn’t count. Nobody reported on it with first hand experience, so unclear if it happened. Astros probably cheated. Hendriks was just working on his stuff in a blowout game. Wind was blowing out. Altuve cheated.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10103
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

But they might not spend the $165M guaranteed on Javy Baez.

Most players never get to third year arbitration. They simply aren't good enough compared to a AAAA type to command a raise and guaranteed money even for that year. Brian Goodwin is an example of that type of guy, better than a AAAA guy like Rafael Ortega with the eye test when they were both in the Angels organization but not so much better that a team would invest $4M in him to go through the arb process instead of putting $550k on either a fungible AAAA type or starting the clock on a prospect like Gavin Sheets. A team can then invest the remaining $3.5M on someone else, using to pay down a bad contract, or in the case of uncle Jerry just pocketing it.

Other leagues get around this problem by not guaranteeing contracts. MLB just non-tenders guys. Some sort of NHL-ish RFA should be in place in lieu of 3rd year arbitration, but neither side will accept it.

MLB should make concessions which help grow the size of the union: 32 teams by 2028, 28-man rosters and increasing the 40-man to 45. MLBPA should make concessions around horrible long term guaranteed contracts but agents will throw a fit. Meanwhile expand the playoffs to 16 teams but give teams with a 10+ game difference in the first round an automatic win in lieu of Game 1, and those with a 20+ game difference two automatic wins. Give the current players a split of expansion fees to be retroactively paid out to players between 2022-2027 as a bonus based on playing time.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

But they might not spend the $165M guaranteed on Javy Baez.

Most players never get to third year arbitration. They simply aren't good enough compared to a AAAA type to command a raise and guaranteed money even for that year. Brian Goodwin is an example of that type of guy, better than a AAAA guy like Rafael Ortega with the eye test when they were both in the Angels organization but not so much better that a team would invest $4M in him to go through the arb process instead of putting $550k on either a fungible AAAA type or starting the clock on a prospect like Gavin Sheets. A team can then invest the remaining $3.5M on someone else, using to pay down a bad contract, or in the case of uncle Jerry just pocketing it.

Other leagues get around this problem by not guaranteeing contracts. MLB just non-tenders guys. Some sort of NHL-ish RFA should be in place in lieu of 3rd year arbitration, but neither side will accept it.

MLB should make concessions which help grow the size of the union: 32 teams by 2028, 28-man rosters and increasing the 40-man to 45. MLBPA should make concessions around horrible long term guaranteed contracts but agents will throw a fit. Meanwhile expand the playoffs to 16 teams but give teams with a 10+ game difference in the first round an automatic win in lieu of Game 1, and those with a 20+ game difference two automatic wins. Give the current players a split of expansion fees to be retroactively paid out to players between 2022-2027 as a bonus based on playing time.

This goes back to what I said earlier. The union wants a bigger share of the pie which is understandable, but they really don't give a shit about the younger players. All of the options you mention water down the league (expansion teams, increased playoff teams).
I don't have the answer here and I don't think the union does, either. The best things the MLBPA can do is fight for salary floor, raise league minimum, and change service time. Adding playoff teams and league expansion do not equate to the players getting a more equitable piece of the revenue pie....they just increase revenue for the owners.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
MLB Network is playing random games of the past.

Right now they have Angels at White Sox 2007 - Thome's 500th hr.

The best part is hearing Hawk do the broadcast. Reminds me how pleasing it was to listen to Hawk. His baseball stories really make the game secondary at times.

update - Vlad Sr. breaks his bat and Hawk says' Matt Abattacola right there'. LOL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
BigW72 wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The union has a disconnect in their arguments:

1. Expanded playoffs mean that teams won't spend money on premium players and instead try to sneak in with 84 wins.
2. Not expanding playoffs means that teams won't spend the incremental money on the bottom half of their lineups and rotations to go from a 68-70 win team to a 77-80 win team, but they think owners should be obligated to spend the guaranteed money anyway.

Can't have it both ways.

I think it goes back to the middle class v. superstar dynamic. The union seems more interested in the high profile contracts than the whole membership.

I’d think the expanded playoff would lead teams to spend more on marginally better/proven talent if they’re close to playoff caliber.

But they might not spend the $165M guaranteed on Javy Baez.

Most players never get to third year arbitration. They simply aren't good enough compared to a AAAA type to command a raise and guaranteed money even for that year. Brian Goodwin is an example of that type of guy, better than a AAAA guy like Rafael Ortega with the eye test when they were both in the Angels organization but not so much better that a team would invest $4M in him to go through the arb process instead of putting $550k on either a fungible AAAA type or starting the clock on a prospect like Gavin Sheets. A team can then invest the remaining $3.5M on someone else, using to pay down a bad contract, or in the case of uncle Jerry just pocketing it.

Other leagues get around this problem by not guaranteeing contracts. MLB just non-tenders guys. Some sort of NHL-ish RFA should be in place in lieu of 3rd year arbitration, but neither side will accept it.

MLB should make concessions which help grow the size of the union: 32 teams by 2028, 28-man rosters and increasing the 40-man to 45. MLBPA should make concessions around horrible long term guaranteed contracts but agents will throw a fit. Meanwhile expand the playoffs to 16 teams but give teams with a 10+ game difference in the first round an automatic win in lieu of Game 1, and those with a 20+ game difference two automatic wins. Give the current players a split of expansion fees to be retroactively paid out to players between 2022-2027 as a bonus based on playing time.

This goes back to what I said earlier. The union wants a bigger share of the pie which is understandable, but they really don't give a shit about the younger players. All of the options you mention water down the league (expansion teams, increased playoff teams).
I don't have the answer here and I don't think the union does, either. The best things the MLBPA can do is fight for salary floor, raise league minimum, and change service time. Adding playoff teams and league expansion do not equate to the players getting a more equitable piece of the revenue pie....they just increase revenue for the owners.


I think you are going to see a change in service time when everything is said and done and I think it's going to hurt every team that's not the Red Sox, Yankees, Mets, or Dodgers.That being said, the current service time rules are one of the big reasons why teams are tanking. I don't know how you square that circle, but I would hate to see them change the service time rules and leave everything else more or less in place. It's just going to result in good players getting plucked from smaller teams quicker.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2507
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
312player wrote:
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.


I think there's probably a better system out there somewhere, but what would you propose in its place that's feasible? If you're going to do rookie contracts like the NBA or NFL, you're going to have to also impose a salary cap. If you don't, small market teams will truly become 4A teams. I don't think the players are going to agree to a salary cap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Warren Newson wrote:
312player wrote:
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.


I think there's probably a better system out there somewhere, but what would you propose in its place that's feasible? If you're going to do rookie contracts like the NBA or NFL, you're going to have to also impose a salary cap. If you don't, small market teams will truly become 4A teams. I don't think the players are going to agree to a salary cap.


We already have a salary cap, it is just a soft one though. Id like to see an equal split of revenue like nfl..it would get us more parity imo. The Mets and Dodgers had a 235 million payroll and Baltimore and Pittsburgh had 23 million. That is absurd.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24034
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Warren Newson wrote:
312player wrote:
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.


I think there's probably a better system out there somewhere, but what would you propose in its place that's feasible? If you're going to do rookie contracts like the NBA or NFL, you're going to have to also impose a salary cap. If you don't, small market teams will truly become 4A teams. I don't think the players are going to agree to a salary cap.

They should make it more difficult for a team to game the service time thing. The Kris Bryant scenario obviously comes to mind. Change the definition of a ‘full year’ of service time to actually punish a team if they’re going to choose player control over fielding a competitive roster.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
312player wrote:
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.


I think there's probably a better system out there somewhere, but what would you propose in its place that's feasible? If you're going to do rookie contracts like the NBA or NFL, you're going to have to also impose a salary cap. If you don't, small market teams will truly become 4A teams. I don't think the players are going to agree to a salary cap.

They should make it more difficult for a team to game the service time thing. The Kris Bryant scenario obviously comes to mind. Change the definition of a ‘full year’ of service time to actually punish a team if they’re going to choose player control over fielding a competitive roster.

The simple solution is that you only "control" a player until they are 24 years old or for four years after you draft them. You want them longer than that then sign them to an extension.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
312player wrote:
The service time was always garbage, never should have been allowed. Id like to see fewer games. 140 reg season and start season on may 1st.


I think there's probably a better system out there somewhere, but what would you propose in its place that's feasible? If you're going to do rookie contracts like the NBA or NFL, you're going to have to also impose a salary cap. If you don't, small market teams will truly become 4A teams. I don't think the players are going to agree to a salary cap.

They should make it more difficult for a team to game the service time thing. The Kris Bryant scenario obviously comes to mind. Change the definition of a ‘full year’ of service time to actually punish a team if they’re going to choose player control over fielding a competitive roster.

The simple solution is that you only "control" a player until they are 24 years old or for four years after you draft them. You want them longer than that then sign them to an extension.


Absolutly.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 1:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
In Dusty We Trusty!

Dusty Baker wins Manager o' the Year award:

https://www.khou.com/article/sports/mlb ... Eq039-Duis

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 2:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2021 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
Buck Showalter Manager of the Mets.

Good move.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24550
pizza_Place: It's gone
Ken Rosenthal out at MLB Network due to previous criticism of Rob Manfred

https://nypost.com/2022/01/03/ken-rosen ... criticism/


added -



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This seems.....not good.


_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2021 Offseason
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I was just thinking about this in the morning....it's been DEAD quiet. There is zero chance the season starts on time. We don't even have a clear idea where they're in disagreement.

Not. Good.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group