Even Jesus was baptized.

_________________

Imagine thinking sharing a widely disseminated video from an HBO show is "edgy"

Good lord, you shared a literal snuff film on here and created a thread just to share shit that you get off to.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson

This was 2006. I suspect he shares most of Biden's politics.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

NEW RULE: if you're going to plagiarize a politician, plagiarize one who didn't lose. Joe Biden says he's exploring a presidential run in 2008. Yeah, I bet. Joe Biden "exploring a run for the presidency" is like me "exploring the possibility of getting high after the show." Yes, yes, thank you. The only difference--- . . . the only difference is that when I get high, I have a pretty good idea of what I'm doing. Joe Biden is a nice guy. But the last time he tried this, he got caught stealing a speech from Neil Kinnock, who lost in a landslide to Margaret Thatcher. Here's some advice for Copy-and-Paste Joe: steal the words of someone who won a presidential election. So announce your -- haha -- announce your intention to run by first thanking your lovely wife, Tipper Gore.

_________________

Not sure if that's real or some of your better work, but he "endorsed" Biden before Iowa.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

Yeah, but He was the producer of that show.

He needed the backstory.

_________________
My Maserati does 186.

I think he is the Creator of that show as well.

_________________

Nicholas Cage and Joaquin Phoenix taught me that snuff films aren't real

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Thoughts on the Trans explosion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMBzfUj5zsg

_________________

We’re a Jon Stewart clip away from libs acknowledging an issue they’ve created.

_________________

That was a great monologue.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal

Maher is a centrist at this point.

_________________

He's missing the point that it cannot be biologically possible for 20% of a population to be devoted non breeders unless they are organisms that asexually reproduce. Humans wouldn't exist if this was in any way reflective of reality. 17% of that 20% is lying or deluded themselves.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Science itself is transphobic and homophobic!

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Through most of human history, unless you died having kids early on, you ended up having a lot of them. The one or two kid households have become common only recently though kids used to die a lot more than they do now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I'd love to see if anything other than anecdotal evidence supports this. It seems like conventional wisdom only supported by 20th century photos of irish families.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Breeders are mediocre. The world would be better if they were in the minority.

and I am really beginning to dislike Donna Brazille. She's a (publicly) closeted lesbian and she gives no pushback on that, despite starting the show full of bravado saying she was there to combat his bullshit

she also seemed to have no clue who Adam Carolla was despite her "week of preparation" for the show

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Humanity won't end because some people are gay, lesbian, transsexual, or simply choose not to have kids. Besides, the world is overpopulated anyway.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!

I would say that massive increase in world population from the time men invented the wheel until the time men invented electricity would indicate that many families were having more kids than the one to replace them upon their death.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

20% is not some and yes, it will if 20% is not breeding. You need 2.1 fertility rate to sustain a population. Most of the western world is having a difficult time keeping up right now.

and no, the world is not overpopulated

demographers already expect that humans will hit a peak population this century and a slide down will begin

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

White people are at the forefront of all these. Applaud us. We also hate religion more than brown people.

Is it? I'm no statistician but I don't think it does. I think its more similar to compounded interest over time

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

I don't understand what you are saying. If in the Jesus years, and all the years after the Jesus years, if people had roughly one kid per parent, then the population would stay roughly the same. Instead, it's gone from 100-400 million to 8 billion people over roughly 80 generations.

This is the best chart I can find but it also just makes sense when you think about how population expanded that you'd have to have people have far more kids than one per parent.
https://www.prb.org/articles/how-many-people-have-ever-lived-on-earth/

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

I don't understand what you are saying. If in the Jesus years, and all the years after the Jesus years, if people had roughly one kid per parent, then the population would stay roughly the same. Instead, it's gone from 100-400 million to 8 billion people over roughly 80 generations.

This is the best chart I can find but it also just makes sense when you think about how population expanded that you'd have to have people have far more kids than one per parent.
https://www.prb.org/articles/how-many-people-have-ever-lived-on-earth/[/quote]

people were never having one kid per parent, but I think your point was that they were having a lot and I don't know if this is true.

Everything above 2.1 fertility rate from the time Lucy first mated resulted in an increase in population. Compound that over 70K years. So I don't think increased population is evidence that humans were having a lot more children per woman on average in 0 AD than 1950

a simplistic example would be Lucy is the first human. She has three children. Each of them has three children. That is an explosion in two generations but nobody is having a lot of children

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

It's somewhat variable but most things I found seem to indicate that the average family has been between 3-5 kids for most of human history.

We know a lot more about family size in the last 500 years for obvious reasons as record keeping was far better and more available and it is clear that family size has decreased significantly as countries have modernized.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Glad the White Sox weren't around then.

There's no question women produced far more children in the pre-modern era than they are now. It's how micro-economies sustained themselves - by breeding new workers and soldiers.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY

We're an industrialized country. We live significantly longer. Our offspring will push the maximum expectancy of human life. The birth rate also generally declines in industrialized countries. That's why they have generally leaned on immigration to sustain or increase their population. Over the past 40 years our immigration policy shifted toward the best and the brightest instead of manual laborers. The best and brightest didn't have many kids or they went back home after college.

We are running out of resources to feed the industrialized world. Things like impossible meat or lab grown meat aren't being introduced because big business cares about our health. We've just about run out of ways to harvest enough meat to feed people and we have just about run out of fresh water in most of the world. Including industrialized nations. Our population has to decline in order to sustain our natural resources.

You're going to have to get used to 1 or 2% growth annually.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!