It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Nas wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
I'm going to ask a question here. Not sure if it was addressed or not.

You guys do understand that in a case of miscarriage, if the fetus can't be passed naturally, an abortion is required, right?

In the case of an ectopic pregnancy, an inability to abort the fetus from the tubes would probably kill the mother too, right?

In the case of a fetus dying in utero, an abortion would be needed to get rid of it, right?

I've heard of situations where the fetus doesn't develop lungs, or a brain, and wouldn't live long enough to take a breath...or have the ability to, where an abortion is necessary...those are things that aren't found out until later in the pregnancy.

I'm not saying that killing a viable child is right. I'm asking questions about when it's not viable. Is it okay to require the mother to carry a corpse? Or possibly something that could kill her?


None of those examples are abortions. They are just distractions.


In medical terms, they are, doctor.


Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


As long as that remains the case, cool. I honestly don't care what people do as a whole. Necessary procedures should be protected, though.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24222
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I generally believe anything I read on the internet, but I always thought abortion required ending the pregnancy.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10796
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
I'm going to ask a question here. Not sure if it was addressed or not.

You guys do understand that in a case of miscarriage, if the fetus can't be passed naturally, an abortion is required, right?

In the case of an ectopic pregnancy, an inability to abort the fetus from the tubes would probably kill the mother too, right?

In the case of a fetus dying in utero, an abortion would be needed to get rid of it, right?

I've heard of situations where the fetus doesn't develop lungs, or a brain, and wouldn't live long enough to take a breath...or have the ability to, where an abortion is necessary...those are things that aren't found out until later in the pregnancy.

I'm not saying that killing a viable child is right. I'm asking questions about when it's not viable. Is it okay to require the mother to carry a corpse? Or possibly something that could kill her?


None of those examples are abortions. They are just distractions.


In medical terms, they are, doctor.


Ectopic pregnancy is a different treatment than an abortion. A dead fetus is called stillborn or a miscarriage. It's not an abortion. So in medical terms you are full of it.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Likely true. But in the event that somehow abortion was made illegal across the nation, it would go as I described.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10796
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Likely true. But in the event that somehow abortion was made illegal across the nation, it would go as I described.

We will have term limits and money out of Federal politics before we see abortion made illegal at the Federal level.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Why do you think it's unlikely that a Republican Congress and president would be unlikely to pass a federal law prohibiting abortion?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10796
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Tall Midget wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Why do you think it's unlikely that a Republican Congress and president would be unlikely to pass a federal law prohibiting abortion?

1) We've had Republican Congress and Republican President and it's never happened. They don't want that vote tied to their re-election campaigns.
2) We've had Democratic Congress and Democratic President and it's never happened (LEGALIZED at Federal level). They don't want that vote tied to their re-election campaigns.
3) This is and should have always been a STATE issue.
4) This is a legislative issue, not a Judicial issue.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:49 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Why do you think it's unlikely that a Republican Congress and president would be unlikely to pass a federal law prohibiting abortion?

1) We've had Republican Congress and Republican President and it's never happened. They don't want that vote tied to their re-election campaigns.
2) We've had Democratic Congress and Democratic President and it's never happened (LEGALIZED at Federal level). They don't want that vote tied to their re-election campaigns.
3) This is and should have always been a STATE issue.
4) This is a legislative issue, not a Judicial issue.


Points 2-4 are irrelevant. If Trump is elected in 2024 and the Republicans control both houses as expected, there's a decent chance such a law will be passed.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41382
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Not gonna happen, it's DeathSantis in 2024!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
R's controlled Congress during Trump's first two years in office.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24222
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Tall Midget wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Truthfully, most people can't afford to pay the cost for some of these abortions. These are wealthy people problems. They'll never have an issue aborting a child. Most of the things that you mentioned are services that all girls/women will be able to receive in America.


No doubt about it. When a sixteen year old in Winnetka gets knocked up she'll go to her gynecologist and he'll perform a procedure to end the pregnancy that won't be coded as an abortion on the billing.

It's Winnetka, so actually the 16 year-old girl will just go get an abortion...it's not like it's ever going to be illegal in Illinois.


Why do you think it's unlikely that a Republican Congress and president would be unlikely to pass a federal law prohibiting abortion?

Because Republicans can’t pass anything aside from the occasional tax cut.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The only way this happens is if the Dems eliminate the filibuster before then.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
R's controlled Congress during Trump's first two years in office.


So what?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Tall Midget wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
R's controlled Congress during Trump's first two years in office.


So what?
Image




If such a law wasn't passed when Trump was President with R's controlling both houses of Congress, why would it pass under the same circumstances two-three years from now?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
R's controlled Congress during Trump's first two years in office.


So what?
Image




If such a law wasn't passed when Trump was President with R's controlling both houses of Congress, why would it pass under the same circumstances two-three years from now?


Because our politics are becoming increasingly vindictive and petty.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
R's controlled Congress during Trump's first two years in office.


So what?
Image




If such a law wasn't passed when Trump was President with R's controlling both houses of Congress, why would it pass under the same circumstances two-three years from now?


Republican majorities are potentially larger, the president will not be pursuing reelection, and national polarization is intensifying.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Tall Midget wrote:
If Trump is elected in 2024 and the Republicans control both houses as expected, there's a decent chance such a law will be passed.


If the non-Trump portion of the Republican party back Liz Cheney as their standard-bearer in the 2024 Repub primaries, it will be when not if. Other than Hillary running again, can't think of any candidate more likely to remind folks why it might not have been or be crazy-adjacent to vote Trump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19066
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
I'm going to ask a question here. Not sure if it was addressed or not.

You guys do understand that in a case of miscarriage, if the fetus can't be passed naturally, an abortion is required, right?

In the case of an ectopic pregnancy, an inability to abort the fetus from the tubes would probably kill the mother too, right?

In the case of a fetus dying in utero, an abortion would be needed to get rid of it, right?

I've heard of situations where the fetus doesn't develop lungs, or a brain, and wouldn't live long enough to take a breath...or have the ability to, where an abortion is necessary...those are things that aren't found out until later in the pregnancy.

I'm not saying that killing a viable child is right. I'm asking questions about when it's not viable. Is it okay to require the mother to carry a corpse? Or possibly something that could kill her?


None of those examples are abortions. They are just distractions.


In medical terms, they are, doctor.


Ectopic pregnancy is a different treatment than an abortion. A dead fetus is called stillborn or a miscarriage. It's not an abortion. So in medical terms you are full of it.


Killing a baby in a fallopian tube = medical treatment, perfectly acceptable
Killing a baby in a uterus = murder, unacceptable

Man what a difference a few inches makes!

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10796
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Despite all the crying and grandstanding, US Congress will not touch this....THEY DON'T HAVE TO. It's with the states.
Take away Democrat and Republican titles....these people have one thing in common...don't do anything that prevents you from getting re-elected. There will never be Federal legislation on abortion....they had years to do it and always managed to find other "priorities". That's not changing....just as there will be no shortage of states all can visit to get their abortions.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 4:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
Despite all the crying and grandstanding, US Congress will not touch this....THEY DON'T HAVE TO. It's with the states.
Take away Democrat and Republican titles....these people have one thing in common...don't do anything that prevents you from getting re-elected. There will never be Federal legislation on abortion....they had years to do it and always managed to find other "priorities". That's not changing....just as there will be no shortage of states all can visit to get their abortions.


I can see why you wistfully long for Favre Fan's presence on the board since your absolutist view on the politics of abortion resembles his absolutism on Matthew Stafford's chances of winning a Super Bowl. You two appear to be kindred spirits.

Your position ignores the fact that the composition of Congress is changing along with the contours of our national politics and the character of our major parties. It wasn't too long ago that liberals were arguing that Trump would never be elected president or that the Supreme Court would never take down Roe vs. Wade. The definition of what is "possible" in American politics has changed significantly over the past decade. I personally wouldn't bet on a federal prohibition being enacted, but the (over)confidence with which you assert such legislation could never be passed strikes me as being woefully out of step with the times.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16499
pizza_Place: Boni Vino


Do people like her (and Julie, who re-tweeted this) actually believe the government is going to be coming into their homes and reading their coded diaries?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56045
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Your phone spies on everything you do, and these psychopaths are on a mission. One can't be too safe with this, I guess.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:05 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23908
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Curious Hair wrote:
Your phone spies on everything you do, and these psychopaths are on a mission. One can't be too safe with this, I guess.


Nope, nothing to worry about from the people that brought you the Texas Abortion Bounty Hunters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24222
pizza_Place: Pizanos
KDdidit wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Your phone spies on everything you do, and these psychopaths are on a mission. One can't be too safe with this, I guess.


Nope, nothing to worry about from the people that brought you the Texas Abortion Bounty Hunters

Image

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10796
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Tall Midget wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Despite all the crying and grandstanding, US Congress will not touch this....THEY DON'T HAVE TO. It's with the states.
Take away Democrat and Republican titles....these people have one thing in common...don't do anything that prevents you from getting re-elected. There will never be Federal legislation on abortion....they had years to do it and always managed to find other "priorities". That's not changing....just as there will be no shortage of states all can visit to get their abortions.


I can see why you wistfully long for Favre Fan's presence on the board since your absolutist view on the politics of abortion resembles his absolutism on Matthew Stafford's chances of winning a Super Bowl. You two appear to be kindred spirits.

Your position ignores the fact that the composition of Congress is changing along with the contours of our national politics and the character of our major parties. It wasn't too long ago that liberals were arguing that Trump would never be elected president or that the Supreme Court would never take down Roe vs. Wade. The definition of what is "possible" in American politics has changed significantly over the past decade. I personally wouldn't bet on a federal prohibition being enacted, but the (over)confidence with which you assert such legislation could never be passed strikes me as being woefully out of step with the times.

:lol: :lol: When you're right....you're right. Guilty as charged.
I will rephrase....I'd bet it does not happen, but acknowledge it's possible.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82299
national legislation has to have a constitutional hook to be enabled. The SC already eliminated one avenue.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Interstate Commerce? "No abortion can be performed within the United States if it uses any device or medication with a nexus to interstate commerce."

or how about

"Fetuses, like corporations and some family pets, are people too. Therefore...under the 14th Amendment:

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roe v Wade
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82299
Hussra wrote:
Interstate Commerce? "No abortion can be performed within the United States if it uses any device or medication with a nexus to interstate commerce."

or how about

"Fetuses, like corporations and some family pets, are people too. Therefore...under the 14th Amendment:

Image

Image


but this court is also against expansive readings of that

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group