It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:12 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I recognize the only way it would make sense is to take one of the lowest revenue teams in the league such as the Jaguars. Even if they drew 60k in existing soldier field, the added media exposure they would receive and potential for growth in fan base and merchandise sales in a much larger market is a win for the Jags and the city of Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31668
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
Your question was flawed. The Chicago Jaguars could draw 60k. The Salt Lake City Jaguars could draw 60k. The Jacksonville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Louisville Jaguars could draw 60k. The Boston Jaguars could draw 60k.

If this argument is if the Chicago Jaguars could physically exist in Chicago then of course they could. To me, the argument is about if they could exist in any way that makes sense for the league or the area.

I never mentioned the Jaguars. Is that why it's flawed?

I was being kind and using the Jaguars as an example.

Using a team like the Chargers that are outdrawing the Bears by 8k a game is only going to make your question worse.

Seems like an accounting tactic due to the stadium being half empty and every section has tix for sale throughout the year. But let's say you're right. They are still more lame in Lame LA then they are lame in Chicago. Because aren't we talking degrees of lameness?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
man of few opinions wrote:
Or did you think people in Boston and New England just didn't have a rooting interest in football until the Patriots were founded?


I mean, New England was never fertile football ground the way the Great Lakes/Western PA and the South were. It's not as if the Patriots satisfied this burning desire to have professional football -- they were an afterthought for years to a region that cared way more about the Red Sox and Bruins. Being a constant shitshow in a slapped-up stadium halfway to Providence had a lot to do with that, too, in fairness, but Boston was the only place you could argue that the NFL was #4. (Detroit in the mid-2000s, maybe?)

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
man of few opinions wrote:
I recognize the only way it would make sense is to take one of the lowest revenue teams in the league such as the Jaguars. Even if they drew 60k in existing soldier field, the added media exposure they would receive and potential for growth in fan base and merchandise sales in a much larger market is a win for the Jags and the city of Chicago.

It's really amazing that the NFL never gave up on Jacksonville. They thought they were getting in on the next Charlotte/Raleigh/Nashville boomtown, but it ended being more like the next, I dunno, Greenville, South Carolina. It just never quite happened there.

There was a year there, 2009 or 2010, where the team got blacked out the entire year and no one was going to games, where I thought that was it for them and they were bound for Los Angeles. If I have the timeline right, I think they were circling the drain in Jacksonville right when Georgia Frontiere died. That must have given the league the idea that they could make the L.A. Rams happen instead if they were patient.

I would have preferred the Las Vegas Jaguars with the Raiders staying put, for whatever that's worth.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Once the shine of those recent Super Bowls starts to dim, the patriots arent far from being #4 in Boston again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 9:23 pm
Posts: 870
pizza_Place: Baraccos
man of few opinions wrote:
Once the shine of those recent Super Bowls starts to dim, the patriots arent far from being #4 in Boston again.


Can't find the link I saw earlier but their ratings last Sunday were big. It might be Zappe fever.


Last edited by whitesoxfanfrank on Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
man of few opinions wrote:
Once the shine of those recent Super Bowls starts to dim, the patriots arent far from being #4 in Boston again.

I don't think so. If anything, it seems like Red Sox Nation is dying out very fast. The team is bad, except when they're not and they win the World Series, and then when they do it's kind of boring because no one knows who anyone is. Feels like the Celtics are the biggest team there now.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Which is why I said when the recent super bowl shine dims, a few losing seasons, things will shift dramatically for that franchise. They still have Belichick and ties to the super bowl teams. That’s a TOUGH market - Sox, Celtics and Bruins all have devoted fan bases.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 9:23 pm
Posts: 870
pizza_Place: Baraccos
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Curious Hair wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
I recognize the only way it would make sense is to take one of the lowest revenue teams in the league such as the Jaguars. Even if they drew 60k in existing soldier field, the added media exposure they would receive and potential for growth in fan base and merchandise sales in a much larger market is a win for the Jags and the city of Chicago.

It's really amazing that the NFL never gave up on Jacksonville. They thought they were getting in on the next Charlotte/Raleigh/Nashville boomtown, but it ended being more like the next, I dunno, Greenville, South Carolina. It just never quite happened there.

There was a year there, 2009 or 2010, where the team got blacked out the entire year and no one was going to games, where I thought that was it for them and they were bound for Los Angeles. If I have the timeline right, I think they were circling the drain in Jacksonville right when Georgia Frontiere died. That must have given the league the idea that they could make the L.A. Rams happen instead if they were patient.

I would have preferred the Las Vegas Jaguars with the Raiders staying put, for whatever that's worth.

Florida teams in all sports have been through this....Rays, Marlins, and Jaguars. I could be wrong, but I recall each of these "expansion" teams had solid leases in place that made it financially impossible fr these teams to pull out. I seem to recall that being the case when Bud Selig was talking about contracting and he named Minnesota and Montreal but left out Tampa, which was just as bad.

Gerogia's death and all that timed up really nice with the Rams lease in St. Louis ending and the fact there was really no penalty for the Rams to pack up and leave.

I agree....the Jaguars were a better candidate for Vegas. I find the Chargers situation much more aggravating. The league should have forced the hands of the Spanos family to figuring something out other than the ugly step-child of LA. Ridiculous. Still....I think the league has real aspirations for Europe / UK. I think it's insanity, but they probably foolishly think that's a real opportunity.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
BigW72 wrote:
Gerogia's death and all that timed up really nice with the Rams lease in St. Louis ending and the fact there was really no penalty for the Rams to pack up and leave.

Well, I mean, the NFL lost a lawsuit and had to pay the city like half a billion, but I don't think anyone was expecting that.

Quote:
I agree....the Jaguars were a better candidate for Vegas. I find the Chargers situation much more aggravating. The league should have forced the hands of the Spanos family to figuring something out other than the ugly step-child of LA. Ridiculous. Still....I think the league has real aspirations for Europe / UK. I think it's insanity, but they probably foolishly think that's a real opportunity.

The whole San Diego situation never made sense to me. They kept arguing for an indoor stadium in the city more associated with year-round perfect weather than any other because that way it could also be a convention floor for ComicCon. Mind-boggling. They could have built a normal NFL stadium seeing as they just built a downsized one for SDSU anyway.

It's an interesting thing about the NFL vis-a-vis other leagues that so many of these teams are still just owned by families who got in early and never let go. Basically every old-line owner in the NBA who was A Guy cashed out except Reinsdorf and the guy in San Antonio. Now they're all owned by hedge fund ghouls. The NFL still has dopes like the Spanoses and the McCaskeys and Al Davis's malformed son, people who can't put pants on without an instruction manual but just keep getting gifted money because people liked their dads.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.

More than any other team, the Red Sox now are the natural conclusion of sabermetrics/Moneyball. No one is allowed to mean anything to anyone outside of how they can be arbitraged for future players who won't be allowed to mean anything to anyone. Also, the games are boring and cost too much to go to. It's been a long road down from Johnny Damon's beard and Curt Schilling's sock.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Gerogia's death and all that timed up really nice with the Rams lease in St. Louis ending and the fact there was really no penalty for the Rams to pack up and leave.

Well, I mean, the NFL lost a lawsuit and had to pay the city like half a billion, but I don't think anyone was expecting that.

I missed that. The details of that case had to have been interesting.
$790 million....no clarification of how that was split between Kroenke and the NFL.
I'm guessing there was clear evidence that Kroenke had zero intention of ever keeping the team in St. Louis despite stringing them along for renovation and new stadium proposals. Not to mention, the league never planned on LA not having a team.
I don't hate St. Louis like most people, but I'm also not losing sleep over them not having an NFL team. That being said...clearly the NFL and Kroenke muscled their will and rightfully had to pay. Funny....according to wiki the TWA dome cost $280 million to build (equal to $498 million 2021). St. Louis got their money back and then some. Safe to say....I don't ever see an NFL team back in St. Louis.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/327 ... geles-790m
Quote:
"officials and the league knew as early as 2013 that the Rams planned to relocate but lied in denying it. The lawsuit said the league ignored its own relocation guidelines in allowing the move"

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 8:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79586
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.

More than any other team, the Red Sox now are the natural conclusion of sabermetrics/Moneyball. No one is allowed to mean anything to anyone outside of how they can be arbitraged for future players who won't be allowed to mean anything to anyone. Also, the games are boring and cost too much to go to. It's been a long road down from Johnny Damon's beard and Curt Schilling's sock.



This is why it's such a HUGE mistake for the White Sox not to re-sign Abreu. Forget that I'd bet a bunch that he will outperform whoever plays first for the Sox next season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.

More than any other team, the Red Sox now are the natural conclusion of sabermetrics/Moneyball. No one is allowed to mean anything to anyone outside of how they can be arbitraged for future players who won't be allowed to mean anything to anyone. Also, the games are boring and cost too much to go to. It's been a long road down from Johnny Damon's beard and Curt Schilling's sock.



This is why it's such a HUGE mistake for the White Sox not to re-sign Abreu. Forget that I'd bet a bunch that he will outperform whoever plays first for the Sox next season.

Agreed. Abreu is the least of the White Sox problems. He's on the downside of his career but I don't see an upgrade on the roster and there are way bigger problems and wastes of money on the team.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
BigW72 wrote:
$790 million....no clarification of how that was split between Kroenke and the NFL.
It just came out that the other teams paid $7.5 million and he paid $571 million. The other teams had to kick in some because they didn't follow their own relocation rules.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2512
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.

More than any other team, the Red Sox now are the natural conclusion of sabermetrics/Moneyball. No one is allowed to mean anything to anyone outside of how they can be arbitraged for future players who won't be allowed to mean anything to anyone. Also, the games are boring and cost too much to go to. It's been a long road down from Johnny Damon's beard and Curt Schilling's sock.



This is why it's such a HUGE mistake for the White Sox not to re-sign Abreu. Forget that I'd bet a bunch that he will outperform whoever plays first for the Sox next season.


Frank Thomas finished his career elsewhere, so did Buehrle. Also, Carlton Fisk was unceremoniously cut on the road. I got over it. I suspect most other Sox fans got over it as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Teams
PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2022 3:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Warren Newson wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
whitesoxfanfrank wrote:
Big hangover among Redsox fans because of the Betts trade. On top of that they might lose Bogarts next.

More than any other team, the Red Sox now are the natural conclusion of sabermetrics/Moneyball. No one is allowed to mean anything to anyone outside of how they can be arbitraged for future players who won't be allowed to mean anything to anyone. Also, the games are boring and cost too much to go to. It's been a long road down from Johnny Damon's beard and Curt Schilling's sock.



This is why it's such a HUGE mistake for the White Sox not to re-sign Abreu. Forget that I'd bet a bunch that he will outperform whoever plays first for the Sox next season.


Frank Thomas finished his career elsewhere, so did Buehrle. Also, Carlton Fisk was unceremoniously cut on the road. I got over it. I suspect most other Sox fans got over it as well.


I love Abreu but if they are serious about winning a championship they have to go with Vaughn at 1st base. Let Abreu go to a team that has a chance of winning a World Series. The White Sox owe that to him after screwing up the last three years.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 108 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group