It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 11:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
Ideally you can trade down a couple spots and still come away with extra picks and either Anderson or Carter.

If you can come out of the offseason with Anderson/Carter and Payne that is a great start to rebuilding this team.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Payne will get tagged. They have the cap space and aren't paying big bucks at quarterback They will cut Wentz and save 26 million against the cap


I'll have to take a look again but my previous research showed insiders did not think he would get tagged. They have a lot of talent on the DL to cover losing him. Cut Wentz and they will just have to pay another veteran QB. Starting Heineke is waving the white flag.


They have Sweat for 1 more year on his 5th option. They will exercise the 5th year option on Chase Young and have him pretty cheap for two more years. This really won't be a problem for them until next year when Sweat wants to get paid. Regardless I doubt they just let 25 year DT that put up 11+ sacks walk out the door for nothing. They could also tag and trade him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10767
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
good dolphin wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Payne will get tagged. They have the cap space and aren't paying big bucks at quarterback They will cut Wentz and save 26 million against the cap


I'll have to take a look again but my previous research showed insiders did not think he would get tagged. They have a lot of talent on the DL to cover losing him. Cut Wentz and they will just have to pay another veteran QB. Starting Heineke is waving the white flag.

Then there's the whole convincing a QB to come sign at Washington....Yes, money talks, but Washington is not really a good QB destination. If they trade for a QB fine, but I wouldn't be surprised at all of Heineke is the starter next year.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:55 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I read some draft preview that quoted Eberflus as saying the 3-technique is the “engine that makes everything go.” If they can’t find that in FA, I’d have to think they take Carter assuming Poles is on the same page.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 05, 2023 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4047
pizza_Place: Lino's
Will be paying more attention to Lovie vs the Colts than the glorified practice that will happen Sunday in Chicago.

Seems that Poles saw an opportunity to get the #1 pick and decided to sit Fields, have to think that Poles must have a detailed master plan for the offseason that must include trading down at least once in the first round, having the #1 pick almost allows for a double trade down with the accumulation of numerous early round picks.

A rare opportunity to rebuild your entire roster in one offseason, can see them with all new starters on the front seven defensively, and with nearly as many across the offense, so basically starting day one next year with a completely different team.

Poles has not exactly shown tremendous abilities on the pro scouting side, so you have to hope he can hit on a majority of his early round picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:18 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.


Extremley short arms, projects as a guard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

He isnt a top 5 guy. If you trade down into the middle of the 1st round then he is someone to look at.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:40 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

He isnt a top 5 guy. If you trade down into the middle of the 1st round then he is someone to look at.


Yeah, I was thinking more about the Falcons draft position.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:43 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

He isnt a top 5 guy. If you trade down into the middle of the 1st round then he is someone to look at.


Yeah, I was thinking more about the Falcons draft position.

That’s fine but I’d hope they get a haul if they’re dropping that far. Otherwise I’d rather they just take Carter or Anderson.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:51 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

He isnt a top 5 guy. If you trade down into the middle of the 1st round then he is someone to look at.


Yeah, I was thinking more about the Falcons draft position.

That’s fine but I’d hope they get a haul if they’re dropping that far. Otherwise I’d rather they just take Carter or Anderson.


They would be getting at least the Falcons first round pick next season. It's very likely that pick will be a top 10 pick. They'll probably get their first round pick the following season. I don't see the Bears getting more than 1 additional first round pick if they stay in the top 5. I also believe the Colts are a quarterback away from being a playoff team, so any future first round pick from them will probably suck.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:37 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


I can see this. It's like there are two paths to winning:

All world QB and above average skill players + above average defense

Game manager QB with elite RB and elite defense

Maybe you get Fields to a point where he's a tier above a game manager QB and build up the defense.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82148
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tell me why Peter Skoronski shouldn't be our first round pick.

He isnt a top 5 guy. If you trade down into the middle of the 1st round then he is someone to look at.


Yeah, I was thinking more about the Falcons draft position.

That’s fine but I’d hope they get a haul if they’re dropping that far. Otherwise I’d rather they just take Carter or Anderson.


They would be getting at least the Falcons first round pick next season. It's very likely that pick will be a top 10 pick. They'll probably get their first round pick the following season. I don't see the Bears getting more than 1 additional first round pick if they stay in the top 5. I also believe the Colts are a quarterback away from being a playoff team, so any future first round pick from them will probably suck.


Falcons drafted Ridder with a high 3 last year. They will let that one play out before trading away picks for another QB

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I'm not betting my career on that if I'm Poles.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10984
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields


The risk goes both ways - the rookie ends up being worse than Fields, yes, he could also be better. The fact that we're having this convo means Fields hasn't earned made man status, in which case it'd be absurd to even talk about replacing him.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:54 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
He’s an elite runner, which gets you half way there on offense before taking into account skill guys and linemen.

The D can be easily upgraded at 7 or 8 spots. Throw the resources there.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16760
pizza_Place: Salerno's
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields



Build around a running QB and you're holding your breath every time the QB takes off running. One hit and you're running QB based offense is rendered useless. after playing every game he needed to the prior 2 seasons, Lamar
Jackson hasn't been able to stay on the field all the way the last 2 seasons. Mahomes is a reluctant runner: last chance play to make a 1st down on 3rd and long or 4th down and Mahomes might take off running. Otherwise he's looking looking pass-first and pass-last--the running game is there, but it's all bonus.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Probably need to at least bring in kickers to push Santos. He's been great at FGs, but he missed 5 XPs this season. Not acceptable.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:44 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Hussra wrote:
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields



Build around a running QB and you're holding your breath every time the QB takes off running. One hit and you're running QB based offense is rendered useless. after playing every game he needed to the prior 2 seasons, Lamar
Jackson hasn't been able to stay on the field all the way the last 2 seasons. Mahomes is a reluctant runner: last chance play to make a 1st down on 3rd and long or 4th down and Mahomes might take off running. Otherwise he's looking looking pass-first and pass-last--the running game is there, but it's all bonus.

100%. And you hope you can fall back on defense when the guy is inevitably injured.

For this team, I don’t love the idea of trying to build a great offense around Fields if we’re not sure he can even use it.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Hussra wrote:
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields



Build around a running QB and you're holding your breath every time the QB takes off running. One hit and you're running QB based offense is rendered useless. after playing every game he needed to the prior 2 seasons, Lamar
Jackson hasn't been able to stay on the field all the way the last 2 seasons. Mahomes is a reluctant runner: last chance play to make a 1st down on 3rd and long or 4th down and Mahomes might take off running. Otherwise he's looking looking pass-first and pass-last--the running game is there, but it's all bonus.

100%. And you hope you can fall back on defense when the guy is inevitably injured.

For this team, I don’t love the idea of trying to build a great offense around Fields if we’re not sure he can even use it.


Would you bet your future on Justin Fields becoming a good passer? If not, you have to trade him this offseason.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 1:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Would you bet your future on the QB you take with the #1 pick being better than Justin Fields?



Mahomes is/has been throwing to guys like Travis Kelce, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Valdes-scantling, Tyreek Hill. Of course he is looking pass first.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:01 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23842
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Hussra wrote:
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields



Build around a running QB and you're holding your breath every time the QB takes off running. One hit and you're running QB based offense is rendered useless. after playing every game he needed to the prior 2 seasons, Lamar
Jackson hasn't been able to stay on the field all the way the last 2 seasons. Mahomes is a reluctant runner: last chance play to make a 1st down on 3rd and long or 4th down and Mahomes might take off running. Otherwise he's looking looking pass-first and pass-last--the running game is there, but it's all bonus.

100%. And you hope you can fall back on defense when the guy is inevitably injured.

For this team, I don’t love the idea of trying to build a great offense around Fields if we’re not sure he can even use it.


Would you bet your future on Justin Fields becoming a good passer? If not, you have to trade him this offseason.

I wouldn’t but I don’t think anybody who’s watched him objectively would either. If I were a GM, no way I’d bet my livelihood trading meaningful assets for him.

So either the Bears double up at QB or they embrace having an elite runner at the position and hope he can mature as a passer. I’d like to see them improve his protection and maybe get a guy who can catch it out of the backfield late in the draft but avoid using big dollars/high draft picks on offensive weapons.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Would you bet your future on the QB you take with the #1 pick being better than Justin Fields?



Mahomes is/has been throwing to guys like Travis Kelce, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Valdes-scantling, Tyreek Hill. Of course he is looking pass first.


I wouldn't bet my future on Fields or the projected top 2 quarterbacks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
But Poles sort of has to.

Or go out and get Derek Carr because the RAIDERS owe him a ton of bread.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Hussra wrote:
billypootons wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’m still convinced that this version of Fields is fine if you can turn around the defense. Run the ball, play defense better and you’re a playoff team.


i'm willing to build a team and offense around fields. he's far from perfect and has faults, but if you go rookie QB again you run the risk of ending up worse off. based on what i've seen, i'm willing to work with him and see where it goes. would take a crazy draft pick haul for me to move fields



Build around a running QB and you're holding your breath every time the QB takes off running. One hit and you're running QB based offense is rendered useless. after playing every game he needed to the prior 2 seasons, Lamar
Jackson hasn't been able to stay on the field all the way the last 2 seasons. Mahomes is a reluctant runner: last chance play to make a 1st down on 3rd and long or 4th down and Mahomes might take off running. Otherwise he's looking looking pass-first and pass-last--the running game is there, but it's all bonus.

100%. And you hope you can fall back on defense when the guy is inevitably injured.

For this team, I don’t love the idea of trying to build a great offense around Fields if we’re not sure he can even use it.


Would you bet your future on Justin Fields becoming a good passer? If not, you have to trade him this offseason.

I wouldn’t but I don’t think anybody who’s watched him objectively would either. If I were a GM, no way I’d bet my livelihood trading meaningful assets for him.

So either the Bears double up at QB or they embrace having an elite runner at the position and hope he can mature as a passer. I’d like to see them improve his protection and maybe get a guy who can catch it out of the backfield late in the draft but avoid using big dollars/high draft picks on offensive weapons.


Why are you avoiding offensive weapons? When you said you wouldn't build around Fields, I agreed, but I assumed you meant you wouldn't want to draft guys specifically because their style of plays meshes with Fields. Unless I'm reading your above post incorrectly, it looks like "building around Fields" means something different to the both of us.

I do want weapons. I would draft/acquire legit studs at WR or TE etc because to me I need those players irrespective of who is at QB. If Fields sucks then I find a QB who can leverage the weapons in front of him. In other words, I don't want to skip drafting the next Megatron (I know there's prolly no Megatron in the draft, but just using him as an example), just because my QB (Fields) can't capitalize on Megatron's talents. To me, it's give me Megatron because he's the best player available, and if the QB can't use him, I'll find one someone who can.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10767
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Frank Coztansa wrote:
But Poles sort of has to.

Or go out and get Derek Carr because the RAIDERS owe him a ton of bread.

Jimmy G and Geno Smith are the other 2 options...or you try and get Daniel Jones.

None of these are great Long-term options, but IF Poles is tied to the success of Fields by keeping him another year, they have to trade him away while it's possible.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Matthew Stafford will probably be available too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Jimmy G, Geno Smith?!?! Jesus what the fuck is wrong with some of you people?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: This Ends in Antioch and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group