It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6545
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nas wrote:
Cashman wrote:
billypootons wrote:
so the last time #1 got traded was the jared goff draft

Quote:
Tennessee sent the No. 1 overall pick, the No. 113 overall pick and the No. 177 overall pick to Los Angeles. In exchange Tennessee received the Nos. 15, 43, 45 and 76 picks in the 2016 draft, plus a 2017 first-rounder and a 2017 third-rounder.


that seems like the perfect haul for the bears for a team with this many needs.


I think 2 teams are gonna be aggressive to get a QB, and that is the Colts and Panthers.


It sure sounds like Ballard is pushing his chips in the middle of the table.


Depends on the return. You HAVE to get a 1st next year in the deal. If it's the Panthers, you gotta get a couple 2nds and a 1st next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Cashman wrote:
Nas wrote:
Cashman wrote:
billypootons wrote:
so the last time #1 got traded was the jared goff draft

Quote:
Tennessee sent the No. 1 overall pick, the No. 113 overall pick and the No. 177 overall pick to Los Angeles. In exchange Tennessee received the Nos. 15, 43, 45 and 76 picks in the 2016 draft, plus a 2017 first-rounder and a 2017 third-rounder.


that seems like the perfect haul for the bears for a team with this many needs.


I think 2 teams are gonna be aggressive to get a QB, and that is the Colts and Panthers.


It sure sounds like Ballard is pushing his chips in the middle of the table.


Depends on the return. You HAVE to get a 1st next year in the deal. If it's the Panthers, you gotta get a couple 2nds and a 1st next year.


Yeah, I don't see many scenarios where I trade my #1 pick without getting a future first too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4050
pizza_Place: Lino's
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
If we got Jeffrey Simmons than hopefully it means we would be ditching this archaic, obsolete Tampa 2 defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6545
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Let's say you trade with the colts, and when your pick comes up, the 2nd QB is still sitting there? Do the Panthers call you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
man of few opinions wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


You trade up to ensure you get your guy. Leaving it to chance when you don't have job security is foolish.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


Their GM just said he failed the team because he couldn't solve the QB problem. They've acquired Rivers, Wentz, Ryan, Foles and who knows who else once Luck retired. It's all failed miserably except maybe Rivers, who performed respectably enough. With the GM's comments, plus their history, you have to assume he's either drafting a top 2 QB prospect this year, or he's acquiring Burrow, Mahomes, Allen, etc. Since the latter is unlikely, makes me think he's down with ensuring he gets a shot at a top 2 QB prospect.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:

Yeah, I don't see many scenarios where I trade my #1 pick without getting a future first too.


Yep, I'm looking to the dumbass (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky trade, the dumbass Lance trade, and the Goff trade as models for a deal for the no 1 pick.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:

Yeah, I don't see many scenarios where I trade my #1 pick without getting a future first too.


Yep, I'm looking to the dumbass (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky trade, the dumbass Lance trade, and the Goff trade as models for a deal for the no 1 pick.


Even the (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky trade is too light. All but the Bears pick turned into studs, but I need more. The Lance, Watson, and Wilson trades are the bar for me.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
veganfan21 wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


Their GM just said he failed the team because he couldn't solve the QB problem. They've acquired Rivers, Wentz, Ryan, Foles and who knows who else once Luck retired. It's all failed miserably except maybe Rivers, who performed respectably enough. With the GM's comments, plus their history, you have to assume he's either drafting a top 2 QB prospect this year, or he's acquiring Burrow, Mahomes, Allen, etc. Since the latter is unlikely, makes me think he's down with ensuring he gets a shot at a top 2 QB prospect.

The problem with this is that there is no standout MUST HAVE number 1 qb. Each have flaws and if you already have a top 4 pick you are assured of getting one of them without trading up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
The problem with this is that there is no standout MUST HAVE number 1 qb. Each have flaws and if you already have a top 4 pick you are assured of getting one of them without trading up.



I agree there's no clear-cut no 1 but you're assuming no one is going to scoop Indy by trading in front of them to grab either Stroud or whatever QB. If he wants a top 4 QB, fine, he can stay put, but if he wants either Young or whoever ends up no 2, then he has to trade up and not hope something breaks his way. With what he said today, it's clear he's desperate for a QB.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Bears and Cardinals swap #1 and #3 with Hopkins going to the Bears?



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23851
pizza_Place: Pizanos
They just gave Murray a billion dollars. Move down two spots for a WR on the downside of his career coming off a steroid suspension who wants a new deal?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He's too old and may not be a top 10 receiver.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
In 1/2 a season this year he had 64 catches 717 yards. He can still play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
In 1/2 a season this year he had 64 catches 717 yards. He can still play.


If they want to do what Dallas did with Cooper in order to dump his salary, I would listen. A rebuilding team shouldn't trade a #1 pick for an aging receiver.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82148
man of few opinions wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


like I said before, we now need to hope for some strong pro days from these QB

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Indy does make the most sense given you get a boatload in return while staying in the top 5.

There are tons of interesting scenarios out there already, did see one where the Titans pony up Jeffrey Simmons and a bunch of picks, also seeing stuff about the Raiders putting together a package that would include Davante Adams.

If you do trade down to 4 and Levis is there, you likely will get tons of offers to move down again, shaping up to be the most interesting first round in Bears history.

Indy doesn't make any sense. they can take Stroud or whomever at 4 without giving up a thing. Young is no sure thing to give up a kings ransom for when you can get Stroud 2 picks later. Naturally other teams trading up can change things but as they stand now im not trading shit to move up.


Their GM just said he failed the team because he couldn't solve the QB problem. They've acquired Rivers, Wentz, Ryan, Foles and who knows who else once Luck retired. It's all failed miserably except maybe Rivers, who performed respectably enough. With the GM's comments, plus their history, you have to assume he's either drafting a top 2 QB prospect this year, or he's acquiring Burrow, Mahomes, Allen, etc. Since the latter is unlikely, makes me think he's down with ensuring he gets a shot at a top 2 QB prospect.

The problem with this is that there is no standout MUST HAVE number 1 qb. Each have flaws and if you already have a top 4 pick you are assured of getting one of them without trading up.

Someone would have to destroy the combine to not have Young be the clear #1.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I think he means #1 as in the best available, not necessarily #1 as in a superstar who will define a generation. You move heaven and earth to draft the generational superstar. You're not as motivated to move up to draft a guy whose merely most likely the best QB available in 2023. I think Indy is motivated simply because of their history and what their GM said today.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
I think he means #1 as in the best available, not necessarily #1 as in a superstar who will define a generation. You move heaven and earth to draft the generational superstar. You're not as motivated to move up to draft a guy whose merely most likely the best QB available in 2023. I think Indy is motivated simply because of their history and what their GM said today.

He seems to think there isn't going to be a massive difference between the top 3 quarterbacks. Young will be far more covered than anyone else.

Young isn't as exciting as Lawrence or Andrew Luck but he's far ahead of most other qbs. Look at how desperate teams were for Lance and Wilson and Young is better than them.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This is a sincere question since I don't follow college football. Is young merely the best prospect this year or is he one of the best college QB prospects of the past 5-10 years. The former (i.e. tallest midget syndrome) is not necessarily impressive but again I'm not familiar with any of these guys.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
This is a sincere question since I don't follow college football. Is young merely the best prospect this year or is he one of the best college QB prospects of the past 5-10 years. The former (i.e. tallest midget syndrome) is not necessarily impressive but again I'm not familiar with any of these guys.

Burrow and Lawrence are pretty far ahead of him. He could be third behind them. I think he's on par with Murray.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
What makes him the best prospect in his class?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Poles is definitely open to trading Fields.

https://youtu.be/9kUlHKALEpM

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
What makes him the best prospect in his class?

My guy says he's Drew Brees.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The question isn’t if Bryce Young is good enough to draft number one overall, the question is, is he good enough for Indy to use multiple year’s draft choices to pick up? Bryce Young might be the clear cut number one of this class, but he also is only marginally better than a couple others. Indy sacrificing two potentially high first round draft picks for Bryce Young when they can have CJ Stroud at number four seems like a big gamble to me. If the Bears trade fields, all of this changes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91921
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
The question isn’t if Bryce Young is good enough to draft number one overall, the question is, is he good enough for Indy to use multiple year’s draft choices to pick up? Bryce Young might be the clear cut number one of this class, but he also is only marginally better than a couple others. Indy sacrificing two potentially high first round draft picks for Bryce Young when they can have CJ Stroud at number four seems like a big gamble to me. If the Bears trade fields, all of this changes.

I think Stroud will fall in the draft.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
The question isn’t if Bryce Young is good enough to draft number one overall, the question is, is he good enough for Indy to use multiple year’s draft choices to pick up? Bryce Young might be the clear cut number one of this class, but he also is only marginally better than a couple others. Indy sacrificing two potentially high first round draft picks for Bryce Young when they can have CJ Stroud at number four seems like a big gamble to me. If the Bears trade fields, all of this changes.


Again you're assuming no team is gonna leapfrog Indy to take Stroud. A savvy GM should plant that seed in Indy's mind so they're inclined to trade up.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2023 7:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
The question isn’t if Bryce Young is good enough to draft number one overall, the question is, is he good enough for Indy to use multiple year’s draft choices to pick up? Bryce Young might be the clear cut number one of this class, but he also is only marginally better than a couple others. Indy sacrificing two potentially high first round draft picks for Bryce Young when they can have CJ Stroud at number four seems like a big gamble to me. If the Bears trade fields, all of this changes.


Again you're assuming no team is gonna leapfrog Indy to take Stroud. A savvy GM should plant that seed in Indy's mind so they're inclined to trade up.


Indy will not allow their quarterback needy divisional rival to get the best quarterback in the draft. Irsay is too competitive and Ballard wants to save his job

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Harvard Dan and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group