It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 55  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
MANY believe Shanahan and John Lynch are great evaluators. They took Solomon Thomas 3rd in the draft and traded 3 first round picks+ for Trey Young. It's all a gamble. You have to be aggressive for your guys.

I think that is a perfect example of being TOO aggressive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16761
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Nas wrote:
MANY believe Shanahan and John Lynch are great evaluators. They took Solomon Thomas 3rd in the draft and traded 3 first round picks+ for Trey Young. It's all a gamble. You have to be aggressive for your guys.



Screw T Young, they should've tanked for Wembanyama


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 1:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hussra wrote:
Nas wrote:
MANY believe Shanahan and John Lynch are great evaluators. They took Solomon Thomas 3rd in the draft and traded 3 first round picks+ for Trey Young. It's all a gamble. You have to be aggressive for your guys.



Screw T Young, they should've tanked for Wembanyama


They should have drafted Mahomes over Solomon Thomas. No one talks about that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6272
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
The pressure is on Poles. By 2024 he could be a hero or the next loser Bears GM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16761
pizza_Place: Salerno's
blackhawksfan wrote:
The pressure is on Poles. By 2024 he could be a hero or the next loser Bears GM.


Poles has at least 3 bodies to throw under the bus before they come for his job:

Fields
OC
HC

only then does Poles' number come up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:55 am
Posts: 6545
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Hussra wrote:
blackhawksfan wrote:
The pressure is on Poles. By 2024 he could be a hero or the next loser Bears GM.


Poles has at least 3 bodies to throw under the bus before they come for his job:

Fields
OC
HC

only then does Poles' number come up.


I think he has about 3-4 more years before there is heat on him. Unless he completely blows this draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16761
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Cashman wrote:
I think he has about 3-4 more years before there is heat on him. Unless he completely blows this draft.



That sounds right, yeah. Probably why he'll stick with Fields. Trading Fields and having the 1 in 100 chance Fields changes the way he's played QB for the last decade come to fruition on another team next season would be about the only way he'd get run out of town earlier, unfortunately.

I hope Poles has a list of potential trade scenarios for Fields on his laptop desktop that he checks and updates regularly. It probably wouldn't come out until well-after this off-season. But if Fields remains Fields next season and on the Bears and it comes out that Poles' had a trade offer or offers for multiple 1st rounders for Fields...that's gonna sting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
blackhawksfan wrote:
The pressure is on Poles. By 2024 he could be a hero or the next loser Bears GM.



I think he will do just peachy. It took guts for him to cut the roster and free up free agency money and commit to Fields. And unless he is a total dolt, it will be very hard to fail to bring in good free agents and draft good to excellent players to replace the crap we saw on the field last season. To me, he needs to take good advice from seasoned experts and coaches and just DO IT intelligently.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Hussra wrote:
Cashman wrote:
I think he has about 3-4 more years before there is heat on him. Unless he completely blows this draft.



That sounds right, yeah. Probably why he'll stick with Fields. Trading Fields and having the 1 in 100 chance Fields changes the way he's played QB for the last decade come to fruition on another team next season would be about the only way he'd get run out of town earlier, unfortunately.

I hope Poles has a list of potential trade scenarios for Fields on his laptop desktop that he checks and updates regularly. It probably wouldn't come out until well-after this off-season. But if Fields remains Fields next season and on the Bears and it comes out that Poles' had a trade offer or offers for multiple 1st rounders for Fields...that's gonna sting.



Totally disagree. Fields is leagues better than any quarterback on any "draft list". Next to Mahomes who also had his own doubters in the NFL when he came out, Fields has a generational qb future. 6/4". 4.5 speed, 235", powerful arm strength, terrific escapability, etc. And he had NO HELP whatsoever in coaching with Thibs and no physical assistance with Eberflus. So he took his lumps and still did well over-all.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6272
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
I'm not saying Poles will get fired if he doesn't have a good off-season, but Bears fan will have a meltdown because the bar is being set so high. Listen to sports radio. It's like the 3 win season didn't happen and they are headed to the playoffs if they make a couple of good moves


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
blackhawksfan wrote:
I'm not saying Poles will get fired if he doesn't have a good off-season, but Bears fan will have a meltdown because the bar is being set so high. Listen to sports radio. It's like the 3 win season didn't happen and they are headed to the playoffs if they make a couple of good moves


The bar needs to be set high. They have to set their goal high. For starters, they are playing in a very weak division. they also will have the weakest schedule in the NFL. They have DOUBLE the free agent money of the next team and a draft position which is virtually guaranteed them getting them 4-5 prime time players, oncluding two of the top five players in the entire draft. This TALENT INFUSION is going to be huge.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Last edited by The Hawk on Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38673
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: Both teams mentioned in this thread being the ones to move up are in the mix , Sparkles !!

Image

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91924
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

I say the odds of young OR any other rookie quarterback in this draft becoming stars are so long that if the bears or anyone else take Young, I’ll take my chances with the next guy up OR draft a different position with that pick OR trade down to someone blinded by qb lust and acquire more picks and take a qb later on.

It's amazing trades ever happen in the draft. Just draft someone else.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
I like the possibility of Pittman, the number four pick, a high second round pick this year and a number one and number two pick next year. It will bring them a number one receiver, a pro bowl defensive player as well additional draft capital to use in further deals or banked for next year. I could also see the Bear's trading down again at #4 to get an additional number one for a team wanting Carter or someone else at 4.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6272
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
The Hawk wrote:
I like the possibility of Pittman, the number four pick, a high second round pick this year and a number one and number two pick next year. It will bring them a number one receiver, a pro bowl defensive player as well additional draft capital to use in further deals or banked for next year. I could also see the Bear's trading down again at #4 to get an additional number one for a team wanting Carter or someone else at 4.


Then you woke up from your dream.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 4:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14911
pizza_Place: Grazianos
blackhawksfan wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
I like the possibility of Pittman, the number four pick, a high second round pick this year and a number one and number two pick next year. It will bring them a number one receiver, a pro bowl defensive player as well additional draft capital to use in further deals or banked for next year. I could also see the Bear's trading down again at #4 to get an additional number one for a team wanting Carter or someone else at 4.


Then you woke up from your dream.


That's pretty much what the "trade" sites are predicting:)

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

I say the odds of young OR any other rookie quarterback in this draft becoming stars are so long that if the bears or anyone else take Young, I’ll take my chances with the next guy up OR draft a different position with that pick OR trade down to someone blinded by qb lust and acquire more picks and take a qb later on.

It's amazing trades ever happen in the draft. Just draft someone else.

It’s amazing how often that simple concept is lost on so many.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91924
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

I say the odds of young OR any other rookie quarterback in this draft becoming stars are so long that if the bears or anyone else take Young, I’ll take my chances with the next guy up OR draft a different position with that pick OR trade down to someone blinded by qb lust and acquire more picks and take a qb later on.

It's amazing trades ever happen in the draft. Just draft someone else.

It’s amazing how often that simple concept is lost on so many.

Is it that hard to name a QB you think will be better than Young?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 5:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
badrogue17 wrote:
:lol: Both teams mentioned in this thread being the ones to move up are in the mix , Sparkles !!

Image


I won't comment on Kap's reporting history, but I would take a 2024 1st round pick over Michael Pittman.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23859
pizza_Place: Pizanos
How valuable is Pittman to a team that just used the equivalent of a first on Claypool and is still learning whether their QB can throw the ball?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Brick wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
If the Texans give up a bunch of draft equity to move from 2 to 1, the gm should be fired immediately, even before he makes the #1 pick.

I'll take Young. You pick another rookie QB. I say Young far outperforms whoever you pick. Do you think I'm wrong?

I say the odds of young OR any other rookie quarterback in this draft becoming stars are so long that if the bears or anyone else take Young, I’ll take my chances with the next guy up OR draft a different position with that pick OR trade down to someone blinded by qb lust and acquire more picks and take a qb later on.

It's amazing trades ever happen in the draft. Just draft someone else.

It’s amazing how often that simple concept is lost on so many.

Is it that hard to name a QB you think will be better than Young?

It’s irrelevant to what I’m saying. He may very well be the best. Likely even if you’d like. But it’s a coin flip and not worth sacrificing a great deal for when you can get another coin-flip of your own for free.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91924
Location: To the left of my post
The whole point is it isn't a coin flip. Young is a far better prospect.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
The coin flip I’m talking about isnt whether he is a better prospect. It’s whether he will be an elite QB in the NFL. That is FAR from a guarantee.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
How valuable is Pittman to a team that just used the equivalent of a first on Claypool and is still learning whether their QB can throw the ball?


I think Claypool and Pittman are similar players. I think Claypool is better. The Bears need a receiver with size and/or speed to play opposite of Claypool. Mooney should be the slot guy.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91924
Location: To the left of my post
man of few opinions wrote:
The coin flip I’m talking about isnt whether he is a better prospect. It’s whether he will be an elite QB in the NFL. That is FAR from a guarantee.

You pay to move up to increase your chances though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Sure you can. GMs do it every year, gamble everything on a hunch. Occasionally it works out. I think it unnecessarily reckless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
No more #2 receivers. Not interested in Pittman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 6:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
No more #2 receivers. Not interested in Pittman


He's going to want an extension this year. For a guy targeted so much, he doesn't make any explosive plays.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 8:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38263
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Caller Bob wrote:
No more #2 receivers. Not interested in Pittman



We can agree on this Bob.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2023 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No more #2 receivers. Not interested in Pittman


He's going to want an extension this year. For a guy targeted so much, he doesn't make any explosive plays.


Not defending Pittman but his QBs seemed to enjoy throwing 360 degree left handed interceptions to defensive ends (Wentz) and to the occasional defensive back (Ryan).

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1640 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 55  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: KDdidit and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group