It is currently Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16457
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Spiegel is orgasmic, likely because this means Fields is the guy.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23740
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Moore’s contract is perfectly reasonable and won’t really stop them from spending money


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


You weren't getting a #1 WR in free agency.




No, but you could have grabbed one in the draft.. this is supposed to be a rebuild. Poles is treating this like he’s 1 player away.



Not only that, but..


Traded for Claypool, has Mooney, drafted Velus Jones (basically special teams ace for Tenn that occasionally played WR.. who was also 25 when they drafted him)


Early signs point to Poles not knowing what the hell he’s doing. As a fan, I hope for the best.. but I’m planning for the worst

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
fantastic trade. what if will levis is still there at 9 just like fields was

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Spiegel is orgasmic, likely because this means Fields is the guy.


also good chance we get the #1 pick next year.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82143
billypootons wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


moore already has a long term deal in place at a reasonable price


just researched it and that is great asset.

They probably would have paid that kind of money to Jakobi Meyers.

I'm just not sure about more. Every great receiver is a diva, so that's what you get and you live with it. Give me 2019 DJ Moore and I'm happy. He just seemed less and less team oriented

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
billypootons wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


moore already has a long term deal in place at a reasonable price




Doesn’t matter. A rookie would be cheaper while adding another talent to your roster. Look at it this way, if you’re going to trade the pick for extra picks.. that veteran you traded for takes one of those picks away.. his contract also subtracts a potential free agent you may have otherwise signed.


It’s bad value, but that’s my take. Poles did not get the best value for that #1.. especially moving it this far out from the draft..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23740
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
IkeSouth wrote:
fantastic trade. what if will levis is still there at 9 just like fields was


Bears gave up a 1st to get Fields at 11, Bears get at least another first if someone trades up to get Levis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23837
pizza_Place: Pizanos
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


You weren't getting a #1 WR in free agency.




No, but you could have grabbed one in the draft.. this is supposed to be a rebuild. Poles is treating this like he’s 1 player away.



Not only that, but..


Traded for Claypool, has Mooney, drafted Velus Jones (basically special teams ace for Tenn that occasionally played WR.. who was also 25 when they drafted him)


Early signs point to Poles not knowing what the hell he’s doing. As a fan, I hope for the best.. but I’m planning for the worst

You’re absolutely correct he’s over allocating resources to the position, especially when they don’t know if the QB can throw the football.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


You weren't getting a #1 WR in free agency.




No, but you could have grabbed one in the draft.. this is supposed to be a rebuild. Poles is treating this like he’s 1 player away.



Not only that, but..


Traded for Claypool, has Mooney, drafted Velus Jones (basically special teams ace for Tenn that occasionally played WR.. who was also 25 when they drafted him)


Early signs point to Poles not knowing what the hell he’s doing. As a fan, I hope for the best.. but I’m planning for the worst


He just turned one player into five……if he was acting like he was one player away, he would have kept the number one overall pick.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23837
pizza_Place: Pizanos
billypootons wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


moore already has a long term deal in place at a reasonable price

How to team friendly contracts for #1 receivers usually end?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16457
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
It’s hilarious listening to these guys saying Moore stats aren’t great because he hasn’t had a good qb…well guess who’s throwing to him now?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
denisdman wrote:
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


You weren't getting a #1 WR in free agency.




No, but you could have grabbed one in the draft.. this is supposed to be a rebuild. Poles is treating this like he’s 1 player away.



Not only that, but..


Traded for Claypool, has Mooney, drafted Velus Jones (basically special teams ace for Tenn that occasionally played WR.. who was also 25 when they drafted him)


Early signs point to Poles not knowing what the hell he’s doing. As a fan, I hope for the best.. but I’m planning for the worst


He just turned one player into five……if he was acting like he was one player away, he would have kept the number one overall pick.




That’s fine. I think he could have gotten more, and remained in better position to take an elite talent this year. But like the Mitch trade, all I can do is speculate


He gave up waaaay too early

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82143
It seems like he's following the Eagles and their very smart GM blueprint

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10980
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
NME wrote:
billypootons wrote:
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


moore already has a long term deal in place at a reasonable price




Doesn’t matter. A rookie would be cheaper while adding another talent to your roster. Look at it this way, if you’re going to trade the pick for extra picks.. that veteran you traded for takes one of those picks away.. his contract also subtracts a potential free agent you may have otherwise signed.


It’s bad value, but that’s my take. Poles did not get the best value for that #1.. especially moving it this far out from the draft..


bears have so much cap space they'll have to spend stupid to spend it all. rookies dont always hit. they are still getting a good/great player at 9. especially if 4 qb's go before their pick


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10980
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
good dolphin wrote:
It seems like he's following the Eagles and their very smart GM blueprint


you can track fields vs hurts first two years and find them to be pretty similar. here's hoping fields makes the year 3 jump with his new #1 WR like hurts did


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
good dolphin wrote:
It seems like he's following the Eagles and their very smart GM blueprint




The Eagles still had the leftovers of a super bowl winning roster when they started with this current regime.. Poles doesn’t have that luxury

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16457
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Parkins essentially saying it’s on Fields now to produce, as he has four good weapons at WR/TE.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23740
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Time for updated too early mocks!



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
They almost have to go O-line at #9 if they stay.. unless they cash out as much as they can in free agency

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10980
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
NME wrote:
They almost have to go O-line at #9 if they stay.. unless they cash out as much as they can in free agency


what if they find their pace and someone gives up their 23 and 24 first to take the last qb at 9? that'd be fun


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16457
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Seems like Orlando Brown should be a no brainer.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
This will be an interesting thread to bump after a couple years. I think Poles flinched, now I’ll sit back, hope for the best, and see what happens

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
billypootons wrote:
NME wrote:
They almost have to go O-line at #9 if they stay.. unless they cash out as much as they can in free agency


what if they find their pace and someone gives up their 23 and 24 first to take the last qb at 9? that'd be fun




That would be fun.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 4993
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Seems like Orlando Brown should be a no brainer.




I’m wondering about this too.. part of why I mentioned cashing out in FA in a prior post.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38672
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
billypootons wrote:
wow, that is a good deal. 24 1st should be top 15 at worst, possibly top 6-7. DJ moore is only 26 and under contract for a bit. lovie really has earned some type of job with the organization with that win


Carolina is poised to be a playoff team next year.

Moore demands 100+ targets or he openly pouts...and he drops half the balls thrown to him

So he’s your typical wide receiver.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19333
Feels like a panic trade. Have to get more than one additional first for the first pick of the draft if your sending it this early.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40598
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
NME wrote:
Not only did you lose a shot at an elite player this year, you absorb a guy who you have to pay right away (meaning no rookie deal) which also most likely removes a would be signing in free agency.. net negative imo


He was extended three years.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I hope DJ Moore is cool with blocking and running sprints. Should get some cardio ans resistance training every Sunday. Beats having to pay for a gym membership I guess.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57196
My first reaction is not enough for dropping to 9. I agree with dolphin that it should have been a higher 2nd rounder than 61. But I am really happy with getting a first next year. 2 first round picks in next years draft is going to be really nice.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group