It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 3:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 570 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23999
pizza_Place: Pizanos
good dolphin wrote:
I'll admit, I never heard of Caitlin Clark before this weekend.

I couldn't name a player in WNCAAB. I knew some of the coaches.

That won't change

That the discussion now is about which adjectives have been applied to old coaches suggests most are right there with you.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
Are you sure? He is certainly considered as much of a 'genius' as anyone in college basketball.

Who are the geniuses in college basketball?


Rick Pitino. Still
Mark Few.
Bryce Drew.
Bill Self.
Tom Izzo. Still.

That's a pretty terrible list but it's mostly just you picking current coaches with national titles and then Mark Few.


And each of the people on that list (save maybe for (Bryce Drew) have had the "genius" label attached to them and will be in the Hall of Fame. Ed Cooley won't and even you (the dude that mentioned him remember) didn't hit him with the "genius" label. Best you could claim is that he is a "good coach". Which was never the point.

This is why I'm having a hard time figuring out what you mean by "genius" coach. The guys you picked either have national titles or it's the best coach in NCAA history to never win an NCAA title. You are correct that all of them will be in the Hall of Fame but everyone makes the Hall Of Fame. Gene Keady just got in. Ed Cooley may very well make it too.
Since you brought it up, I'll also point out that black coaches have made the Hall Of Fame but it isn't a huge number because it wasn't as common before for non-white guys to be coaches.

Again, your list is just people that have great coaching resumes. It's not surprising that guys with NCAA titles and a ton of Final Fours would be considered better that just about everyone else in the history of the sport.

I gave you one name of a coach who is considered one of the best in the game right now and he has a national coach of the year to prove it and teams were all going hard after him to replace their coach. Jerome Tang was the coach of the year this year too but he's only in his first year of being a head coach so I don't know if he can qualify for your "genius" tag.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
Are you sure? He is certainly considered as much of a 'genius' as anyone in college basketball.

Who are the geniuses in college basketball?


Rick Pitino. Still
Mark Few.
Bryce Drew.
Bill Self.
Tom Izzo. Still.

That's a pretty terrible list but it's mostly just you picking current coaches with national titles and then Mark Few.


And each of the people on that list (save maybe for (Bryce Drew) have had the "genius" label attached to them and will be in the Hall of Fame. Ed Cooley won't and even you (the dude that mentioned him remember) didn't hit him with the "genius" label. Best you could claim is that he is a "good coach". Which was never the point.

This is why I'm having a hard time figuring out what you mean by "genius" coach. The guys you picked either have national titles or it's the best coach in NCAA history to never win an NCAA title. You are correct that all of them will be in the Hall of Fame but everyone makes the Hall Of Fame. Gene Keady just got in. Ed Cooley may very well make it too.
Since you brought it up, I'll also point out that black coaches have made the Hall Of Fame but it isn't a huge number because it wasn't as common before for non-white guys to be coaches.

Again, your list is just people that have great coaching resumes. It's not surprising that guys with NCAA titles and a ton of Final Fours would be considered better that just about everyone else in the history of the sport.

I gave you one name of a coach who is considered one of the best in the game right now and he has a national coach of the year to prove it and teams were all going hard after him to replace their coach. Jerome Tang was the coach of the year this year too but he's only in his first year of being a head coach so I don't know if he can qualify for your "genius" tag.


I just gave you an example of how well their assistants did simply by being associated with their "genius". Their assistants were able to parlay their associations into jobs that your guy Ed Cooley could only hope to dream of. You claim that he was in hot demand yet he had to settle for a job that hasn't been attractive in about 20 years.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry Boers isn't exactly a go-to for baskteball knowledge.


But Brick is? And the larger point is this. John Thompson was never hit with the "genius" label. Nor has any other black coach in the history of college basketball been tabbed with the label.

John Thompson is in the Hall Of Fame as you used as evidence. Thompson is undoubtedly considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. He won national coach of the year in two different seasons.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry Boers isn't exactly a go-to for baskteball knowledge.


But Brick is? And the larger point is this. John Thompson was never hit with the "genius" label. Nor has any other black coach in the history of college basketball been tabbed with the label.

John Thompson is in the Hall Of Fame as you used as evidence. Thompson is undoubtedly considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. He won national coach of the year in two different seasons.


Yeah and never considered a genius coach either. Neither was Ray Meyer. Also in the Hall of Fame. And I doubt that Ed Cooley gets there either.
Jay Wright is another that is considered a genius coach too. Billy Donovan was also considered a genius when he coached at the college level. Hell the willingness of MANY to still accept him at the pro level is based solely off of what he did in college

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
I just gave you an example of how well their assistants did simply by being associated with their "genius". Their assistants were able to parlay their associations into jobs that your guy Ed Cooley could only hope to dream of. You claim that he was in hot demand yet he had to settle for a job that hasn't been attractive in about 20 years.
Assistants from programs that win national championships end up getting other jobs. That isn't surprising.

I find it interesting you claim to not watch any college basketball but you also seem well versed in the status of places like Georgetown in the current landscape.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry Boers isn't exactly a go-to for baskteball knowledge.


But Brick is? And the larger point is this. John Thompson was never hit with the "genius" label. Nor has any other black coach in the history of college basketball been tabbed with the label.

John Thompson is in the Hall Of Fame as you used as evidence. Thompson is undoubtedly considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. He won national coach of the year in two different seasons.


Yeah and never considered a genius coach either. Neither was Ray Meyer. Also in the Hall of Fame. And I doubt that Ed Cooley gets there either.
Jay Wright is another that is considered a genius coach too. Billy Donovan was also considered a genius when he coached at the college level. Hell the willingness of MANY to still accept him at the pro level is based solely off of what he did in college
John Thompson is considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. I think it's just your perception that he wasn't considered as smart as others.

You keep on mentioning coaches who won national titles as people who are in the "genius" category without realizing that they are in that club because they won national titles.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry Boers isn't exactly a go-to for baskteball knowledge.


But Brick is? And the larger point is this. John Thompson was never hit with the "genius" label. Nor has any other black coach in the history of college basketball been tabbed with the label.

John Thompson is in the Hall Of Fame as you used as evidence. Thompson is undoubtedly considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. He won national coach of the year in two different seasons.


Yeah and never considered a genius coach either. Neither was Ray Meyer. Also in the Hall of Fame. And I doubt that Ed Cooley gets there either.
Jay Wright is another that is considered a genius coach too. Billy Donovan was also considered a genius when he coached at the college level. Hell the willingness of MANY to still accept him at the pro level is based solely off of what he did in college
John Thompson is considered one of the great coaches in NCAA history. I think it's just your perception that he wasn't considered as smart as others.

You keep on mentioning coaches who won national titles as people who are in the "genius" category without realizing that they are in that club because they won national titles.


I also gave you an example of how the "genius" label translated into top jobs for MANY of their assistants. You can claim that "none of this matters" or you aren't "sure" what I mean, but the people that did the hiring and their legions of fans sure as hell know what I'm talking about.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
I also gave you an example of how the "genius" label translated into top jobs for MANY of their assistants.
I missed it. Who was the coach?

The Missing Link wrote:
ou can claim that "none of this matters" or you aren't "sure" what I mean, but the people that did the hiring and their legions of fans sure as hell know what I'm talking about.
That's a different discussion. Clearly, it was harder for non-white coaches to get head coaching jobs. There is still some of that.

That doesn't mean that John Thompson isn't considered one of the greatest coaches of all time and the fact that you are naming all of these other coaches that were called "genius" that also have national titles and the best coach ever to not win a national title doesn't change that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
Nolan Richardson?

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Just some help: https://www.papertrell.com/apps/preview ... fault.html

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
That's a different discussion. Clearly, it was harder for non-white coaches to get head coaching jobs. There is still some of that.

That doesn't mean that John Thompson isn't considered one of the greatest coaches of all time and the fact that you are naming all of these other coaches that were called "genius" that also have national titles and the best coach ever to not win a national title doesn't change that.

John Thompson was never given the genius label. He was lauded mostly for being mentor to young black men. Most people believe the only reason he has a national championship is because he happened to coach one of the most dominant bigs that college basketball has ever seen. He also is considered chiefly responsible for losing in both the single biggest upset in college basketball history and the biggest upset in Olympic history.
But let's stay with Ed Cooley for a second.
If Ed Cooley is held in such high regard, then why have the Assistants of Coach K typically been afforded better jobs than the one that he just took? Just Asking A Question

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
Harvard Dan wrote:
Nolan Richardson?

:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
John Thompson was never given the genius label. He was lauded mostly for being mentor to young black men. Most people believe the only reason he has a national championship is because he happened to coach one of the most dominant bigs that college basketball has ever seen. He also is considered chiefly responsible for losing in both the single biggest upset in college basketball history and the biggest upset in Olympic history.
Are you now arguing that John Thompson isn't actually a genius? :lol:



The Missing Link wrote:
But let's stay with Ed Cooley for a second.
If Ed Cooley is held in such high regard, then why have the Assistants of Coach K typically been afforded better jobs than the one that he just took? Just Asking A Question
Well, Coach K is arguably the greatest college basketball coach of all time and is no worse than top 5.

I however don't think you are correct that Coach K's assistants have gotten better jobs than Georgetown. Of course Scheyer did as he got to follow Coach K at Duke but that doesn't really count because someone had to get that job. Michigan is a better job than Georgetown. Notre Dame is basically the same job. Marquette is basically the same job too. Missouri isn't as good of a job as Georgetown. Georgetown is a far better job than Northwestern. Now, Ewing was a disaster at Georgetown but the job isn't as bad as Ewing performed.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
Are you now arguing that John Thompson isn't actually a genius? :lol: .
Typical Brick move by the way. What I just demonstrated were reasons that MANY never associated him with being a genius. Which kills your argument.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:


Isn't Shaka something like 2-7 in his last 7 trips to the dance?

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
I however don't think you are correct that Coach K's assistants have gotten better jobs than Georgetown.

Yet you just rolled off about 4 or 5 that are obviously better than Georgetown.
Brick wrote:
Of course Scheyer did as he got to follow Coach K at Duke but that doesn't really count because someone had to get that job. Michigan is a better job than Georgetown. Notre Dame is basically the same job. Marquette is basically the same job too. Missouri isn't as good of a job as Georgetown. Georgetown is a far better job than Northwestern. Now, Ewing was a disaster at Georgetown but the job isn't as bad as Ewing performed.

Every job on that list is a better job than Georgetown save for maybe Northwestern. And you left off Stanford and several other schools in which Coach K's assistants have taken jobs. And again if Ed Cooley is the dude then why did he HAVE to take a worse job than the ones afforded to Coach K assistants?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:43 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
RFDC wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Nolan Richardson?

:lol:

Not sure what is funny but he was a great coach.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
Are you now arguing that John Thompson isn't actually a genius? :lol: .
Typical Brick move by the way. What I just demonstrated were reasons that MANY never associated him with being a genius. Which kills your argument.
Do you even think Thompson was a "genius"?

I think he is one of the great coaches of all time in college basketball. If Bill Self is a genius then so is Thompson.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
John Thompson was never given the genius label. He was lauded mostly for being mentor to young black men. Most people believe the only reason he has a national championship is because he happened to coach one of the most dominant bigs that college basketball has ever seen. He also is considered chiefly responsible for losing in both the single biggest upset in college basketball history and the biggest upset in Olympic history.
Are you now arguing that John Thompson isn't actually a genius? :lol:


I'm going to say that LTG (apologies for assuming) is coming from the angle that just because Thompson was great he wasn't considered a genius...similar on how Clark is seen as "gritty/competitor" while Reese is a "thug/unsportsmanlike".

As an aside it was interesting to see Reese tweeting she'd love to be invited to visit the Michelle Obama after Dr. Jill Biden Ed.d floated the idea of also inviting Iowa to the White House since they played so well.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Last edited by Harvard Dan on Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
Hawg Ass wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Nolan Richardson?

:lol:

Not sure what is funny but he was a great coach.

Really good coach.

not a genius.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
I however don't think you are correct that Coach K's assistants have gotten better jobs than Georgetown.

Yet you just rolled off about 4 or 5 that are obviously better than Georgetown.
Brick wrote:
Of course Scheyer did as he got to follow Coach K at Duke but that doesn't really count because someone had to get that job. Michigan is a better job than Georgetown. Notre Dame is basically the same job. Marquette is basically the same job too. Missouri isn't as good of a job as Georgetown. Georgetown is a far better job than Northwestern. Now, Ewing was a disaster at Georgetown but the job isn't as bad as Ewing performed.

Every job on that list is a better job than Georgetown save for maybe Northwestern. And you left off Stanford and several other schools in which Coach K's assistants have taken jobs. And again if Ed Cooley is the dude then why did he HAVE to take a worse job than the ones afforded to Coach K assistants?

If you can't even acknowledge that Georgetown is a far better job than Northwestern then I'm starting to believe you have no clue about college basketball. :lol:

Once again, Coach K is easily one of the top 5 coaches of all time. His assistants, especially when he was winning national titles, are going to get good jobs. Most of them were comparable to Georgetown.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Harvard Dan wrote:
I'm going to say that LTG (and I'm sorry to speak for you) is coming from the angle that just because Thompson was great he wasn't considered a genius...similar on how Clark is seen as "gritty/competitor" while Reese is a "thug/unsportsmanlike".

Might be but it would be more than just perception because the guys that learned under the "genius" coaches also tended to get top jobs too. Thus there is an easily discernible financial component associated with it too. Other than Thompson’s son, which guys sprayed from his "coaching tree" and ever took.a top job anywhere? And even his son had to slum it first by coaching at Princeton.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
If you can't even acknowledge that Georgetown is a far better job than Northwestern then I'm starting to believe you have no clue about college basketball. :lol:

Once again, Coach K is easily one of the top 5 coaches of all time. His assistants, especially when he was winning national titles, are going to get good jobs. Most of them were comparable to Georgetown.


And if you don't think Missouri is a better job than Georgetown then you have no clue about College basketball either. That isn't even a conversation.

But it's just not Coach K's Assistants. Pitino's Assistants also have stepped into top jobs over the years too and you thought it stupid to have him on the "genius" list. So have Izzos.

And don't you realize that you aren't really making any sense? You have now been reduced to trying to provide a rationale as to why guys with absolutely no coaching experience or record of success as head coaches are consistently provided with better jobs than the dude you yourself claim is thought of as a genius. Do you not "understand" that this is "counterintuitive"?

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
And if you don't think Missouri is a better job than Georgetown then you have no clue about College basketball either. That isn't even a conversation.
Missouri basketball has NEVER been to a Final Four. They've been to the Sweet Sixteen 6 times in history. Georgetown has been to the Final Four 5 times, and the Sweet Sixteen 11 times. You seem to think that Georgetown basketball is defined by how bad Patrick Ewing was.


The Missing Link wrote:
And don't you realize that you aren't really making any sense? You have now been reduced to trying to provide a rationale as to why guys with absolutely no coaching experience or record of success as head coaches are consistently provided with better jobs than the dude you yourself claim is thought of as a genius. Do you not realize that this is "counterintuitive"?
This is wrong. You are flat out wrong about Georgetown basketball. I mean, you won't even acknowledge that a school that has 5 Final Four appearances isn't a much better job than one that has 2 NCAA tournament appearances.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I'm seeing many of LTG's point but gotta agree with Brick on Georgetown - pretty prestigious. That said, that a minority is HC at G-town doesn't necessarily undermine LTG's argument.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Hawg Ass wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Nolan Richardson?

:lol:

Not sure what is funny but he was a great coach.


The aforementioned Nolan Richardson. Very interesting and poignant comments by the way.

https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaab-th ... rshly.html

Quote:
"Black coaches, we're judged as a group and judged more harshly," Richardson explained. "White coaches are judged individually and usually more leniently."

Then he cited often overlooked black coaching pioneers like John McLendon and Clarence Gaines.

"No matter how well they did, the white power structure in college basketball mostly ignored them," Richardson said. "If McLendon had been white, he'd have been a star in the coaching world. If all the great coaches in basketball history like (Bob) Knight or (John) Wooden had been black, they'd be nobodies."

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
The Missing Link wrote:
And if you don't think Missouri is a better job than Georgetown then you have no clue about College basketball either. That isn't even a conversation.

Brick wrote:
Missouri basketball has NEVER been to a Final Four. They've been to the Sweet Sixteen 6 times in history. Georgetown has been to the Final Four 5 times, and the Sweet Sixteen 11 times. You seem to think that Georgetown basketball is defined by how bad Patrick Ewing was.



The Missing Link wrote:
And don't you realize that you aren't really making any sense? You have now been reduced to trying to provide a rationale as to why guys with absolutely no coaching experience or record of success as head coaches are consistently provided with better jobs than the dude you yourself claim is thought of as a genius. Do you not realize that this is "counterintuitive"?

Brick wrote:
This is wrong. You are flat out wrong about Georgetown basketball. I mean, you won't even acknowledge that a school that has 5 Final Four appearances isn't a much better job than one that has 2 NCAA tournament appearances.


Georgetown was irrelevant long before Pat Ewing was coach that is why they made Pat Ewing the Coach. And if Final Four appearances is such the measuring stick of a program's success, then why the non stop bashing of the Illini? They have just as many appearances as Georgetown.

Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, I'm saying 2005 was 12 years ago. We're getting to the point where Illinois hasn't been a respectable program since potential recruits have been watching and playing basketball. That matters a hell of a lot more than being a decent program in the 1980's does if we are ranking programs.
2005.

Also, I agree with about half your list.

MSU, Villanova, Louisville, and Arizona for sure are better than Illinois. UConn would be but they are absolutely screwed with the conference situation.

Illinois, just like my own team, doesn't have near enough national success to compare. That doesn't mean they can't get there but potential doesn't mean much.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
Brick wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
If I were to tell you I already named two of them in this thread, well before the question was asked, you'd deny it, so what can I do?
Say it's your opinion. However it's obvious that the gritty label is reserved for "certain" types of players. And "heady" as well.

And when it comes to coaches forget it. You never hear of black coaches being "great strategists".

Ed Cooley is considered one of the best in all of college basketball right now.


Ed Cooley has never made the Final Four. Sort of tough to be bestowed with the "Genius" level with this being the case.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Caitlin Clark
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
The Missing Link wrote:
Georgetown was irrelevant long before Pat Ewing was coach that is why they made Pat Ewing the Coach. And if Final Four appearances is such the measuring stick of a program's success, then why the non stop bashing of the Illini? They have just as many appearances as Georgetown.
Final Fours are important. Are you arguing otherwise? In regards to Missouri, it isn't close. In regards to Northwestern, it isn't even a discussion. Georgetown and Northwestern being comparable in college basketball is an all time bad thought.

I also wasn't bashing the Illini in the quote below unless you also think I'm bashing Purdue.
The Missing Link wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No, I'm saying 2005 was 12 years ago. We're getting to the point where Illinois hasn't been a respectable program since potential recruits have been watching and playing basketball. That matters a hell of a lot more than being a decent program in the 1980's does if we are ranking programs.
2005.

Also, I agree with about half your list.

MSU, Villanova, Louisville, and Arizona for sure are better than Illinois. UConn would be but they are absolutely screwed with the conference situation.

Illinois, just like my own team, doesn't have near enough national success to compare. That doesn't mean they can't get there but potential doesn't mean much.

I don't think this quote really helps your point. MSU, Villanova, Louisville, and Arizona are also better jobs than Georgetown. UConn is too.

Georgetown does have the national title banner and Illinois doesn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 570 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group