Frank Coztansa wrote:
You didn't provide context to anyone you condescending ignoramus. For the second time now, let me refresh your memory:
Tall Midget wrote:
"Claypool is getting into it with different defensive players every day....I am concerned about his relationship with his teammates off the field."--Herb Howard, 8/11/23, on Bernstein/Holmes
I'm not sure how much more I can dumb this down for you as this is your very own post.
You seem to think it's important that all the players get along. If you don't feel this way, then why would you make that post in the first place? Having been through the Marc Trestman building of men years, that shit is almost meaningless.
Ill leave this debate with another one of your posts:
Tall Midget wrote:
There is a difference between being competitive and being a douche.
You aren't being competitive here so surely such a brilliant and seasoned mind as yours can figure out what you are.
As I have pointed out, Claypool hasn't simply been failing to get along with teammates; he has actively been fomenting dissension among teammates. If you can't understand the difference, you are precisely the dolt I have described you as being.
More importantly, it is noteworthy that you continue to dodge my question about why you are consistently, even obsessively, commenting on a topic that is of no interest to you. Since you are evidently incapable of explaining your behavior in this regard, let me provide an explanation for you:
In typical Flapjacks fashion, you initially commented on my post only to figuratively crap on it, to demonstrate how you are "above it all" by dismissing Howard's quote without bothering to engage with it. This dismissal, of course, was fueled--again, in typical Flapjacks fashion--by your own admitted ignorance of the topic under discussion. When I pointed out the logical contradiction lying at the heart of your participation in this thread, you chose to dig in your heels, shift the rhetorical target, further contradict yourself, and continue arguing because your ego had been bruised. Your temper became further inflamed because I treated you with the same degree of condescension that characterizes many of your posts. This dynamic, it should be noted, is present in much of your behavior here, a circumstance that explains (in part) why you have long-running/ongoing feuds with so many posters here, including (but not limited to) JORR, LTG, Seacrest, Caller Bob, WFR, and now me. That's quite a broad range of posters to be at odds with, but the quantity and variety of personalities involved is suggestive of the immense personal insecurity shaping your on-screen persona. You post-stalk, berate, belittle and incessantly argue not because you have a substantive point to make in debating a broad spectrum of posters --as you revealingly conceded in our fracas--but because this board serves as an important (and perhaps the only) source of self-esteem for you. You can't stop posting because that would mean you'd have to stop propping yourself up, and your desperate, delicate ego simply won't allow that to happen. You are most assuredly a sad little man.
_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
