Boy you ain't kidding. You know they wanted to get rid of her. Probably realized they dodged a bullet too cause they knew she'd sue them eventually.
In other words, she sucks.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

They have quite a bit of evidence supporting them not promoting her to that position permanently. Just look through every piece she has written that is factually incorrect, incoherent, misspelled and lacking a shred of grammatical integrity.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!

Unless she's playing the long con and is going to allege that because she has self-diagnosed ADD and ADHD, it was a violation of anti-discrimination laws for Deadspin not to hire her as EiC because she routinely published articles and headlines that she had not thoroughly proof-read, fact-checked, etc.

Can someone share a copy of the conplaint?

Im writing in Julie DeCairo for president 2024 MAKE AMERICA FOREIGN AGAIN

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

i like hilton garden inns. the corporate ones are usually outdated. the big one in milwaukee sucks ass, but their garden inn on the east side of the river is really nice.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.

A deadspin EIC makes 160k? Wild

This might be a problem for her.

_________________

So she worked in the interim position for six months (Dec 2022 - June 2023) without getting the promised raise? Item 13 should be easy to prove/disprove. “Through DiCaro’s union representative, G/O had indicated that it would pay DiCaro the difference between her salary and $160,000 for the period that she held the acting EIC position.”

(Shouldn’t the complaint have more accurately said ‘G/O indicated it would pay DiCaro a salary of $160,000 for the period that she held the acting EIC position’? Maybe G/O really meant they would literally just pay her the difference. Seems sloppy, just like Julie’s editing.)

Can’t wait to see G/O’s response. Should be a fun lawsuit to follow.

_________________

This lawsuit probably is a lead indicator that deadspin is about to go under. When she felt the heat on her at 670 she claimed some crazy bullshit like the guys were watching porn on their computers at work, probably trying to set up a lawsuit but I bet it's easy enough to prove it didn't happen.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

Not to mention the good morning kiss. I laugh every time I think of it.

My guess is she never complained that her pay didn’t increase as allegedly promised (how would her beloved union not have fought that for six months?) because she saw an opportunity for an eventual lawsuit. The lawsuit would benefit her professional victim career more than the pay bump.

_________________

BR and his twitter accounts have the proof that statement is false

Laid off from 670 and has bad mouthed them ever since, has intimated harassment and discrimination there , now she sues her current employer over “ discrimination “ . I don’t know how much she’s suing for and how much she would get if successful but this will be the last job she ever has because no one in the right mind would ever hire her after this track record.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Her training now is complete. She can go to congress.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

She is still a current employee? I've never heard of suing your current employee, moreso after you have separated.

$160K for a website that's a laughing stock?

The problem is that they was dumb enough to hire her so it's completely PLAUSIBLE they fucked up with her employment somewhere. Their lack of REALLY SMART PEOPLE will be their undoing.

Just because you're performing a different role doesn't mean you should expect the company to pay you that. You often have to perform at the next level before you get merit to reflect that. Did she expect to be paid at a higher level because she was filling in or did the company actually commit to that as she accuses? I've never heard of that in my career (what she's accusing them). And....$160K for an editor of a failing site.

This is our most common suit (employment practices) in my line of coverage. People sue all the time while still working at the company. Usually it is sexual harassment that causes a suit like this while still working for the company. But failure to promote is another type.

If she can show they agreed to pay her more, then back pay should be awarded. I doubt the discrimination claim has legs. Those are tough to prove without a gotcha email. If they had the gotcha, then the EEOC would have jumped on board.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

So assuming she was getting paid for those six months, she’s entitled to the difference between what she was paid and the $160k?

So if she was making $100k, the difference between the $160k and $100k would be about $30k for those six months. After lawyer fees, hardly seems worth the effort.

Unless the real play is more victimhood for her brand or even another book.

Then it was her union's job to follow through and make sure that she got paid initially.

_________________

I’ll bet it has cankles though.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Yeah it seems like a union grievance should have been filed. I suspect it was not because the company never agreed to pay her that. But an employee should get additional pay for extra duties. Not sure how it works elsewhere, but both places I have worked have job grades. Those categories relate to the required duties. So doing your bosses’ job is a higher grade. And each grade has a pay range.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

Lol.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You

Did she write that? There is a spelling mistake on the first page. Jezabel

_________________

[quote="denisdman"][quote="BD"][quote="badrogue17"]Laid off from 670 and has bad mouthed them ever since, has intimated harassment and discrimination there , now she sues her current employer over “ discrimination “ . I don’t know how much she’s suing for and how much she would get if successful but this will be the last job she ever has because no one in the right mind would ever hire her after this track record.[/quote]

She is still a current employee? I've never heard of suing your current employee, moreso after you have separated.[/quote]

This is our most common suit (employment practices) in my line of coverage. People sue all the time while still working at the company. Usually it is sexual harassment that causes a suit like this while still working for the company. But failure to promote is another type.

If she can show they agreed to pay her more, then back pay should be awarded. I doubt the discrimination claim has legs. Those are tough to prove without a gotcha email. If they had the gotcha, then the EEOC would have jumped on board.[/quote]

Good points here. Sexual harassment or work place harassment is a common lawsuit. I have not heard of suing for a position that she thinks she has earned without out an email stating that.

Remember when she said everybody at the SCORE was watching porn?

That was obviously a lie, cuz she sure as hell would have won that law suit.

This actual law suit is a lie too. I'm sure she's lying about the boss saying she would get paid that salary as a "temp". And if it's not in writing, she's not gonna win the law suit.

Isn't much of her writing prima facie evidence of why she did not merit that promotion? i.e. "...clamboring..."?

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."