It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:52 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 78  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Haugh argued that at this point, "doing right by Justin" means just releasing him and letting him sign somewhere. Waiting/hoping for some kind of haul is going to hurt him, and both he and Williams cannot co-exist in the same locker room.

Let's not act like Fields was a war hero. The Bears should salvage some of what they invested in him.

He has been professional and loyal to the Bears. Treating him badly won't go unnoticed by the rest of the league.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Keep him and wait for a week 1 or 2 injury then.

They've already promised to be fair to Fields. Making him sit on the bench through Preseason and an unknown number of games is a bad look. It also doesn't guarantee a better pick, and a 3rd the next year is worse than a 3rd this one.

I think they'd take a 3rd pick with the chance to have it upgrade to a 2nd.

If you are right and no team wants Fields then why wouldn't it be fair to Fields to wait and send him to a place he would start for a team trying to make the playoffs.

If he is replacing a quality guy injured early in the season then it's also likely that guy will come back and Fields will go to the bench. It also means Fields isn't the day 1 starter with the benefit of preseason which would help him learn the system and ultimately make a case for a big contract extension on a team that presumably wants him and feels like he is a fit rather than an emergency replacement.

But again the point is that no one wants him now. That's your argument. Sending him to a place for a 6th round pick to be a backup isn't great for him or the Bears.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Keep him and wait for a week 1 or 2 injury then.

They've already promised to be fair to Fields. Making him sit on the bench through Preseason and an unknown number of games is a bad look. It also doesn't guarantee a better pick, and a 3rd the next year is worse than a 3rd this one.

I think they'd take a 3rd pick with the chance to have it upgrade to a 2nd.

If you are right and no team wants Fields then why wouldn't it be fair to Fields to wait and send him to a place he would start for a team trying to make the playoffs.

If he is replacing a quality guy injured early in the season then it's also likely that guy will come back and Fields will go to the bench. It also means Fields isn't the day 1 starter with the benefit of preseason which would help him learn the system and ultimately make a case for a big contract extension on a team that presumably wants him and feels like he is a fit rather than an emergency replacement.

But again the point is that no one wants him now. That's your argument. Sending him to a place for a 6th round pick to be a backup isn't great for him or the Bears.

That's not what I said at all. I said he could bring a 3rd rd pick - which is still valuable.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Haugh argued that at this point, "doing right by Justin" means just releasing him and letting him sign somewhere. Waiting/hoping for some kind of haul is going to hurt him, and both he and Williams cannot co-exist in the same locker room.

Let's not act like Fields was a war hero. The Bears should salvage some of what they invested in him.

He has been professional and loyal to the Bears. Treating him badly won't go unnoticed by the rest of the league.

Then he can be professional for another few games with the Bears.

Again, if no one wants him now then just keep him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Keep him and wait for a week 1 or 2 injury then.

They've already promised to be fair to Fields. Making him sit on the bench through Preseason and an unknown number of games is a bad look. It also doesn't guarantee a better pick, and a 3rd the next year is worse than a 3rd this one.

I think they'd take a 3rd pick with the chance to have it upgrade to a 2nd.

If you are right and no team wants Fields then why wouldn't it be fair to Fields to wait and send him to a place he would start for a team trying to make the playoffs.

If he is replacing a quality guy injured early in the season then it's also likely that guy will come back and Fields will go to the bench. It also means Fields isn't the day 1 starter with the benefit of preseason which would help him learn the system and ultimately make a case for a big contract extension on a team that presumably wants him and feels like he is a fit rather than an emergency replacement.

But again the point is that no one wants him now. That's your argument. Sending him to a place for a 6th round pick to be a backup isn't great for him or the Bears.

That's not what I said at all. I said he could bring a 3rd rd pick - which is still valuable.

You just had a post saying the Bucs are the only team that would have interest.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:50 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23875
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Fields is simultaneously suggested to be both extremely professional and also unable to coexist in a locker room with his replacement.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Haugh argued that at this point, "doing right by Justin" means just releasing him and letting him sign somewhere. Waiting/hoping for some kind of haul is going to hurt him, and both he and Williams cannot co-exist in the same locker room.

Let's not act like Fields was a war hero. The Bears should salvage some of what they invested in him.

He has been professional and loyal to the Bears. Treating him badly won't go unnoticed by the rest of the league.

Then he can be professional for another few games with the Bears.

Again, if no one wants him now then just keep him.


It'd be mismanagement if you keep him and Williams after all the drama. Part of being an executive is reading the room - having both around can lead to a toxic work environment. Having a clean start with Williams is worth more than keeping Fields around until someone coughs up a fourth for him during week 3.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Fields is simultaneously suggested to be both extremely professional and also unable to coexist in a locker room with his replacement.


It's not necessarily him. It's DJ Moore and all the others who insulted Caleb, Drake, etc while backing their guy.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
They've already promised to be fair to Fields. Making him sit on the bench through Preseason and an unknown number of games is a bad look. It also doesn't guarantee a better pick, and a 3rd the next year is worse than a 3rd this one.

I think they'd take a 3rd pick with the chance to have it upgrade to a 2nd.

If you are right and no team wants Fields then why wouldn't it be fair to Fields to wait and send him to a place he would start for a team trying to make the playoffs.

If he is replacing a quality guy injured early in the season then it's also likely that guy will come back and Fields will go to the bench. It also means Fields isn't the day 1 starter with the benefit of preseason which would help him learn the system and ultimately make a case for a big contract extension on a team that presumably wants him and feels like he is a fit rather than an emergency replacement.

But again the point is that no one wants him now. That's your argument. Sending him to a place for a 6th round pick to be a backup isn't great for him or the Bears.

That's not what I said at all. I said he could bring a 3rd rd pick - which is still valuable.

You just had a post saying the Bucs are the only team that would have interest.

I simply am saying I don't think there will be a bidding war. I think they'll get a 3rd for him and that's fine.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
NFL combine's biggest loser: Chicago Bears' trade market for Justin Fields

Bo Nix placed his passes with precision. Michael Penix Jr. threw with power. J.J. McCarthy was mobile, accurate and strong.
Yes, it was just a Saturday afternoon at the NFL scouting combine, college stars throwing against air. Yet with each impressive performance you could practically see the draft position of each quarterback solidified — first-rounders — just as the corresponding trade market for Chicago’s Justin Fields softened. Chicago could still get something for Fields, just perhaps not what it was hoping for a few weeks ago. The combine turned a draft that was top heavy with QBs — Williams, Maye and Daniels — into one that is also deep with QBs — McCarthy, Penix and Nix.

Previously, a team such as Atlanta, with the eighth overall draft pick, may have felt the need to grab Fields in the hope that the Falcons can maximize his talents in a way the Bears haven’t. Now, at least if the Falcons hold the consensus opinion of scouts following the combine, they may believe they have viable options through the draft, namely McCarthy. In other words, rather than give up trade assets to get Fields, who would require a $25 million payout in 2025 and an even heftier extension beyond that, the Falcons could take McCarthy without giving up picks and have him on a cheaper rookie contract. If that's the route Atlanta takes, that’s one prime suitor off the market for Chicago.

Penix must still make it through medical exams and concerns from an injury-plagued college career at Washington and Indiana, but his performance at the combine mimicked his huge season in leading the Huskies to the national championship game. To many, he had the best throwing performance of the group. He looks pro ready.
If his knee checks out, he’s a likely first-round pick — offering another cheaper option than trying to deal for Fields.

It’s the same with Nix. His arm may lack the pop of the elite draft prospects but his accuracy Saturday showed that his FBS-record 77.45 percent completion percentage last season wasn't merely the product of the Oregon offensive system. His footwork was also vastly improved and no one is questioning his football acumen or leadership.
If he can keep it up throughout the draft process, it is not out of the question that six quarterbacks are taken in the first round — or twice as many as some big boards predicted just a few weeks ago.

Is Fields worth a second-round pick? A third? Some combination of third day selections? The better this crop of incoming quarterbacks looks, the smaller the market for Fields and thus the less he is likely to fetch. Individual pro days and private workouts are the next data points that could determine things. The Bears are still in a nice spot headed into this draft, perhaps not as nice as they once hoped.


source: the green and gold report


source: Dan Wetzel·Columnist
https://us.yahoo.com/sports/nfl-combines-biggest-loser-chicago-bears-trade-market-for-justin-fields-190007296.html


brilliant analysis

if and if and if equals definite

thanks for your concern

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91931
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I simply am saying I don't think there will be a bidding war. I think they'll get a 3rd for him and that's fine.

Yeah and if they can't get a 3rd then keep him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
good dolphin wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
NFL combine's biggest loser: Chicago Bears' trade market for Justin Fields

Bo Nix placed his passes with precision. Michael Penix Jr. threw with power. J.J. McCarthy was mobile, accurate and strong.
Yes, it was just a Saturday afternoon at the NFL scouting combine, college stars throwing against air. Yet with each impressive performance you could practically see the draft position of each quarterback solidified — first-rounders — just as the corresponding trade market for Chicago’s Justin Fields softened. Chicago could still get something for Fields, just perhaps not what it was hoping for a few weeks ago. The combine turned a draft that was top heavy with QBs — Williams, Maye and Daniels — into one that is also deep with QBs — McCarthy, Penix and Nix.

Previously, a team such as Atlanta, with the eighth overall draft pick, may have felt the need to grab Fields in the hope that the Falcons can maximize his talents in a way the Bears haven’t. Now, at least if the Falcons hold the consensus opinion of scouts following the combine, they may believe they have viable options through the draft, namely McCarthy. In other words, rather than give up trade assets to get Fields, who would require a $25 million payout in 2025 and an even heftier extension beyond that, the Falcons could take McCarthy without giving up picks and have him on a cheaper rookie contract. If that's the route Atlanta takes, that’s one prime suitor off the market for Chicago.

Penix must still make it through medical exams and concerns from an injury-plagued college career at Washington and Indiana, but his performance at the combine mimicked his huge season in leading the Huskies to the national championship game. To many, he had the best throwing performance of the group. He looks pro ready.
If his knee checks out, he’s a likely first-round pick — offering another cheaper option than trying to deal for Fields.

It’s the same with Nix. His arm may lack the pop of the elite draft prospects but his accuracy Saturday showed that his FBS-record 77.45 percent completion percentage last season wasn't merely the product of the Oregon offensive system. His footwork was also vastly improved and no one is questioning his football acumen or leadership.
If he can keep it up throughout the draft process, it is not out of the question that six quarterbacks are taken in the first round — or twice as many as some big boards predicted just a few weeks ago.

Is Fields worth a second-round pick? A third? Some combination of third day selections? The better this crop of incoming quarterbacks looks, the smaller the market for Fields and thus the less he is likely to fetch. Individual pro days and private workouts are the next data points that could determine things. The Bears are still in a nice spot headed into this draft, perhaps not as nice as they once hoped.


source: the green and gold report


source: Dan Wetzel·Columnist
https://us.yahoo.com/sports/nfl-combines-biggest-loser-chicago-bears-trade-market-for-justin-fields-190007296.html


brilliant analysis

if and if and if equals definite

thanks for your concern
First time reading a sports article?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terrible thought. The same people who lied about Caleb are reporting stuff put out there by teams who are looking to get a great deal on Fields. The market will be clear soon. Zero reason to panic.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13239
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
Terrible thought. The same people who lied about Caleb are reporting stuff put out there by teams who are looking to get a great deal on Fields. The market will be clear soon. Zero reason to panic.

Image

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65733
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
The Hawk wrote:
Nas wrote:
BD wrote:
NME wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
If you think Maye gets past Cards why not trade back with Washington or New England and pick up extra picks?

You would get Maye, Nabers or Odunze, maybe pick up a second this year where you pick your center, or a different WR from what is supposedly a deep WR class?




If the Bears are going QB with that 1st pick.. I think it’s getting riskier to move back (even AZ might consider a QB up this high and maybe trade Call of Duty). Atm I think you take your guy and don’t look back. After all, if you finally nail that pick your franchise’s future is set for the next decade.


At most, if the Bears like both Maye and Williams, right now they trade back the one spot and take the one that falls to them. But atm I don’t think the smart move is to go back even a couple of slots if QB is indeed their top priority.


The Bears aren't going to be indifferent between Maye and Williams. If they move on from Fields, they are going to get the one they want, not settle for who is left. It's even more important to take the one that is supposedly a difference maker. Maybe both become a difference maker, but the Bears have to hit on this else Poles will probably get fired a year from now.


I think the chance of Poles losing his job, after one more year, is near zero.


If he trades fields and signs Williams he will be gone this year.

No offense intended but that's just ridiculous. I don't understand how anyone can know football and think that Fields is a top 25 NFL quarterback.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
League GMs, player personnel officials, scouts, etc. are saying no thanks to Fields. The cult however thinks Fields is better than Mahomes. Great to see reality set in for the cult - I'm sure they had fun while the mirage lasted.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
Nas wrote:
Terrible thought. The same people who lied about Caleb are reporting stuff put out there by teams who are looking to get a great deal on Fields. The market will be clear soon. Zero reason to panic.


Yep. Sit back and let the market come to you.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:37 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12443
Brick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Haugh argued that at this point, "doing right by Justin" means just releasing him and letting him sign somewhere. Waiting/hoping for some kind of haul is going to hurt him, and both he and Williams cannot co-exist in the same locker room.

Let's not act like Fields was a war hero. The Bears should salvage some of what they invested in him.


This has taken some major turns.

Just a few weeks ago, there was some national speculation (from Kiper) that the Bears could get the #8 pick for Fields. Even after some pushback on that, #20 was seen as not crazy.

Then it sort of morphed back to the original though of a 2nd and 4th.

Then it became the free agent market must shake out first and now Cousins is likely to go to Atlanta where several media people were having informed conversations about the likelihood of that happening because Fields is from the area.

Now it's the demand for Fields is not there, he may not get a landing spot from one of the obvious choices....

Does anyone know what's going on? Probably not.

(although Laurence Holmes did tell us last week that he was being told a Fields trade to Atlanta was imminent, meaning during the draft combine, based on people in the know)....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
The Bills are still 40+ million over the cap (worst cap situation in football). Not the best poker face, Ryan...




Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:43 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12443
Caller Bob wrote:
The Bills are still 40+ million over the cap (worst cap situation in football). Not the best poker face, Ryan...




I don't mind them trading for Bates, but I do question why they had to give up anything with their cap issues. Maybe other teams were interested?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Could have signed a similar guy for money without giving up a pick.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Could have signed a similar guy for money without giving up a pick.


It's a 5th round pick. Who cares? He didn't have to risk the guy being traded to another team for a 6th or signing somewhere else as a free agent. Bates was a guy that he targeted.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Caller Bob wrote:
The Bills are still 40+ million over the cap (worst cap situation in football). Not the best poker face, Ryan...




Additionally, the Bears very likely could have signed him a couple years ago if they had front-loaded the contract. That would have been fine for the Bears' cap situation, but it would have created a mess for the Bills.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
The Bills are still 40+ million over the cap (worst cap situation in football). Not the best poker face, Ryan...




Additionally, the Bears very likely could have signed him a couple years ago if they had front-loaded the contract. That would have been fine for the Bears' cap situation, but it would have created a mess for the Bills.


Yeah, this was the real problem. They didn't structure the contract in a way that the Bills couldn't match.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:11 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23875
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Could have signed a similar guy for money without giving up a pick.


It's a 5th round pick. Who cares? He didn't have to risk the guy being traded to another team for a 6th or signing somewhere else as a free agent. Bates was a guy that he targeted.

Those are depth picks. Jones came from the 5th round.

There’s a little bit of a pattern forming that suggests Poles will prioritize FA signings & trades over the draft.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Last edited by This Ends in Antioch on Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Could have signed a similar guy for money without giving up a pick.


It's a 5th round pick. Who cares? He didn't have to risk the guy being traded to another team for a 6th or signing somewhere else as a free agent. Bates was a guy that he targeted.


Puka Nacua was a 5th rounder. Bates is not some diamond in the rough OL. He's a generic swing dude you can find in FA or develop. Poles is compounding the mistake he made when he failed to structure Bates offer the right way. He needs to calm down and stop turning into Ryan Pace/Josh Lucas with the trading picks thing.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
I read somewhere the plan is that he is going to play center. That sounds like a similar plan to last year and the year before.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
BD wrote:
Brick wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Haugh argued that at this point, "doing right by Justin" means just releasing him and letting him sign somewhere. Waiting/hoping for some kind of haul is going to hurt him, and both he and Williams cannot co-exist in the same locker room.

Let's not act like Fields was a war hero. The Bears should salvage some of what they invested in him.


This has taken some major turns.

Just a few weeks ago, there was some national speculation (from Kiper) that the Bears could get the #8 pick for Fields. Even after some pushback on that, #20 was seen as not crazy.

Then it sort of morphed back to the original though of a 2nd and 4th.

Then it became the free agent market must shake out first and now Cousins is likely to go to Atlanta where several media people were having informed conversations about the likelihood of that happening because Fields is from the area.

Now it's the demand for Fields is not there, he may not get a landing spot from one of the obvious choices....

Does anyone know what's going on? Probably not.

(although Laurence Holmes did tell us last week that he was being told a Fields trade to Atlanta was imminent, meaning during the draft combine, based on people in the know)....


It's the lying season. Reporters are useful idiots for the teams and not to be believed.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
I read somewhere the plan is that he is going to play center. That sounds like a similar plan to last year and the year before.


I thought he was a hedge in case they struck out in free agency and the draft.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 12:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Could have signed a similar guy for money without giving up a pick.


It's a 5th round pick. Who cares? He didn't have to risk the guy being traded to another team for a 6th or signing somewhere else as a free agent. Bates was a guy that he targeted.

Those are depth picks. Jones came from the 5th round.

There’s a little bit of a pattern forming that suggests Poles will prioritize FA signings & trades over the draft.


He turns middle round picks into a shitload of late round picks every year. I doubt that will change, even before our Fields return.

How? He fielded a team with damn near nothing but his draft picks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2334 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 78  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group