It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 7:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 372 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 8:47 pm 
Online
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.


Of course. Only the views of the people who didn't have an issue with the speech are valid.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.


Of course. Only the views of the people who didn't have an issue with the speech are valid.

They’re all valid.

Validity is a spectrum.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55774
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I guess when you think about it, "capitalism is evil and also women should participate in it to the exclusion of having a loving family" is a weird position, but I'm still trying to crack the code on "transgenders for Palestine," and I kinda have to take these one at a time.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9901
pizza_Place: world famous
Curious Hair wrote:
I guess when you think about it, "capitalism is evil and also women should participate in it to the exclusion of having a loving family" is a weird position, but I'm still trying to crack the code on "transgenders for Palestine," and I kinda have to take these one at a time.

Your avatar change :lol: :lol:

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 9:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.



Is their ignorance vincible, or invincible?

Because that's a pretty important distinction to make.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 9:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
You reference the nuns like it is all the nuns rather than one local house of one order. Even within that group it was most likely only the thoughts of the superior, since they are obedient


Here is the actual statement...

"Instead of promoting unity in our church, our nation, and the world, his comments seem to have fostered division," they wrote. "One of our concerns was the assertion that being a homemaker is the highest calling for a woman. We sisters have dedicated our lives to God and God's people, including the many women whom we have taught and influenced during the past 160 years. These women have made a tremendous difference in the world in their roles as wives and mothers and through their God-given gifts in leadership, scholarship, and their careers."

She does raise a couple of very valid points.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55774
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Franky T wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I guess when you think about it, "capitalism is evil and also women should participate in it to the exclusion of having a loving family" is a weird position, but I'm still trying to crack the code on "transgenders for Palestine," and I kinda have to take these one at a time.

Your avatar change :lol: :lol:

Sophomore year of high school, I bought Airplane! on videocassette and we passed it around health class as sort of a samizdat until by the end of the semester we were all just quoting it constantly. Good times.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.



Is their ignorance vincible, or invincible?

Because that's a pretty important distinction to make.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

Have to assume they can be disabused. Otherwise, what’s the point?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2024 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82060
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.


Appeal to authority. That’s an interesting fallacy

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2024 9:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.



Is their ignorance vincible, or invincible?

Because that's a pretty important distinction to make.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

Have to assume they can be disabused. Otherwise, what’s the point?


I don't think it's a sin to disagree with the speech. But I agree with the point.
How long do you assume before concluding they can't/won't be disabused.

Remember what Christ said to Herod.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2024 10:21 am 
Online
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.


Appeal to authority. That’s an interesting fallacy


You may have a point if that's what I was doing. You've essentially claimed that anyone who had an issue with the content of the speech didn't hear it. That their problems come from some fast moving telephone game or some general antipathy to the Catholics. Therefore, I thought it was reasonable to ask why the nuns had a similar view.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2024 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.



Is their ignorance vincible, or invincible?

Because that's a pretty important distinction to make.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

Have to assume they can be disabused. Otherwise, what’s the point?


I don't think it's a sin to disagree with the speech. But I agree with the point.
How long do you assume before concluding they can't/won't be disabused.

Remember what Christ said to Herod.

Nothing?

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sat Jun 01, 2024 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7147
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Curious Hair wrote:
Franky T wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
I guess when you think about it, "capitalism is evil and also women should participate in it to the exclusion of having a loving family" is a weird position, but I'm still trying to crack the code on "transgenders for Palestine," and I kinda have to take these one at a time.

Your avatar change :lol: :lol:

Sophomore year of high school, I bought Airplane! on videocassette and we passed it around health class as sort of a samizdat until by the end of the semester we were all just quoting it constantly. Good times.


Youngsters. It was my (I believe) my junior year in college. To that point in my life I don't think I had ever laughed as hard as I did when I saw that movie.

EDIT: of course I had to look up the meaning of samizdat. :oops:

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 8:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
The views of the women who helped educate the graduates don't matter because ALL nuns didn't object to the speech. That's an interesting take.

Those who object to the speech for valid reason are no less important than those objecting out of sheer ignorance.



Is their ignorance vincible, or invincible?

Because that's a pretty important distinction to make.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

Have to assume they can be disabused. Otherwise, what’s the point?


I don't think it's a sin to disagree with the speech. But I agree with the point.
How long do you assume before concluding they can't/won't be disabused.

Remember what Christ said to Herod.

Nothing?


Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 8:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
You reference the nuns like it is all the nuns rather than one local house of one order. Even within that group it was most likely only the thoughts of the superior, since they are obedient


The Superior's reference was to this...

32: “This doctrine of the excellence of virginity and of celibacy and of their superiority over the married state was, as we have already said, revealed by our Divine Redeemer and by the Apostle of the Gentiles; so too, it was solemnly defined as a dogma of divine faith by the holy council of Trent, and explained in ...

She was incorrect when she stated that Butker stated that being a homemaker was a higher calling.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 8:48 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
If you think Harrison Butker is bad, check out this well spoken Andrew Tate. He leaves a feminist basically speechless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igvlVx--xDA

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 9:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
You reference the nuns like it is all the nuns rather than one local house of one order. Even within that group it was most likely only the thoughts of the superior, since they are obedient


What's you favorite order? Light 'em up!

My aunt Ethel was a Sister of St. Francis of Mary Immaculate. She went by Sister Mary Candida.

That said, my favorite order is the Order of Discalced Carmelites.

Here's a funny story that illustrates that modern nuns may have the calling, but they're still Millennial brats:

https://stjosephsassociation.org/news/u ... 0monastery.

_________________
Don't take it personally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19017
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Nardi wrote:
If you think Harrison Butker is bad, check out this well spoken Andrew Tate. He leaves a feminist basically speechless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igvlVx--xDA

How do you shut up a feminist? Put your wiener in her mouth.

I didn’t watch the video but I assume this is what he did.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 12:34 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nardi wrote:
If you think Harrison Butker is bad, check out this well spoken Andrew Tate. He leaves a feminist basically speechless.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igvlVx--xDA

How do you shut up a feminist? Put your wiener in her mouth.

I didn’t watch the video but I assume this is what he did.

Metaphorically.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 8:50 pm 
Online
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
If you are around enough church folk and loser men, you'll find that the concensus is families would be better if women shutup and cook. Some women believe it too. I don't personally subscribe to that belief, but I've heard it for 5 decades. It's generally easy to ignore. I think the event triggered me. He could have said it during a press conference after a Super Bowl and I wouldn't have cared. Creating women weakens you.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 8:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.


I totally agree.

The reason for the response from the Benedictine nun was far from what the media portrayed it to be. I just felt that some of Butker's comments about bishops for instance were inappropriate for the occasion.

My wife has had great success with our children, as well as professionally. Being a homemaker is, and will forever be her greatest joy.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
And that’s why patience is necessary.

Somebody can spend five decades misunderstanding a very simple thought and thinking its proponents losers. You can’t give up because an NFL kicker triggered some emotional responses.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82060
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.


Statistics bear out that generally, the young people of this nation have rejected the idea of devotion to corporate work over the last four years. There doesn't need to be a softening of resistance. It's already there according to just about every metric available. "Soft vacation", "antiwork", "quiet quitting" are phrases that did not exist before 2019. It has been trending that way for a couple of decades.

but they are also rejecting having children

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.
I think his message was poorly delivered though. You seem to be trying to change it to "Your work/career doesn't define you" which is something that most people would agree with and no one would really get upset about unless they were your boss. Instead, he went with the "hey ladies, your life doesn't start until you become a homemaker and you never have a career".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82060
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.
I think his message was poorly delivered though. You seem to be trying to change it to "Your work/career doesn't define you" which is something that most people would agree with and no one would really get upset about unless they were your boss. Instead, he went with the "hey ladies, your life doesn't start until you become a homemaker and you never have a career".


No he didn't. He said they will have achieve all kinds of successes in their life but motherhood would be their greatest accomplishment. As I wrote at the beginning of this thread, 100 million women spoke those same words on mother's day.

but I agree, the overall message was poorly delivered. It sounded like a list of grievances rather than supporting points of a central theme

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.
I think his message was poorly delivered though. You seem to be trying to change it to "Your work/career doesn't define you" which is something that most people would agree with and no one would really get upset about unless they were your boss. Instead, he went with the "hey ladies, your life doesn't start until you become a homemaker and you never have a career".

His message wasn’t really about careers, it was about what he believes, as a Catholic, leads to the most purpose filled life. He contrasted that ideal with career accomplishments but he could’ve replaced the titles & promotions bit with the plot of live, laugh, love and it’s the same message.

You seem to be intentionally missing that part of it for some reason.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23749
pizza_Place: Pizanos
good dolphin wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.
I think his message was poorly delivered though. You seem to be trying to change it to "Your work/career doesn't define you" which is something that most people would agree with and no one would really get upset about unless they were your boss. Instead, he went with the "hey ladies, your life doesn't start until you become a homemaker and you never have a career".


No he didn't. He said they will have achieve all kinds of successes in their life but motherhood would be their greatest accomplishment. As I wrote at the beginning of this thread, 100 million women spoke those same words on mother's day.

but I agree, the overall message was poorly delivered. It sounded like a list of grievances rather than supporting points of a central theme

He’s a pro athlete so I think you have to set the bar pretty low.

Like people mugging Caitlin Clark, he attracted eyeballs.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
Brick wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Yes.

With that being said, how do we know when the exercise become pearls before swine?

I think in this type of scenario, which isn’t life or death, you hope the controversy forces people to listen to the actual speech and what was said. They don’t have to receive that message on the first try via an NFL kicker, but maybe it softens their resistance to the idea that the highest possible calling might not be prepping PowerPoints for board meetings.

I don’t see great reason to not have patience with this conversation.
I think his message was poorly delivered though. You seem to be trying to change it to "Your work/career doesn't define you" which is something that most people would agree with and no one would really get upset about unless they were your boss. Instead, he went with the "hey ladies, your life doesn't start until you become a homemaker and you never have a career".


No he didn't. He said they will have achieve all kinds of successes in their life but motherhood would be their greatest accomplishment. As I wrote at the beginning of this thread, 100 million women spoke those same words on mother's day.

but I agree, the overall message was poorly delivered. It sounded like a list of grievances rather than supporting points of a central theme

Quote:
I can tell you that my beautiful wife, Isabelle, would be the first to say that her life truly started when she began living her vocation as a wife and as a mother. I'm on the stage today and able to be the man I am because I have a wife who leans into her vocation. I'm beyond blessed with the many talents God has given me, but it cannot be overstated that all of my success is made possible because a girl I met in band class back in middle school would convert to the faith, become my wife, and embrace one of the most important titles of all: homemaker.

She is a primary educator to our children. She is the one who ensures I never let football or my business become a distraction from that of a husband and father. She is the person that knows me best at my core, and it is through our marriage that, Lord willing, we will both attain salvation.

I say all of this to you because I have seen it firsthand how much happier someone can be when they disregard the outside noise and move closer and closer to God's will in their life. Isabelle's dream of having a career might not have come true, but if you asked her today if she has any regrets on her decision, she would laugh out loud, without hesitation, and say, “Heck, No.”


Again, the bold text and other similar things he said is what got him in trouble and then people were saying it was out of context but it really wasn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harrison Butker
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
His message wasn’t really about careers, it was about what he believes, as a Catholic, leads to the most purpose filled life. He contrasted that ideal with career accomplishments but he could’ve replaced the titles & promotions bit with the plot of live, laugh, love and it’s the same message.

You seem to be intentionally missing that part of it for some reason.

His message was certainly about careers and how women should view them. It may not have been his only message.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 372 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group