It is currently Sat Nov 09, 2024 7:03 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » GENERAL DISCUSSION

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 20 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
NWsider4-3-3
 Post subject: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 12:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3370
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’


Top
 Profile  
 
Minooka Meatball
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 4:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 8010
pizza_Place: Rosati's
k

_________________
Not a mult.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.

_________________
Don't take it personally.
Top
 Profile  
 
W_Z
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37789
Location: ...
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


I built a little empire out of some crazy garbage called the blood of the exploited working class; but they've overcome their shyness now they're calling me your highness; and a world screams "kiss me, son of god".
Top
 Profile  
 
Seacrest
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38209
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today?


That's a fair point.

_________________
Don't take it personally.
Top
 Profile  
 
Zippy-The-Pinhead
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13235
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today?

At least 70 million as of 2020.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today?

At least 70 million as of 2020.


70 million people have a couple billion followers?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43543
pittmike wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today?

At least 70 million as of 2020.


70 million people have a couple billion followers?

Plausibly

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Douchebag wrote:
pittmike wrote:

70 million people have a couple billion followers?

Plausibly


Big if true.

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
Top
 Profile  
 
NWsider4-3-3
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:41 am
Posts: 3370
pizza_Place: Hoagie's Pub
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


lots? who were they and who/what are their historical sources? why did non-christian human sources - who lived decades after Christ, document someone who was crucified in golgotha?
Top
 Profile  
 
Rod
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79336
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
NWsider4-3-3 wrote:
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/

i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven.

what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years.

Quote:
Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’



There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today.


lots? who were they and who/what are their historical sources? why did non-christian human sources - who lived decades after Christ, document someone who was crucified in golgotha?



Athronges, Theudas, and a bunch of other rebels and guys outside the Jewish establishment.

_________________
Don't take it personally.
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40578
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Was Christ indigenous?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43543
pittmike wrote:
Was Christ indigenous?

No, he was white.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91810
Location: To the left of my post
Christ was a great marketer like Trump.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:57 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Douchebag wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Was Christ indigenous?

No, he was white.


Fake news.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43543
Nas wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Was Christ indigenous?

No, he was white.


Fake news.

And a WASP

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 11:03 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81453
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Douchebag wrote:
Nas wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Was Christ indigenous?

No, he was white.


Fake news.

And a WASP


Big if true.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share


“We cannot turn away from this truth in this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration —it is our duty.” -Liz Cheney


Top
 Profile  
 
Nardi
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2024 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31467
pizza_Place: What??
Douchebag wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Was Christ indigenous?

No, he was white.

I agree. I read the Old testament. Almighty Dad has all the traits of a cis white male.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?
Top
 Profile  
 
IkeSouth
 Post subject: Re: The case for Christ
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
christianity is so real they had to rewrite it woke :lol: and its due for another refresh :lol:

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 20 posts ] 

Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » GENERAL DISCUSSION

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group