Too low or too high in your opinion?

_________________

Too low or too high in your opinion?

_________________

Lots of people still make their bets based on the vacuum of the team and not the schedule. They have 7 games against under .500, also 5 games with 9-8 teams. It's a weak schedule and gun to my head, I'd go with the over despite what I think are fairly large weaknesses.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy

I don't think it's a weak schedule. As I said earlier, the Bears may be lucky that they are playing the Titans in Week 1.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

Top half of the schedule is about as weak as it gets. Bottom half is fairly tough. I can see them 6-3 out of the box and not be surprised. And then end up 9-8 or 8-9 too.

Pretty confident there's 8 wins there, just need one more.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy

The line is set to anger and motivate gambling friendly and overly optimistic Bears fans to go the window and bet they'll get 9-10 wins. That makes me think they'll get 8 wins.

I don't hate Poles and he's made some improvements, but we have no idea on Caleb Williams and that roster still needs a lot of work

_________________

I believe most of the money is on the under.

What areas of the roster do you think need a lot of improvement? I have questions about center and another edge rusher, but I'm not sure I see an area that needs a lot of improvement unless there are significant injuries.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

The money is rolling in on Chicago.
The guy in charge of DraftKings said some time ago "we are going to get a ton of Bears money"
The win total has inched up to 9 in some places.

I don't doubt Bears fans are pounding the over. I could be mistaken, but I thought I saw most of the money coming into the sports books was on the under.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

I agree…maybe it just feels the Bears are loaded compared to previous years but combined with an easy schedule, 10+ wins is likely.

_________________

Somebody’s loaded.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance

Caesar's also up to 9 +105 over. Draft Kings is -165 over 8.5. That's a big bite if most of the money is on the under 8.5.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy

You said it...both lines still need work.

The arrow is pointing up, I just wouldn't bet on them being more than 8 wins next year.

_________________

So many things have to go right to get to 10 wins.
How many division wins...3 maybe if things go well.

The Bears could sweep this division. They were a couple of plays away from sweeping the Lions last year. The Bears improved more than the Lions. Who knows what the Vikings will be. Who knows who the real J. Love is?

I'm not predicting a sweep, but I don't think 3 division wins is the ceiling for this team.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

A small inexperienced rookie quarterback and a thin center and guard crew and less than robust running game will make ball possession pretty difficult and that will put a lot of pressure on the defense like it did last year.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip

That Receiver room will aide that. Quite a bit.

I just see that they made a huge mistake in not trading the number one pick. That was a franchise once in a lifetime opportunity and I think that Poles just panicked when he got confused about the worth of CALEB WILLIAMS. Poles now must hope like hell that Williams turns into an immediate Patrick Mahomes. Nothing short of that can or should be acceptable. He gave up a slew of team changing talent for a small quarterback from a college team with no history of developing good let alone great NFL quarterbacks.

Not excuses, Poles, this is all on you.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip

Nothing short of arguably the greatest quarterback ever is acceptable.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

Patrick Mahomes played one game as a rookie.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Nope! If he isn't the best quarterback in the NFL from his first game, it was an AWFUL pick.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

Was he rated as a first round talent?

_________________
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Project

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz

Was he vaxxed?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

As I recall, he wasn't offered a slew of team changing talent. I was on board for a slew of team changing talent and it didn't happen.

_________________
The modern world is divided between those that would numb itself to its meaninglessness through various substances and various hedonisms and those that realize it and go crazy

The argument for picking a QB from a college with history of great NFL QB's is just stupid. Stop. Which college should we be focusing on to draft their QB each year. Which college has the most hall of fame QB's? Notre Dame? Alabama? Miami? How many hall of famer QB's have they developed? Its pretty much a crap shoot with any kid from any college. There isn't one school that churns them out. If you've got a chance to take what you think or what many are saying could be a hall of fame type QB you take him. That is the only plan that works for sustained success. Get a franchise QB. Justin Fields was not. At best he may have been a serviceable QB if he had great talent around him.

_________________
Mulli is Howard Stern in his prime compared to Haugh.

Mahomes? Absolutely he was. Did anyone project him to compete for the title of greatest ever? Absolutely not.


As far as Williams goes I think if he plays and it’s obvious he’s a legit QB at the NFL level then it’s a win for the team and the fans. A lot of the pie in the sky stuff of expecting him to throw for 4000+ yards and 30+ TD’s with a QBR hovering around 100 as a 1st year guy or bust is nonsense. Dudes a rookie, and he’s going to look like a rookie at times. But if he shows good progress and flashes his talent consistently it’s all good.


By seasons end I think a lot of you -if not all of you- will be excited about this kid and his future here.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?