It is currently Fri Sep 20, 2024 12:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 ... 75  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 21791
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Didn’t they trade Fields because he wasn’t great then too according to that logic, if he was great, they wouldn’t have drafted Caleb.


Regardless of whether Fields is on the roster or not, Caleb Williams cannot merely be a "good player". #1 Picks aren't drafted simply to be "good". Particularly in a draft considered to be loaded with talent..

"Good" would be a pretty significant upgrade from Fields in Chicago.

I get you want to set the bar as high as possible but going into a game thinking our qb is probably throwing for over 250 yards would be nice.

Wait, if it's true that "#1 picks aren't drafted simply to be 'good'" then why is it such a crying shame that Justin Fields, himself a #1 pick who was an unmitigated disaster in his rookie season and only marginally better in the years that followed, was jettisoned?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Didn’t they trade Fields because he wasn’t great then too according to that logic, if he was great, they wouldn’t have drafted Caleb.


Regardless of whether Fields is on the roster or not, Caleb Williams cannot merely be a "good player". #1 Picks aren't drafted simply to be "good". Particularly in a draft considered to be loaded with talent..

"Good" would be a pretty significant upgrade from Fields in Chicago.

I get you want to set the bar as high as possible but going into a game thinking our qb is probably throwing for over 250 yards would be nice.


With the No.1 overall pick the objective isn't to draft the best player overall or a "superstar" player. The objective is simply to "upgraðe" over the person that previously held the position. Who knew? Shakes?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick. Of course it is the hope but outperforming Fields by a significant margin would justify moving on from him to Williams.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick.
You don't but Sports GMs do. That's why Bear fans are still lambasting Pace for taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes in 2017.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick.
You don't but Sports GMs do. That's why Bear fans are still lambasting Pace for taking (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes in 2017.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't even get an extension. That's why the pick is lambasted.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick.
You don't but Sports GMs do. That's why Bear fans are still lambasting Pace for taking (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes in 2017.

(Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't even get an extension. That's why the pick is lambasted.

The pick is lambasted much more for passing on Mahomes when you had a chance to draft him.
And again the Bears didn't draft Caleb Williams to be good. They drafted him to be great. If he isn't then it was a wasted pick

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 21791
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
And again the Bears didn't draft Caleb Williams to be good. They drafted him to be great. If he isn't then it was a wasted pick

This is just outright silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick.
You don't but Sports GMs do. That's why Bear fans are still lambasting Pace for taking (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes in 2017.

(Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't even get an extension. That's why the pick is lambasted.

The pick is lambasted much more for passing on Mahomes when you had a chance to draft him.
And again the Bears didn't draft Caleb Williams to be good. They drafted him to be great. If he isn't then it was a wasted pick

If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was still here making pro bowls no one would care.

I'll point out once again (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as a Bear was better than Fields so you aren't really making a good pro-Fields argument either.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 6:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 574
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Bricksonian Logic is never logical. If both are "good" it's still a loss for the Bears. And if Caleb is merely "good" but not "great" it's still a loss for the Bears. You don't draft #1 overall picks to be simply "good". You draft them to be GREAT. The Bears didn't trade Justin Fields because they believed Caleb to be "good". They traded Justin Fields because they believed Caleb Williams would be great. They didn't want to pass on a "Generational Talent". If CW isn't that, or close to that, then it's still a loss for Da Bears


If Caleb is better than Fields, how is that a loss? What the fuck are you talking about?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
If I'm wrong about Caleb then I will own it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
TriColoredPastas wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Bricksonian Logic is never logical. If both are "good" it's still a loss for the Bears. And if Caleb is merely "good" but not "great" it's still a loss for the Bears. You don't draft #1 overall picks to be simply "good". You draft them to be GREAT. The Bears didn't trade Justin Fields because they believed Caleb to be "good". They traded Justin Fields because they believed Caleb Williams would be great. They didn't want to pass on a "Generational Talent". If CW isn't that, or close to that, then it's still a loss for Da Bears


If Caleb is better than Fields, how is that a loss? What the fuck are you talking about?


Who knows actually.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
TriColoredPastas wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Bricksonian Logic is never logical. If both are "good" it's still a loss for the Bears. And if Caleb is merely "good" but not "great" it's still a loss for the Bears. You don't draft #1 overall picks to be simply "good". You draft them to be GREAT. The Bears didn't trade Justin Fields because they believed Caleb to be "good". They traded Justin Fields because they believed Caleb Williams would be great. They didn't want to pass on a "Generational Talent". If CW isn't that, or close to that, then it's still a loss for Da Bears


If Caleb is better than Fields, how is that a loss? What the fuck are you talking about?


Who knows actually.

What about shakes?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 574
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
TriColoredPastas wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Bricksonian Logic is never logical. If both are "good" it's still a loss for the Bears. And if Caleb is merely "good" but not "great" it's still a loss for the Bears. You don't draft #1 overall picks to be simply "good". You draft them to be GREAT. The Bears didn't trade Justin Fields because they believed Caleb to be "good". They traded Justin Fields because they believed Caleb Williams would be great. They didn't want to pass on a "Generational Talent". If CW isn't that, or close to that, then it's still a loss for Da Bears


If Caleb is better than Fields, how is that a loss? What the fuck are you talking about?


Who knows actually.

No one. Is your premise that if Caleb equates Fields' production, which was shit, that the bears should have traded the 2024 first overall pick?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
If I'm wrong about Caleb then I will own it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.


Nah. If he is merely good then it is a wasted pick because they will have missed on guys taken later who will turn out to be great. That's why it is important not to miss on guys when you have the No. 1 pick. You can find "good" qbs without having to waste a No. 1 overall pick on one.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
TriColoredPastas wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Bricksonian Logic is never logical. If both are "good" it's still a loss for the Bears. And if Caleb is merely "good" but not "great" it's still a loss for the Bears. You don't draft #1 overall picks to be simply "good". You draft them to be GREAT. The Bears didn't trade Justin Fields because they believed Caleb to be "good". They traded Justin Fields because they believed Caleb Williams would be great. They didn't want to pass on a "Generational Talent". If CW isn't that, or close to that, then it's still a loss for Da Bears


If Caleb is better than Fields, how is that a loss? What the fuck are you talking about?


Who knows actually.

What about shakes?


Last I heard he still advocates for the annihilation of Palestinians.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:29 pm
Posts: 574
pizza_Place: Enzo's big fat fucking chicken parm rolls
Fuck it I'm with Nas now, I hope Caleb assrapes this entire league and we all get to shit on your face.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
If I'm wrong about Caleb then I will own it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:19 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.


Nah. If he is merely good then it is a wasted pick because they will have missed on guys taken later who will turn out to be great. That's why it is important not to miss on guys when you have the No. 1 pick. You can find "good" qbs without having to waste a No. 1 overall pick on one.


If he's Dak Cousins and Rome is great, why would it be a wasted pick? If he's JaMarcus Russell and Daniels, Maye, and McCarthy are great, that's a different story.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 21791
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I want to know who is on this "good, but not great" list of QBs available to the Bears whom they should have brought in that would make selecting Williams a waste if he is just to be "good" in the NFL. And for a franchise that has been so inept at acquiring QB talent over decades, you definitely take guys who have "good in the NFL" as their floor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 29750
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.

Didn’t you expect Fields to be great drafting at11?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 29750
Pasta is crushing LTG and dude won’t even respond.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 56712
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pasta is crushing LTG and dude won’t even respond.

jimmymeatball is back???

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 8133
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pasta is "Just Asking Questions" and LTG won’t even respond.

FTFY

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.

Didn’t you expect Fields to be great drafting at11?


I didn't know Fields wad balck until after he was drafted. I knew nothing about him.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33972
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.

Didn’t you expect Fields to be great drafting at11?


I didn't know Fields wad balck until after he was drafted. I knew nothing about him.


I don't know if you're joking. Because I didn't know he was black either. Until we drafted him. I don't watch or follow college football. I heard of his name around draft day. Didn't know if he was black or white.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2024 10:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Beardown wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
No one selects a player first overall that they don't expect to be great. It's not a wasted pick if that guy is good. Most picks don't reach that level. Yes, I would prefer Caleb to be better than Patrick Mahomes than to be Dak Prescott. I won't cut him if he ends up being Dak Cousins.

Didn’t you expect Fields to be great drafting at11?


I didn't know Fields wad balck until after he was drafted. I knew nothing about him.


I don't know if you're joking. Because I didn't know he was black either. Until we drafted him. I don't watch or follow college football. I heard of his name around draft day. Didn't know if he was black or white.


I'm dead serious. I heard the name and assumed he was white. I knew Lance was balck because someone posted his picture here.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2024 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72347
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick. Of course it is the hope but outperforming Fields by a significant margin would justify moving on from him to Williams.

Caleb is on the very short list of best QB prospects in the history of the sport. He's going to a situation that's better than any situation for a number 1 pick in recent memory, maybe ever. If Odunze lives up to the caliber of prospect he is, Caleb has arguably the best WR group in the NFL. Stroud and Herbert are very recent examples of QBs who were great as rookies, Caleb is a better prospect than both with a better supporting cast than either had.

It's realistic and fair to expect Caleb to be great.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2024 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 22691
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick. Of course it is the hope but outperforming Fields by a significant margin would justify moving on from him to Williams.

Caleb is on the very short list of best QB prospects in the history of the sport. He's going to a situation that's better than any situation for a number 1 pick in recent memory, maybe ever. If Odunze lives up to the caliber of prospect he is, Caleb has arguably the best WR group in the NFL. Stroud and Herbert are very recent examples of QBs who were great as rookies, Caleb is a better prospect than both with a better supporting cast than either had.

It's realistic and fair to expect Caleb to be great.

You’re right about all of that…but don’t forget Eberflus.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 10924
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Line is hurt so caleb may not play this week?

https://dawindycity.com/posts/injuries-likely-to-force-bears-to-change-caleb-williams-plan-01j4h2atv7sc


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
I don't think it's realistic to expect greatness from any pick. Of course it is the hope but outperforming Fields by a significant margin would justify moving on from him to Williams.

Caleb is on the very short list of best QB prospects in the history of the sport. He's going to a situation that's better than any situation for a number 1 pick in recent memory, maybe ever. If Odunze lives up to the caliber of prospect he is, Caleb has arguably the best WR group in the NFL. Stroud and Herbert are very recent examples of QBs who were great as rookies, Caleb is a better prospect than both with a better supporting cast than either had.

It's realistic and fair to expect Caleb to be great.

You are cherry picking players here. Herbert and Stroud weren't even the first qbs taken in their draft. We can look at them in hindsight and say they were great.

It's pretty random how a QB performs in year 1 and how it projects to being an elite QB. Lots of HOF QBs either didn't play or didn't play well in their rookie year. Other QBs were great as rookies and fell off.

In the context of "Should the Bears have moved on from Fields" then Williams even being a good quarterback would make it the right choice.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:08 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 80113
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He's playing.

_________________
Nas: Blago, who has single handedly destroyed CFMB?

Blago: https://youtube.com/shorts/Lftdxd-YXt8?feature=share

Mind you own damn business! -VP Walz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 ... 75  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group