It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 3:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Aren't some of these guys the propspects that were being "tossed around" in a deal the Braves were trying to complete for Peavy? I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'...........

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:14 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
spanky wrote:
Aren't some of these guys the propspects that were being "tossed around" in a deal the Braves were trying to complete for Peavy? I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'...........


I don't think you can ever rule out Williams making a move like that, but I really do believe he's trying to rebuild the farm system/team on the fly. Plus, Peavy wants that option year picked up at $22 million.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
BD wrote:
spanky wrote:
Beardown wrote:
Big Fan, salary dumps of bad players is a good thing. Don't you get that?

200+ innings and 200 K's - I'd be careful what you wish for.

He just didn't bow to the throne of Ozzie, so he had to go. At this point, salary dump.......but probably leading to another move I would think.


Ozzie didn't like him because he melted down in big games. He's got some plus's, but his 4.50 ERA is not one of them.

Precisely. The 4 biggest games of the year for him (maybe of his career even) he wet the bed. Could not even make it out of the 4th inning. All the Sox asked of him was a medicore start- 7IP, 4R, 9H, something like that. At least keep the Sox in the game. @NYY, @MIN, CLE, @TB he did not do that, he got absolutely lit up. So, Kenny and Ozzie are probably thinking, "If we're in a playoff chase again next season, can we trust Javy?"

Answer: a resounding NO.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
BD wrote:
Ozzie didn't like him because he melted down in big games. He's got some plus's, but his 4.50 ERA is not one of them.

Which Ozzie demonstrated by throwing him out there every 3 days down the stretch - all of them "big games". But we don't need to re-hash that anymore.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
This is a pretty good trade for the Sox. I would've liked to see them wait a little longer but Ole Kenny fell in love with Tyler Flowers during the AZ fall league and got his man. Acquiring Brent Lillibridge is a little confusing. He certainly upgrades the team speed but unless he can play CF this creates a glut of middle infielders. The other two in the deal are suspects that can be used in future trades.

Now Kenny needs to replace Javy's 200+ innings. I don't think it will be done by either Clayton Richard or Jeff Marquez so he needs to add a veteran starter either through a trade or free agency. Booner can be replaced in house by either Joseph Torres or Aaron Poreda though I'd like to see him remain a starter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
spanky wrote:
BD wrote:
Ozzie didn't like him because he melted down in big games. He's got some plus's, but his 4.50 ERA is not one of them.

Which Ozzie demonstrated by throwing him out there every 3 days down the stretch - all of them "big games". But we don't need to re-hash that anymore.

Catch 22. Ozzie took heat for marching a sucky Vazquez out there. Had he decided to go with Richard (and he flopped), he would have taken heat for starting a rookie in such big games when he has a proven veteran sitting on the bench.

If Quentin were healthy down the stretch, the Sox would have wrapped up that division 4 or 5 days before they did, and would have at least taken Tampa to a 5th game, and may have beat them.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82242
Mitigating factors: pitching on short rest for that entire period and all four of those teams were hot at the end of the season

I expect him to win 12-15 games, have a low 4 ERA and pitch 200 innings next year for Atlanta.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
Mitigating factors: pitching on short rest for that entire period and all four of those teams were hot at the end of the season


Mitigating factors: He has no balls and gets worse as games get bigger.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
I like the move if:

the 220 innings 200ks can be replaced ,

more bullpen help is on the way,

and if one of these 2b/3b guys works out.



KW likes to stockpile young players to make bigger moves, so we'll see what happens.. i have a feeling there's more to be done...

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
K's are overrated. I'd rather a half to a full point lower in ERA, and 4 or 5 more wins.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
they could be overrated, idk thats for the sabermetricians to look at... but on a below average defensive team, i'll take ks...

to me, the 200 ip/k thing is more important because it shows a guy can throw deep counts without fatiguing and wearing out your bullpen.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
It's impossible to truely evaluate this deal until a year or two from now. You have to see if any of the prospects pan out or not. However, just being rid of Vasquez and his contract, is already a positive. I agree, that Dye is next and will likely be dealt sooner, rather than later. I'll be very curious to see just how much of the money they will have cut from salaries is reinvested in new aquisitions and how much is just cut from the budget. I'll bet more than half is just kept in the till. The way things look, this may be a team that will be taking a 1-2 year period to develop young players, before they are ready to contend again. After this coming season Thome will be gone, then after him it will just be Konerko left, to dump. For those hoping to trade Konerko, with 2 bad seasons back to back, and a big contract, he is virtually untradeable-even if he did not have a no trade contract, which he does. While the younger players they are dealing for develop, expect a drop in the standings Sox fans. Thats not to say that Kenny is doing the wrong thing here. Just that younger players make more mistakes and need to adjust to the higher level of play. Kenny is right to do what he's doing, but it will mean that the Sox will likely slip in the standings in 2009. As a result...The Sox fans will whine in 2009!!

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
it will mean that the Sox will likely slip in the standings in 2009. As a result...The Sox fans will whine in 2009!!

For this to happen, the Indians and Tigers must flip thier W-L totals from last year. I doubt that will happen.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:50 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Montgomery
Apologist wrote:
to me, the 200 ip/k thing is more important because it shows a guy can throw deep counts without fatiguing and wearing out your bullpen.


Innings pitched & Strikeouts = OVER RATED. If you lose the game what does it matter? If the guy was making low money then great, you have a a little money in to protect your pen. Once the guy gets paid big bucks he better do more than pitch a lot of innings and lose games. Anyone from the farm system can pitch innings if you aren't going to win the game.

_________________
Paws Up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Innings is not overrated. Javy has shown he is durable if nothing else.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:50 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Montgomery
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Innings is not overrated.


How so? If you're not winning the game what does it matter. You can throw anybody out there for $1mil a year and he can pitch 9 innings every fifth game. Are you going to win many, no - But he pitched the innings.

_________________
Paws Up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
200 IP shows that you are keeping your team in the game (for the most part), and that you do not spend time on the DL.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
bwfalcon wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Innings is not overrated.

You can throw anybody out there for $1mil a year and he can pitch 9 innings every fifth game.


Sabathia @ 1mil a year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Murph had a guy on from Baseball America, and he didn't sound too enthusiastic about Flowers. He said Flowers is the 7th best prospect in the Braves' system, and would be 3rd or 4th for the Sox (behind Beckham, the new Cuban guy, and possibly Poreda). In his view, Flowers is suspect defensively and won't hit for a high average in the majors. I didn't hear him say anything about Flowers' slugging potential. Inexplicably, Murph cut him off when he started to talk about the other prospects.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 12:50 pm
Posts: 1530
Location: Montgomery
Frank Coztansa wrote:
200 IP shows that you are keeping your team in the game (for the most part), and that you do not spend time on the DL.


Yes, and his record shows that they lose the majority of those games. So now you're out a ton of money and 1 game. You can manage a loss for a lot less money.

_________________
Paws Up


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Being the 7th rated prospect in the Braves organization is nothing to sneeze about because they are absolutely stacked with minor league talent. Being 4th on the Sox isn't bad either because they are very top heavy. Beckham, Viciedo and Poreda are all legit but there is a big drop off after those 3 (now 4).

There are MAJOR questions about Flowers' abilty to be a full time catcher. He doesn't have a strong arm and he's not very good at blocking pitches but he can hit the hell out of the ball so there will always be a place for him to play. If he has to move to 1B it will hurt his value a bit because big-time offensive catchers are very rare. I like the deal but as I said earlier I want to see how Kenny replaces Javy's 200+ innings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vazquez: He Gone?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
One caveat to Flowers' game is his 50 game suspension for the use of PED's that he served at the beginning of the '07 season. Flowers, for his part, admitted to the mistake saying that he used bad judgment as a member of Chipola CC's baseball team. Didn't Quentin use Performance Enhancing Drugs??????

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Vazquez Trade Official
PostPosted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Sox seal Vazquez deal with Braves
Six-player trade nets Chicago four talented prospects
By Kelly Thesier / MLB.com


Javier Vazquez's time in Chicago has come to an end.

On Thursday morning, the White Sox and Braves announced the six-player trade that will send Vazquez and left-handed reliever Boone Logan to Atlanta in exchange for infielder Brent Lillibridge, catcher Tyler Flowers, third baseman Jon Gilmore and left-handed pitcher Santos Rodriguez.

The two teams agreed to terms on the deal Tuesday night, but it was not finalized until all players passed their physicals.

By trading Vazquez, the White Sox have freed up a considerable amount of money while also going with the club's plan to go younger and more athletic with its roster. Vazquez, 32, is under contract through 2010 and will earn $11.5 million in each of the next two seasons.

There had been musings all offseason that the White Sox would move Vazquez, not only due to payroll but because his manager, Ozzie Guillen, publicly criticized the pitcher when he struggled down the stretch in 2008. The right-hander went 0-4 with a 13.22 ERA in his final four starts, including a loss in Game 1 of the American League Divisional Series.

But the White Sox will also have to figure out how to replace Vazquez in the rotation. Despite his recent struggles, Vazquez provided the White Sox with more than 200 innings in each of the previous three seasons.

Currently, the only three pitchers locked in for the White Sox rotation next season are left-handers Mark Buehrle and John Danks and right-hander Gavin Floyd.

The White Sox might now be searching for pitching, but this trade gives them more than enough young infielders. Lillibridge, 25, will join Josh Fields, Wilson Betemit, Alexei Ramirez, Jayson Nix, Chris Getz and Dayan Viciedo in competing for three open infield spots. Ramirez, who is being moved to shortstop, appears to be the only lock for a job right now.

Lillibridge entered the 2008 season as one of the top prospects in the Braves' farm system. Although he struggled offensively last season, hitting just .220 in 90 games with Triple-A Richmond, Lillibridge brings a tremendous amount of speed to the Sox roster. He's been successful in 127 of his 162 stolen base attempts in the Minors.


The White Sox also added talent in areas other than the infield with the trade. Flowers, 22, is considered to be the most highly touted prospect in the deal, and he caught the attention of many people, including White Sox general manager Ken Williams, while playing in the Arizona Fall League this year. Flowers batted .387 with 12 home runs and 23 RBIs in 20 games for the Mesa Solar Sox. The catcher was coming off a season in which he was named to the Carolina League All-Star team after hitting .288 with 17 home runs and 88 RBIs at high Class A Myrtle Beach.

But the 6-foot-4, 245-pound Flowers, like the other two players the Sox acquired in the deal, is still considered to be a few years away from the Majors. Scouts have raved about Flowers' offensive potential, yet they say he needs to improve defensively if he is to catch at the Major League level.

Gilmore, 20, hit .186 in 27 games with Class A Rome this past season. While with Rookie-level Danville in 2007, he hit .337 with four homers and a .473 slugging percentage.

Rodriguez, 20, went 1-2 with a 2.79 ERA in 14 relief appearances for the Gulf Coast League Braves this year. In 29 innings, he recorded 45 strikeouts and issued 13 walks.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group