It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:12 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
DE and WR are equal in my mind. I don't think you can go wrong with either. The problems with the defense stem from a lack of pass rush IMO, and nothing more. They'll need at least one guard and maybe another tackle from somewhere too. I know you're optimistic about St. Clair at guard but I'm not. I'd have to look at tape to make up my mind for sure.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Nas wrote:
dominant .


The second time I have been floored by your use of the word in the last day.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
1- QB (if a franchise QB is available. If not wait another year :( )
2- O-line
3- O-line
4- Safety

I think the d-line may improve with Rod Marinelli in the mix.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:07 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Thug wrote:
1- QB (if a franchise QB is available. If not wait another year :( )
2- O-line
3- O-line
4- Safety

I think the d-line may improve with Rod Marinelli in the mix.


Any priority list that does not have WR in the top 4 is wayyyyy off.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
dominant .


The second time I have been floored by your use of the word in the last day.


:lol: You didn't like the way St. Clair pancaked guys when he wasn't on an island?


I just think the guy is a product of low expectations.

By the way, he is a FA and said he expects to start wherever he lands.

I would rather draft on OG and plug him in on the right side...but I have wanted to do that for the last two years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
They helped him for the first half of the season. Towards the end he was brutal. Their priorities should be o-line, d-line, WR. I'd be willing to put WR as #2 if the defensive unit would start producing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
We have too many holes to fill, imo. That is way WR is a secondary priority. Pigskin starts in line and ours is marginal at best. If Chris Williams doesn't workout we're really screwed. Tait is done. And we still need guard help. We can get by another year w/out a prime time WR with an upgraded line & Forte. If Marinelli can help our d-line get it's pass rush on we'll be in business.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:37 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Thug wrote:
We have too many holes to fill, imo. That is way WR is a secondary priority.


I agree with too many holes to fill, which is why I would put QB as a secondary priority and a WR as a top priority. Orton and a decent veteran backup will be fine for next year. But Marty Booker, Brandon Lloyd, etc are not going to cut it for another year. Plus, if you upgrade at WR, then it will also help Orton be better while opening things up more for Forte and the TE's.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Last edited by RFDC on Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Thug wrote:
We have too many holes to fill.

ok ill tip it in...Thats what she said


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
pizza_Place: Cheese
The priorities, in my opinion, are WR and safety. If you can go out and get a TJ or Boldin you go and get them. I think the best fit for the Bears would be Boldin, because of his ability yards after catch ability. He runs the short routes really well, which should open up some the offense for Hester and the likes. I dont know who is available at safety but if I see Daniel Manning back there again I may vomit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
pizza_Place: Cheese
Oh and the defense was terrible, NEW SCHEME PLEASE. Not likely to happen though just a wish.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
The defense has been on a downward spiral since the Super Bowl season. There is no reason to believe that won't continue.

WR should be #1 priority in both free agency AND the draft.
Then just fill holes as quick as you can.
Find a QB in the draft in rounds 2-4 that you feel can play by year 2 if needed.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Nas wrote:
Why not just trade the 2nd pick for a guy like McNabb? Based on the Bears history McNabb is likely to be better than any guy they pick up will be and he is only 32. That gives them a good 5 or 6 years to get something done.


Joe Banner said McNabb will be back with the team next year...I don't think trading for him is an option...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Why not just trade the 2nd pick for a guy like McNabb? Based on the Bears history McNabb is likely to be better than any guy they pick up will be and he is only 32. That gives them a good 5 or 6 years to get something done.

1) Because there is no way the Eagles would trade him to the Bears. They would send him to some AFC team where he could only beat them in the Super Bowl. Imagine how dumb they would look if they traded him to an NFC team, and that NFC team knocked them out of the playoffs.

2) Because 32 is old for a QB. He's got a lot of mileage on him. We also don't have a good idea on how he would do long term without Brian Westbrook. I'm of the belief that Brian Westbrook is what really made that offense move.

3) I'm not sure McNabb would want to come here. We aren't exactly a dream offense for a QB right now. This changes if we get a quality WR somehow but I think expecting McNabb and a top WR is expecting too much.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 1:37 am
Posts: 317
If I were GM, I would;

Try and sign Houshmanzuianaiuiuhazezaih, giving the QB, Orton, a talented reciver he can count on.
Is he a true number one? I dont know, but hes three or four notches better than anyone on the Bears.

Draft Oher, who's stock has dropped considerably and might be there, if not, Vontae should be there, and he's the best player in the draft.

_________________
Iam THE authority of Chicago sports, thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
That's fair. I don't completely agree with all of that. We didn't see Westbrook in any game of the playoffs and Forte is above average catching the ball. I'm still of the belief that a good/great quarterback would make the Bears a serious contender if they could also add a guy like Housmanzadeh. I think Orton is good enough to win with but I don't think you could ever win because of him. I thought he had the potential to be a better version of Brian Griese but I'm not too sure now. The Bears need a guy that can throw the ball down the field and Orton has really struggled throughout his career doing that. It's not that he doesn't have the arm strength it's he just doesn't have the touch.

No matter who is playing QB next year, the WR needs to be upgraded to give any of them a chance. McNabb would definately be an upgrade.

I'm not ready to give up on Orton, but if he doesn't improve his play from last year next year I'll have no reservations about doing it. I'll have even higher standards if Angelo does a good job of upgrading the other talent.

WR and QB both need more production next year. I think everyone agrees with that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Punter
Long Snapper
Driver of the Injury Cart
Doug & OB
3rd QB
Announcers
Beer Vendors

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
TJ is a legit #1 but he's 32.
32 on the other hand for a QB means they can play another 3-5 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
pizza_Place: Cheese
^ another reason Boldin may be a better choice, he is a little younger...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:35 pm
Posts: 18202
Location: Headed to the 19th hole
pizza_Place: Kaisers
With the Packers moving to a 3-4 defense next year it appears that they are
going to have to try to move Aaron Kampman to a LB spot. I don't think he
is going to do very well there. Not sure what it would take, maybe a high
draft pick, but the Bears would love to have that guy at DE and the Packers
need all kinds of help. I know it would be a long shot but I think worth
considering.

_________________
Flew too close to the sun on wings of pastrami


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
pizza_Place: Cheese
he did play in only 12 games this year, but still had 89 receptions and 1,000+ yards. One could make the argument that he gets a lot of receptions because of teams having to have to double cover Fitzgerald, I still think he would be a better option in free agency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 6
pizza_Place: Cheese
I believe you are right, I was speaking acquiring Boldin via trade. It seems that Mr. Angelo doesnt always evaluate talent very well, especially on the offensive side of the ball in the first round (excluding Chris WIlliams). He found Forte in the second round so he isnt included, but if you can get a proven WR with that crappy mid first round pick i think you go for it. Now that is best case scenario and not likely to happen but jsut my opinion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Quote:
It seems that Mr. Angelo doesnt always evaluate talent very well, especially on the offensive side of the ball in the first round


This is why he needs to go. Most successful teams are built from their drafts not in FA.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], The Doctor Of Style, Zippy-The-Pinhead and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group