W_Z wrote:
blackwater, the saints are a perfect example of a team that proves you wrong. they have a fantastic QB but because their defense stinks to high heaven, they haven't done a goddamn thing.
Proves me wrong in what way? I'm not saying having a great QB guaranties you anything. All I'm saying is it gives a chance every year. Moreover my greater point was that you hardly if ever see a team win the Super Bowl that doesn't have a star QB. Look Super Bowl 41 was nice for the fans and it was great for the city and I cheered them on even though I didn't think they had a chance in hell. One could actually argue that the Bears getting there actually hindered there growth simply because the team looked at that success and over valued there own players and started paying out big contracts to players that had great seasons that year and have yet to even come close to that since. They used a lot of smoke and mirrors that season. The offense and defense was solid for about 6 games and then they started to look very pedestrian. Even though they won most of the remaining games you could easily see they were flawed. Again as I said they were the best of a bunch of average teams that season and whoever made it from the AFC was going to win.
Let me put it to you this way if you had the chance of getting a potential 25yr old franchise QB or make it to, but get your ass kicked in, one Super Bowl what would you choose?
Also Urlacher is and was great for this team and I'm not trying to diminish his roll and success in recent years. My point is a QB that has the ball in his hands for half the game (or so..) has a greater impact on the outcome of the game than a MIKE LB. Make the QB a star QB and its even a greater impact.
Adding the below to further validate my point, stolen from another thread:
Irish Boy wrote:
Alstott, Dunn, and Lewis were never elite RBs. But even so, the list of super bowl QBs over the past 15 years:
Aikman
Young
Aikman
Favre
Elway
Elway
Warner
Dilfer
Brady
Johnson
Brady
Brady
Roethlisberger
P. Manning
E. Manning
Roethlisberger
Two names stick out like sore thumbs on that list, and they are the two you cited. The list of starting RBs for that period:
E. Smith
Watters
E. Smith
Bennett
Davis
Davis
M. Faulk
J. Lewis
Antowain Smith (!)
Dunn
A. Smith/K. Faulk
Dillon
Parker
Addai
Jacobs
Parker
There's a lot more mediocrity on the second list than the first, and the three best RBs (Emmitt Smith, Terrell Davis, and Marshall Faulk) had hall of fame QBs as well. And even in the examples you gave, the reason the team won the Super Bowl wasn't because of their amazing ground game; it was because they had all-time, historically great defenses.