It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:57 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
19th in the league according to Fox Sports

Fox Sports wrote:
Well, at least now the Bears finally have one legitimate, top-shelf QB. They just may not have anyone behind him if Cutler ever gets hurt. First, how good is Cutler? Critics point to his offseason pouting in Denver, his 18 interceptions in 2008 and fact that he's never led a team to the playoffs. But he did have a horrible defense in Denver, which on paper the Bears should be an improvement. But Caleb Hanie and Brett Basanez as backups? Chicago's front office should be ashamed to head into the season with no proven backup.



http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9735 ... ?gt1=39002

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Obviously that writer does not know the greatness that is Caleb Hanie.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
if its any consolation, denver is ranked last.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Hanie = Micah Hoff.


I'm still perplexed at anyone who thinks Hanie is a better option than Grossman. Once Grossman knew he wasn't going to get a starting position, he was the perfect option for the Bears. The fact that Basanez is even being mentioned is downright silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Hanie = Micah Hoff.


I'm still perplexed at anyone who thinks Hanie is a better option than Grossman. Once Grossman knew he wasn't going to get a starting position, he was the perfect option for the Bears. The fact that Basanez is even being mentioned is downright silly.


So, am I to understand Grossman would have signed for Hanie money? Let us not forget salary-cap considerations. That makes the marginal value of Hanie > Grossman.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Killer V wrote:
19th in the league according to Fox Sports

Fox Sports wrote:
Well, at least now the Bears finally have one legitimate, top-shelf QB. They just may not have anyone behind him if Cutler ever gets hurt. First, how good is Cutler? Critics point to his offseason pouting in Denver, his 18 interceptions in 2008 and fact that he's never led a team to the playoffs. But he did have a horrible defense in Denver, which on paper the Bears should be an improvement. But Caleb Hanie and Brett Basanez as backups? Chicago's front office should be ashamed to head into the season with no proven backup.



http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9735 ... ?gt1=39002


The Bears are ranked in the lower half of the league by Fox Sports because they have unknown backup QB's, and their starter hasn't overcome a god awful defense.

Sounds reasonable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:06 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
How is Tom Brady ranked #6?

How is Tony Romo ranked #3?

How is Peyton Manning ranked #7?

Jay Cutler is better than Flacco, Cassel, Pennington, Schaub, Edwards, Ryan, Palmer, and Delhomme.

He's in league with several of the others who are ranked higher.

This writer is an idiot.

Case closed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43569
BD wrote:
How is Tom Brady ranked #6?

How is Tony Romo ranked #3?

How is Peyton Manning ranked #7?

Jay Cutler is better than Flacco, Cassel, Pennington, Schaub, Edwards, Ryan, Palmer, and Delhomme.

He's in league with several of the others who are ranked higher.

This writer is an idiot.

Case closed.

This article ranks the best QB packages, meaning your entire roster of QB's. I think the list isn't perfect, but I think Bears fit in at just about the right spot. If anything, the Bears should be ranked lower on the list. They have 2 backups that haven't even played a down in the regular season. If Cutler goes down for this team, the season will be a disaster.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Last edited by Douchebag on Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:12 pm 
Romo is the most overrated quarterback in the NFL currently.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Hanie = Micah Hoff.


I'm still perplexed at anyone who thinks Hanie is a better option than Grossman. Once Grossman knew he wasn't going to get a starting position, he was the perfect option for the Bears. The fact that Basanez is even being mentioned is downright silly.


So, am I to understand Grossman would have signed for Hanie money? Let us not forget salary-cap considerations. That makes the marginal value of Hanie > Grossman.



Grossman signed for $620k for 1 year. As for Hanie, he signed a three-year, $1.155 million contract.


Either way... the Bears have A LOT of money to play with this year. And spending some on backing up the most important position in sports makes sense to me. Especially considering how many Chicago Bears backup QBs have played in my lifetime.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Nas wrote:
BD wrote:
How is Tom Brady ranked #6?

How is Tony Romo ranked #3?

How is Peyton Manning ranked #7?

Jay Cutler is better than Flacco, Cassel, Pennington, Schaub, Edwards, Ryan, Palmer, and Delhomme.

He's in league with several of the others who are ranked higher.

This writer is an idiot.

Case closed.


Agreed




Douchebag wrote:
This article ranks the best QB packages, meaning your entire roster of QB's. I think the list isn't perfect, but I think Bears fit in at just about the right spot. If anything, the Bears should be ranked lower on the list. They have 2 backups that haven't even played a down in the regular season. If Cutler goes down for this team, the season will be a disaster.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Chris in St. Charles wrote:
Hanie = Micah Hoff.


I'm still perplexed at anyone who thinks Hanie is a better option than Grossman. Once Grossman knew he wasn't going to get a starting position, he was the perfect option for the Bears. The fact that Basanez is even being mentioned is downright silly.


So, am I to understand Grossman would have signed for Hanie money? Let us not forget salary-cap considerations. That makes the marginal value of Hanie > Grossman.



Grossman signed for $620k for 1 year. As for Hanie, he signed a three-year, $1.155 million contract.


Either way... the Bears have A LOT of money to play with this year. And spending some on backing up the most important position in sports makes sense to me. Especially considering how many Chicago Bears backup QBs have played in my lifetime.


Well I'll be damned. Shows what I know.

Is Hanie's $1.155 deal an aggregate or per-annum? Even if it's the latter, I still think it's better because at least he hasn't proved to be a nincompoop on the field. As long as he can tie his shoes, I'll go with the unknown vs the known (and known to be 'ick').

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
I haven't seen you play QB either. I'm not paying you $5 to do it just because Rex Grossman is bad though.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Irish Boy wrote:
I haven't seen you play QB either. I'm not paying you $5 to do it just because Rex Grossman is bad though.


Wonderful retort, dope.

Might I add, nobody gives a shit what you would pay for what anyway; it has nothing to do with the point in question ... you know - doing the same thing, expecting different results, etc.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Don Tiny wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
I haven't seen you play QB either. I'm not paying you $5 to do it just because Rex Grossman is bad though.


Wonderful retort, dope.

Might I add, nobody gives a shit what you would pay for what anyway; it has nothing to do with the point in question ... you know - doing the same thing, expecting different results, etc.


Quote:
I still think it's better because at least he hasn't proved to be a nincompoop on the field. As long as he can tie his shoes, I'll go with the unknown vs the known


I wouldn't pay you $5 if I were a GM. I wouldn't let your sorry ass count as 15 cents against the salary cap just because you could be cheap and shitty. Is that better? There are degrees of difference, even in the realm of bad, and marginal improvements require marginally higher expenditures. Dope.

And I suppose that's one definition of idiocy. Another is doing something stupid and expecting good results. There's no improvement in itself in watching someone new be shitty as opposed to watching someone old be shitty. Your mileage may vary. You may get a kick at watching new, all-different football players fuck up on the field, just so that you can say to yourself, "ah yes, now we know that Caleb Hanie truly does suck". But I don't particularly care about your idiosyncratic jollies. I'd rather have someone marginally less bad than someone more bad. I'd imagine that all GMs would agree.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Wildcard_630 wrote:
Romo is the most overrated quarterback in the NFL currently.


Image

But his girlfriend is the sexy Freddy Kruger.

btw - is that a Starter hat Romo is wearing??? You can take the boy out of Cheeseland, but you can't take the Cheeseland out of the boy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Wildcard_630 wrote:
Romo is the most overrated quarterback in the NFL currently.

I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but what makes Tony Romo worse than Jay Cutler?

Cutler put up great yardage numbers, but there is more to the position than yardage.

I'd personally put Cutler and Romo on the same tier. They are on the second tier of NFL QB's with probably 5 others. The top tier consists of Brady, Manning, and Brees.

Tony Romo gets a bad rap because he ends up in the gossip magazines but he's still better than a large majority of NFL QB's.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Wildcard_630 wrote:
Romo is the most overrated quarterback in the NFL currently.

I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but what makes Tony Romo worse than Jay Cutler?

Cutler put up great yardage numbers, but there is more to the position than yardage.

I'd personally put Cutler and Romo on the same tier. They are on the second tier of NFL QB's with probably 5 others. The top tier consists of Brady, Manning, and Brees.

Tony Romo gets a bad rap because he ends up in the gossip magazines but he's still better than a large majority of NFL QB's.


I think "physical tools" wise, Cutler has much more than Romo. Romo has great feet and a knack for getting the ball in the right place, but Cutler has great feet, the knack for getting the ball in the right place and (according to scouts) the second strongest arm in the NFL (behind JaMarcus Russell).

It's this arm strength that really seperates him from Romo - and it's also what makes him such a great fit for the windy Nov/Dec games in Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
mel junior wrote:
I think "physical tools" wise, Cutler has much more than Romo. Romo has great feet and a knack for getting the ball in the right place, but Cutler has great feet, the knack for getting the ball in the right place and (according to scouts) the second strongest arm in the NFL (behind JaMarcus Russell).

It's this arm strength that really seperates him from Romo - and it's also what makes him such a great fit for the windy Nov/Dec games in Chicago.

Why does that make him a better QB though? If you compared "physical tools" between Cutler and Peyton Manning you would likely give the nod to Cutler.

I think the fact that the strongest arm in the league is supposedly Jamarcus Russell goes to show how that is not a major determining factor as to how good a QB is as long as you have a good one.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
mel junior wrote:
I think "physical tools" wise, Cutler has much more than Romo. Romo has great feet and a knack for getting the ball in the right place, but Cutler has great feet, the knack for getting the ball in the right place and (according to scouts) the second strongest arm in the NFL (behind JaMarcus Russell).

It's this arm strength that really seperates him from Romo - and it's also what makes him such a great fit for the windy Nov/Dec games in Chicago.

Why does that make him a better QB though? If you compared "physical tools" between Cutler and Peyton Manning you would likely give the nod to Cutler.

I think the fact that the strongest arm in the league is supposedly Jamarcus Russell goes to show how that is not a major determining factor as to how good a QB is as long as you have a good one.


That wasn't my point - my point was that he is equal to Romo in every category (mobility, smarts, leadership) and exceeds him greatly in arm strength. That makes him a better quarterback. It's probably worth mentioning that, at least this season, Romo has a better receiving corps around him than Cutler.

Comparing Cutler to Manning and Brady, Cutler is not Manning/Brady's equal in smarts or leadership, but probably has both of them in mobility and arm strength - and because of that they (Manning/Brady) are the better QB.

I think I just combined Manning and Brady into some kind of uber-QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37835
Location: ...
romo is aspiring to be the next mcnabb.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1568
On the Sunday morning ESPN show Schlereth called Aaron Rodgers FAR AND AWAY the best QB in the division.

A little biased there Bronco boy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37835
Location: ...
bitter grapes!!1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
enigma wrote:
On the Sunday morning ESPN show Schlereth called Aaron Rodgers FAR AND AWAY the best QB in the division.

A little biased there Bronco boy?


Sounds about right.

Rick - Brees is not on Brady or Manning's level.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
FavreFan wrote:
enigma wrote:
On the Sunday morning ESPN show Schlereth called Aaron Rodgers FAR AND AWAY the best QB in the division.

A little biased there Bronco boy?


Sounds about right.

Rick - Brees is not on Brady or Manning's level.


Come on now FF, I get that you are a Packer lover, but even you cannot say that Rodgers is FAR AND AWAY the best in the division?

The guy has had one strong year, what else has he done? I think Cutler and Rodgers are pretty close and to say either one is far and away the best is just silly.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Rick - Brees is not on Brady or Manning's level.

Well, he hasn't done it for as long and he doesn't have a ring, but he was better than both of them last year.

Put him on the second level then with Warner.

Rodgers would still not be on that level.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brees is probably on that 2nd tier with Warner and Rivers. I think Rodgers is there too, I dont blame you for disagreeing.

RFDC - I was half kidding. He's not WAY better than Cutler but I do think he is better. Of course he's only done it for one year, thats all he's been given. And that was a great year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears QB Ranking
PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Glad to hear that FF, I have always considered you an objective fan.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style, USA and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group