It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 413 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
NSJ wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quit using circular logic.


Do you know what circular logic is?

yes. yes I do.

It was a veiled reference to a seinfeld line. my point is the reds suck and your diverting attention away from that increasingly evident reality.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
How is my reasoning circular?

Hoping that the teams who present the biggest obstacles for qualifying for the playoffs lose is not circular logic or reasoning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
NSJ wrote:
How is my reasoning circular?

Hoping that the teams who present the biggest obstacles for qualifying for the playoffs lose is not circular logic or reasoning.

You're right. Its not circular logic. The Reds suck. Regardless of who Cub fans should or shouldnt be rooting for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quit using circular logic. The fact is the Reds suck and its starting to show

WAR Sabo's goggles


Hey....he depends on LensCrafters

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Wasn't he the one that was caught with super balls in his bat?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Wasn't he the one that was caught with super balls in his bat?



You are correct sir.....from Wikipedia

Quote:
His final season was in Cincinnati in 1996. His homecoming did not go as well as he had hoped. In July of that season, Sabo shattered his bat which was filled with cork. As a result of the incident, Sabo received a seven-game suspension.Sabo maintains that he had never corked a bat in his life. He claimed that the bat in question belonged to another player (whom he would not name). He argued that his performance that season (3HR in 52 games) was hardly "an endorsement of the cork industry."

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
NSJ wrote:
So you let you're "weird, strange inexplicable desire to win the division" do away with any wild card considerations?

You've made it clear that Reds suck and Dusty can't produce a winner in Cincinnati. If that's true, why wouldn't you want them to beat the Phillies, a potential Cub competitor for the wildcard if the Cubs don't win the divsion?


NSJ, the team that has the potential to be the biggest threat to a post season is one within the division. i think it's probably safe to say that it's not likely to see the wild card decided in the Central. Therefore, I would consider any loss within the division to be my desired outcome. Now, were the Reds 5 games below the cubs and the cubs are 1.5 games below the Phils out of a wild card and the Reds are playing the Phils, then my rooting interests have changed due to the circumstances.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Though the pitching matchup doesn't favor the Reds tonight, it would be funny if the Reds could take 2 out of 3 after losing the first game 22-1. I don't mind seeing them lose by that margin if they end up winning the series.

The Phillies were busting up in the dugout while Reds second baseman Paul Janish gave up six runs in the 8th. A second loss to the Reds would wipe those smiles off their faces.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
NSJ wrote:
Though the pitching matchup doesn't favor the Reds tonight, it would be funny if the Reds could take 2 out of 3 after losing the first game 22-1. I don't mind seeing them lose by that margin if they end up winning the series.

The Phillies were busting up in the dugout while Reds second baseman Paul Janish gave up six runs in the 8th. A second loss to the Reds would wipe those smiles off their faces.


No one cares about your man crush on the Reds....they suck....and the town of Cincinnati really sucks.....only good thing to come out of Cincinnati???

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Phil McCracken wrote:
and the town of Cincinnati really sucks.....


:cheers:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Phil McCracken wrote:
NSJ wrote:
Though the pitching matchup doesn't favor the Reds tonight, it would be funny if the Reds could take 2 out of 3 after losing the first game 22-1. I don't mind seeing them lose by that margin if they end up winning the series.

The Phillies were busting up in the dugout while Reds second baseman Paul Janish gave up six runs in the 8th. A second loss to the Reds would wipe those smiles off their faces.


No one cares about your man crush on the Reds....they suck....and the town of Cincinnati really sucks.....only good thing to come out of Cincinnati???

Image

and...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
OK Nas, it's halfway thru the season and your man Willy Tavaras is falling WAY short of your expectations.
16 stolen bases, 40 runs scored (I believe you were predicting 100). A .288 OBP and a DREADFUL .301 SLG.
Do you still think this guy is gonna save the Reds?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Phil McCracken wrote:
NSJ wrote:
Though the pitching matchup doesn't favor the Reds tonight, it would be funny if the Reds could take 2 out of 3 after losing the first game 22-1. I don't mind seeing them lose by that margin if they end up winning the series.

The Phillies were busting up in the dugout while Reds second baseman Paul Janish gave up six runs in the 8th. A second loss to the Reds would wipe those smiles off their faces.


No one cares about your man crush on the Reds....they suck....and the town of Cincinnati really sucks.....only good thing to come out of Cincinnati???

Image


There is no more sophisticated means to construct an argument than the "You Suck" approach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
NSJ wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
NSJ wrote:
Though the pitching matchup doesn't favor the Reds tonight, it would be funny if the Reds could take 2 out of 3 after losing the first game 22-1. I don't mind seeing them lose by that margin if they end up winning the series.

The Phillies were busting up in the dugout while Reds second baseman Paul Janish gave up six runs in the 8th. A second loss to the Reds would wipe those smiles off their faces.


No one cares about your man crush on the Reds....they suck....and the town of Cincinnati really sucks.....only good thing to come out of Cincinnati???

Image


There is no more sophisticated means to construct an argument than the "You Suck" approach.


What is the point of arguing with you....We all get it the Reds are awesome....Dusty Baker is a genius. It's the same thing all the time. They are going to finish in 4th and 5th and you will be here posting excuses about what happened. Why dont you go to post some at CINCINSFMB or at least bring some critical thoughts to your posts concerning the Big Red Machine.


PS......Reds Suck.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Eric Davis was awesome though


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
I don't get this argument...the Cardinals are gonna end up winning the division anyways... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37832
Location: ...
i do believe you're right, actually, lipid. and it's interesting to me that none of these idiot pundits have taken the cards in their predictions the last few years. everybody picks the cubs or the brewers. yet which team is always in the mix, and sometimes (like in this case), peeking at the top spot? the cardinals are, i don't know, something like the patriots. they're a machine. they never have the "on paper" talent or whatever but what they're doing works.

and it drives me nuts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Hey NSJ... What are the writers out there saying about this team? Is the hometown still down with Baker or what's the consensus out there?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
He doesn't have all of his horses.

Was this a joke?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Darkside wrote:
Hey NSJ... What are the writers out there saying about this team? Is the hometown still down with Baker or what's the consensus out there?


The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, Taveras)

-He overused Cueto, Harnang and Volquez in August and September when Reds were out of it.

-They question is in-game decision making

. . . so pretty much the same criticisms that he had in Chicago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
NSJ wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hey NSJ... What are the writers out there saying about this team? Is the hometown still down with Baker or what's the consensus out there?


The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, Taveras)

-He overused Cueto, Harnang and Volquez in August and September when Reds were out of it.

-They question is in-game decision making

. . . so pretty much the same criticisms that he had in Chicago.

Wow not pretty much. Exactly. You forget the botched double switches though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
NSJ wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hey NSJ... What are the writers out there saying about this team? Is the hometown still down with Baker or what's the consensus out there?


The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, Taveras)

-He overused Cueto, Harnang and Volquez in August and September when Reds were out of it.

-They question is in-game decision making

. . . so pretty much the same criticisms that he had in Chicago.

A few name changes and it's 2004.

The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, DuBois, Hawkins)

-He overused Wood, Prior and Borowski in August and September when Cubs were out of it.

-They question is in-game decision making

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
NSJ wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hey NSJ... What are the writers out there saying about this team? Is the hometown still down with Baker or what's the consensus out there?


The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, Taveras)

-He overused Cueto, Harnang and Volquez in August and September when Reds were out of it.

-They question is in-game decision making

. . . so pretty much the same criticisms that he had in Chicago.

A few name changes and it's 2004.

The media and the fans aren't particularly pleased.

-He's stubborn when it comes to playing non-productive veterans (e.g. Corey Patterson, DuBois, Hawkins)

-He overused Wood, Prior and Borowski in August and September when Cubs were out of it.


-They question is in-game decision making


Unfortunately thats not true. Those losers were in it til 3 days left in the season. Even after Victor Diaz seemingly ended the season with a hr off Dempster...they had chance after chance that week and just blew every one of them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
rogers park bryan wrote:
Unfortunately thats not true. Those losers were in it til 3 days left in the season. Even after Victor Diaz seemingly ended the season with a hr off Dempster...they had chance after chance that week and just blew every one of them

I remember them blowing a game in New York in the last week when they could've extended their lead in the wild card. I believe Sosa hit for the golden sombrero, and that was basically the beginning of the end of that season.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Douchebag wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Unfortunately thats not true. Those losers were in it til 3 days left in the season. Even after Victor Diaz seemingly ended the season with a hr off Dempster...they had chance after chance that week and just blew every one of them

I remember them blowing a game in New York in the last week when they could've extended their lead in the wild card. I believe Sosa hit for the golden sombrero, and that was basically the beginning of the end of that season.

The sad part is that was only the beggining. The final week they kept getting breaks and failed to capitilize on them. The Lowlight was Prior going 9 Inn Striking out 16 and the Cubs losing 2-1 in 10, which brings us back to Dusty's suckitude in not believing the scouting reports and pitching to Valentin...

Fuck the 2004 Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
rogers park bryan wrote:
Fuck the 2004 Cubs.

Yes. That may be the most unlikeable and disappointing team of my liftetime.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Douchebag wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Fuck the 2004 Cubs.

Yes. That may be the most unlikeable and disappointing team of my liftetime.

2009.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Darkside wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Fuck the 2004 Cubs.

Yes. That may be the most unlikeable and disappointing team of my liftetime.

2009.

To me its not even close...2003 shot me five times in the chest...2004 Put a bomb inside my body Super Mario style and blew me the fuck up, then deposited my remains into a trash compacter...then took those remains and tossed em into a fiery inferno.

Sosa...Mercker...Wood D.L....Prior D.L....The Colonol Glendon Rusch starting meaningful games. Hawkins...Rob Mackowiak...Pujols 3 Hrs etc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Cincinnati Reds
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
Darkside wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Fuck the 2004 Cubs.

Yes. That may be the most unlikeable and disappointing team of my liftetime.

2009.

No. This current team is just bad. The moves they made did not improve the team at any position. I was pretty sure they would regress, and they have. I won't be shocked if they miss the playoffs this year, and I wouldn't be shocked if they made it in. They are not going anywhere and I have zero expectations. 2004 was just an epic fail of monumental proportions.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 413 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group