(although the Keith as the best of the Big three was retarded)...

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

So Ziehm is an idiot because he thinks Sharp is their best offensive player because he has the most points.... but it's okay for you to say Kane is their best player because he's their best OFFENSIVE player? WYC? Same logic. Ask guys who've played the game at the highest level and see what they think. Most of them I talk to favor Keith.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

Same logic? Mac you're an idiot. You don't even know what logic is. You're idea of poor logic is any argument that isn't presented in the form of a list.

Saying Sharp is the best offensive player on the team because he leads the team in points is hockey retarded. Saying that ANY player on any team is the best offensive player simply because they lead that team in points is hockey retarded.

Saying that Kane is the best player on the team is based on the logic that, based on this season, Kane IS the best player on the team.

You saying that Kane being the best offensive player on the team means he can't be the best player on the team is once again hockey retarded. It would be like someone saying that Ovechkin isn't the best guy on Washington.


If you don't recognize that Kane has been CLEARLY the best player on the ice this season then you are either not watching the games or are just a dumbfuck. Probably a little of pile A and a little of pile B.

And don't give me this shit about you talking to high level hockey people. Like you would even be able to comprehend such a conversation. The only conversation you give a shit about all day is the one you have with your bookie. Actually you probably have about 20 conversations with your bookie on a daily basis.

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

i'll pray for your recovery, shakes. usually those with the affliction are the last to recognize it, so good luck finding your way.

i'll pray for your recovery, shakes. usually those with the affliction are the last to recognize it, so good luck finding your way.

I wish Sharp could remain a Blackhawk, and Dustin also... but because John McHendry overpaid for Campbell and Hossa, some of the lunch pale guys are gonna have to be jetisoned due to salary cap issues in the coming years.

From a financial standpoint: Campbell + Hossa are to the Blackhawks what Soriano and Zambrano are to the Cubs.

Campbell yes, Hossa no. Anyone would love to have someone like Hossa and his production for only a 5.2 million cap hit.

Is there a chance they could/would get rid of Campbell?

i'll pray for your recovery, shakes. usually those with the affliction are the last to recognize it, so good luck finding your way.

i'll pray for your recovery, shakes. usually those with the affliction are the last to recognize it, so good luck finding your way.

Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .

Shit. He's good and I hope somebody takes him. To me it would be better to lose 1 good player than 3 good players. From what I can gather their depth is a large part of their success.

Actually I take that back, even Campbell is very useful, he is just over paid. But someone like him who can set up the power play and clear the blueline is going to be paid high because there are very few of them in the league. The pp has improved with him on the team.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!

I wish Sharp could remain a Blackhawk, and Dustin also... but because John McHendry overpaid for Campbell and Hossa, some of the lunch pale guys are gonna have to be jetisoned due to salary cap issues in the coming years.

From a financial standpoint: Campbell + Hossa are to the Blackhawks what Soriano and Zambrano are to the Cubs.

Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!