It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
Antonio Pierce was released by the Giants today. What if the Bears were to sign him and dangle Urlacher in some trade bait? :idea:

Apparently Pierce had a not so great year in '09, but maybe he can return to his pro bowl self.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=A ... &type=lgns

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I don't think it would be smart to trade Urlacher now. You won't get better than a 3rd or 4th round pick. Urlacher is worth more than that to the Bears.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:03 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:13 pm
Posts: 2584
Huh? The Bears already have Urlacher, and if need be Briggs.

It kinda went under the radar that Pisa is comin' back next year also.

Much like Urlacher, Pierce's best days are behind him, so why pay any up front bonus for a non-Cover2 linebacker?

_________________
Disclaimer: Most of my posts are not suitable for work or home viewing.

The name's Rockmore. Beef Rockmore


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
Just thinking of someone they could dangle for trade with a decent WR. Although after some thought, there are a bunch of free agent receivers available.

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
pierce = done. he was playing like shit before he got hurt. he is a leader-type, but his best days on the field are behind him for sure.

if you have a weapon you need to hide from the cops, or you need an iron-clad alibi, he probably wouldn't be your first choice either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 1073
Urlacher is better than Pierce, especially in the system the Bears run. And getting Piso back is big if he stays healthy, he is very underrated IMHO>

_________________
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
there is different kinds of smart..book/street .


the victory cry of low achievers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You clearly watch too many NFC East games, Jeff :P

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
The Bears are pretty stacked at LB - Urlacher, Briggs and Tinoisamoa are the starters (Tinoisamoa will be in a battle), and Hillenmeyer, Roach and Tim Shaw fill out the roster. Everything I read says no Jamar Williams for next season already and the backups have to be on special teams so a guy like Pierce, coming off back surgury, is not likely to end up here, and, in a way, Tinoisamoa is our version of Pierce.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BD wrote:
The Bears are pretty stacked at LB - Urlacher, Briggs and Tinoisamoa are the starters (Tinoisamoa will be in a battle), and Hillenmeyer, Roach and Tim Shaw fill out the roster. Everything I read says no Jamar Williams for next season already and the backups have to be on special teams so a guy like Pierce, coming off back surgury, is not likely to end up here, and, in a way, Tinoisamoa is our version of Pierce.


I'd hardly call the Bears "stacked" at linebacker. While Briggs is very good, Urlacher is clearly on the decline, and Tinoisamoa may be as well. Hillenmeyer, Roach and Shaw are just a bunch of guys.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Shaw is a guy you need to have on special teams. He was a monster last year.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Tall Midget wrote:
BD wrote:
The Bears are pretty stacked at LB - Urlacher, Briggs and Tinoisamoa are the starters (Tinoisamoa will be in a battle), and Hillenmeyer, Roach and Tim Shaw fill out the roster. Everything I read says no Jamar Williams for next season already and the backups have to be on special teams so a guy like Pierce, coming off back surgury, is not likely to end up here, and, in a way, Tinoisamoa is our version of Pierce.


I'd hardly call the Bears "stacked" at linebacker. While Briggs is very good, Urlacher is clearly on the decline, and Tinoisamoa may be as well. Hillenmeyer, Roach and Shaw are just a bunch of guys.


I think this is one position where they have at least one Pro Bowl player, maybe another if Urlacher can return at a high level, and while the other spot will be filled by stop gap players, how many teams in the league have a guy as good as Briggs, and then a 2nd guy like Urlacher?

Shaw had a very good season on special teams, and while I agree with you that Tinoisamoa, Hillenmeyer, and Roach are just guys, they at least have plenty of experience at the position and provide depth.

It's just not a position that I'm very concerned about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Can Urlacher stay healthy? I think he'll be done by week four.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
LB's are the easiest position to find these days. Every team has younger, cheaper, athletic guys coming up.

Just ebcause we dont have an up n coming star does not represent the league. Look at Nick Roach and Jamar Williams. Both did show enough for Angelo to focus elsewhere, even though I think they both suck. They are guys who have great games v bad teams.

If either was good enough, Piso would not have a job.

This team needs so much more than LB's

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group