It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
HOVA wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I would ake Chester Taylor over LT but the cost of each is quite different. LT is bargain bin, and he gives more than Kevin Jones, our Adrian Peterson, and Garrett Wolfe. Even in 01.


Call me crazy but I would be willing to give Jones another shot. He knows the offense too. I just feel Chester will want to be paid as a starter. IMO that money would be better spent somewhere else. A healthy Forte should make a difference too.


OK, you're crazy. Jones had a few good years long ago in the comfort of an indoor arena in Detroit. He will likely never get back the burst he once had. With questionable knees and joints he's not likely to withstand the punishment a Bears back has to take. 6-10 touches per game would seem to be optimistic. He's an injury waiting to happen & even if healthy, I don't think he realistically has anything left.

As to his knowing the offense, I'd wonder about that as well. He had one year w/Martz in an offense dominated by Roy Williams and Mike Furrey, both of whom were better than the Bears' best.

Forte is exceedingly average to above average at best. His best attribute, if he stays healthy will be a modest cap number, but that's about it IMO.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
When I really think about it this type of offense may be perfect for LT because he wouldn't have to run the ball as much. I would be open to it if it made sense but he wouldn't be a guy I would target.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Irish Boy wrote:
Pro football reference did a write-up on Smith not too long ago that said the O-line argument is oversold. They made a convincing case on Smith's behalf. I'll link if I find the time later.


Pro Football Reference is wrong in this regard. There were all pros at every line position incl. TE (IIRC) during Emmitt's glory years. Factor in a very good blocking back, WRs who legitimately could block in a very diverse offense, it was tailor made for any good, durable running back to gain 10-12K yards.

And since Thurman Thomas was mentioned, I'd include him in the list of RBs I have more respect for. (edit: than Emmitt)

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
HOVA wrote:
When I really think about it this type of offense may be perfect for LT because he wouldn't have to run the ball as much. I would be open to it if it made sense but he wouldn't be a guy I would target.


LT in the Bears' offense(and with this lack of talent, anywhere) is an open invitation to eight in the box defenses. He cannot run with power and on the off chance he actually bounces off a tackler (on a clean track), his lack of evasive ability has made the bull's eye on his back larger and clearer than ever.

It's too bad (for him) that Cincinnati has already stocked up on retreads, he'd be perfect there (or alternatively somewhere wide open like N. Orleans)

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Regular Reader wrote:
HOVA wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I would ake Chester Taylor over LT but the cost of each is quite different. LT is bargain bin, and he gives more than Kevin Jones, our Adrian Peterson, and Garrett Wolfe. Even in 01.


Call me crazy but I would be willing to give Jones another shot. He knows the offense too. I just feel Chester will want to be paid as a starter. IMO that money would be better spent somewhere else. A healthy Forte should make a difference too.


OK, you're crazy. Jones had a few good years long ago in the comfort of an indoor arena in Detroit. He will likely never get back the burst he once had. With questionable knees and joints he's not likely to withstand the punishment a Bears back has to take. 6-10 touches per game would seem to be optimistic. He's an injury waiting to happen & even if healthy, I don't think he realistically has anything left.

As to his knowing the offense, I'd wonder about that as well. He had one year w/Martz in an offense dominated by Roy Williams and Mike Furrey, both of whom were better than the Bears' best.

Forte is exceedingly average to above average at best. His best attribute, if he stays healthy will be a modest cap number, but that's about it IMO.


That's fair. I really don't have anything to go off of but a gut feeling.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
HOVA wrote:
That's fair. I really don't have anything to go off of but a gut feeling.


Understandable. I'd always thought of Kevin Jones as a solid pro (latter days in Detroit aside), with more talent than Forte at his best.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
If the Oline gets better at run blocking, then Matt Forte does better than last year. LT behind the same Oline that the Bears had last year does not a whole hellava lot more than Forte.

Torry Holt, LT, Orlando Pace...jeez. Is Trent Green available?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I'm more interested in Flipper Anderson.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Regular Reader wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Pro football reference did a write-up on Smith not too long ago that said the O-line argument is oversold. They made a convincing case on Smith's behalf. I'll link if I find the time later.


Pro Football Reference is wrong in this regard. There were all pros at every line position incl. TE (IIRC) during Emmitt's glory years. Factor in a very good blocking back, WRs who legitimately could block in a very diverse offense, it was tailor made for any good, durable running back to gain 10-12K yards.

And since Thurman Thomas was mentioned, I'd include him in the list of RBs I have more respect for. (edit: than Emmitt)


I wonder why no one ever holds this against Terrell Davis

He was completely surrounded by Pro Bowlers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Pro football reference did a write-up on Smith not too long ago that said the O-line argument is oversold. They made a convincing case on Smith's behalf. I'll link if I find the time later.


Pro Football Reference is wrong in this regard. There were all pros at every line position incl. TE (IIRC) during Emmitt's glory years. Factor in a very good blocking back, WRs who legitimately could block in a very diverse offense, it was tailor made for any good, durable running back to gain 10-12K yards.

And since Thurman Thomas was mentioned, I'd include him in the list of RBs I have more respect for. (edit: than Emmitt)


I wonder why no one ever holds this against Terrell Davis

He was completely surrounded by Pro Bowlers.


Because it was the common wisdom that TD put that team on his back, made everyone else around him better....rejuvenated Elway, unlike Emmitt (fair or not)

Besides, to the naked eye of most, TD was a better runner/running back

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
I don't think the Bears want to bring in a RB who will challenge Forte or make him look bad. The Bears protect their draft picks to a fault. Personally, I would like to see the Bears sign Chester Taylor. He's a better RB than Forte so it will probably not happen.
I still don't understand what they ever saw in Kevin Jones...or Garrett Wolfe for that matter.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
Because it was the common wisdom that TD put that team on his back, made everyone else around him better....rejuvenated Elway, unlike Emmitt (fair or not)

The 93 Cowboys team went 0-2 without Emmitt Smith, 16-1 with him, and the one loss was the Leon Lett game.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Irish Boy wrote:
Quote:
Because it was the common wisdom that TD put that team on his back, made everyone else around him better....rejuvenated Elway, unlike Emmitt (fair or not)

The 93 Cowboys team went 0-2 without Emmitt Smith, 16-1 with him, and the one loss was the Leon Lett game.


Lets not get all revisionist here. While the record is undeniable, the distraction Jerry Jones caused was bigger than just Emmitt or his absence. That TEAM could do nothing right during training camp and the first few weeks that season. Those (to borrow from Jerry Krause) were organizational losses as strange as it sounds.

It was such an organizational fuck up it also ultimately led to Jimmy Johnson's leaving after that season. Not that there was anything wrong with that :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

I wonder why no one ever holds this against Terrell Davis

He was completely surrounded by Pro Bowlers.


Because it was the common wisdom that TD put that team on his back, made everyone else around him better....rejuvenated Elway, unlike Emmitt (fair or not)

Besides, to the naked eye of most, TD was a better runner/running back

Yeah, that seems a little overstated. Everyone says TD rejuvenated Elway.

He had 3 pro bowl offenseive lineman, John Fucking Elway, Shannon Sharpe, Howard Griffith and McCaffrey and Smith.

Pretty nice setup


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
And a great coach :wink:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yeah, that seems a little overstated. Everyone says TD rejuvenated Elway.

He had 3 pro bowl offensive lineman, John Fucking Elway, Shannon Sharpe, Howard Griffith and McCaffrey and Smith.

Pretty nice setup


Again, fair or not as "America's Team" everyone knew everyone on Dallas, they all were overwhelming favorites for the pro bowl. Conversely, at the time Elway was tabbed a loser, Denver's O line had a standing moratorium on interviews, Rod Smith was a just a rookie/2nd yr. guy, McCaffery & Griffith were not tabbed as "special" and Sharpe was reviled as a loudmouth.

(Yeah, I know Irvin was a loudmouth, but he was the team leader/first arrival in Dallas)

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Regular Reader wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Yeah, that seems a little overstated. Everyone says TD rejuvenated Elway.

He had 3 pro bowl offensive lineman, John Fucking Elway, Shannon Sharpe, Howard Griffith and McCaffrey and Smith.

Pretty nice setup


Again, fair or not as "America's Team" everyone knew everyone on Dallas, they all were overwhelming favorites for the pro bowl. Conversely, at the time Elway was tabbed a loser, Denver's O line had a standing moratorium on interviews, Rod Smith was a just a rookie/2nd yr. guy, McCaffery & Griffith were not tabbed as "special" and Sharpe was reviled as a loudmouth.

(Yeah, I know Irvin was a loudmouth, but he was the team leader/first arrival in Dallas)

3 offensive lineman, Elway, Sharpe, and McCaffrey all went to the Pro Bowl.

And if there's one thing the CSFMB has taught me its: A Pro Bowl appearance= Legend


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37835
Location: ...
HOVA wrote:
LT is a borderline top 5 running back of all time IMO.


heh. yeah...ok.

Regular Reader wrote:
Lets not get all revisionist here. While the record is undeniable, the distraction Jerry Jones caused was bigger than just Emmitt or his absence. That TEAM could do nothing right during training camp and the first few weeks that season. Those (to borrow from Jerry Krause) were organizational losses as strange as it sounds.


IB was only 2 years old in '93 so i don't think he really knows about that team anyway. :P

to go back in time and try to find what running backs belonged to what offensive lines to see how "great" they really were would just take too long.

but i agree that emmitt did benefit from some great o-lines. actually you kinda have to. unless you ARE barry sanders, the holes in the defense have to open up, otherwise there's nowhere else to go.

LT better than emmitt?

Post Season LT wrote:

OUCH coach, I just can't play right now...I'm sorry.


psh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:06 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
W_Z wrote:
IB was only 2 years old in '93 so i don't think he really knows about that team anyway. :P


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
emmitt is clearly a top-five RB. on top of being a great runner, he was tough as nails and played through some hard-core injuries. i remember him playing one stretch with a dislocated shoulder where he had his bum arm strapped to his side so he could hardly lift it, but he still was running wild.

i know there is a lot of sentiment that he got the rushing record simply due to longevity, not due greatness as a runner, but i think that is crazy. he was a GREAT runner during that super bowl stretch, i dont care what line he was behind. yeah, he hung on for a while at the end, but im not gonna hold that against him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
W_Z wrote:
HOVA wrote:
LT is a borderline top 5 running back of all time IMO.


heh. yeah...ok.

Regular Reader wrote:
Lets not get all revisionist here. While the record is undeniable, the distraction Jerry Jones caused was bigger than just Emmitt or his absence. That TEAM could do nothing right during training camp and the first few weeks that season. Those (to borrow from Jerry Krause) were organizational losses as strange as it sounds.


IB was only 2 years old in '93 so i don't think he really knows about that team anyway. :P

to go back in time and try to find what running backs belonged to what offensive lines to see how "great" they really were would just take too long.

but i agree that emmitt did benefit from some great o-lines. actually you kinda have to. unless you ARE barry sanders, the holes in the defense have to open up, otherwise there's nowhere else to go.

LT better than emmitt?

Post Season LT wrote:

OUCH coach, I just can't play right now...I'm sorry.


psh.


YOU'RE HIGH! Emmitt couldn't hold LT's jockstrap.

Looks like I hit a HR with my Thurman Thomas comparison.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... itEm00.htm

They compare LT to Barry.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... mlLa00.htm

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
HOVA wrote:
W_Z wrote:
HOVA wrote:
LT is a borderline top 5 running back of all time IMO.


heh. yeah...ok.

Regular Reader wrote:
Lets not get all revisionist here. While the record is undeniable, the distraction Jerry Jones caused was bigger than just Emmitt or his absence. That TEAM could do nothing right during training camp and the first few weeks that season. Those (to borrow from Jerry Krause) were organizational losses as strange as it sounds.


IB was only 2 years old in '93 so i don't think he really knows about that team anyway. :P

to go back in time and try to find what running backs belonged to what offensive lines to see how "great" they really were would just take too long.

but i agree that emmitt did benefit from some great o-lines. actually you kinda have to. unless you ARE barry sanders, the holes in the defense have to open up, otherwise there's nowhere else to go.

LT better than emmitt?

Post Season LT wrote:

OUCH coach, I just can't play right now...I'm sorry.


psh.


YOU'RE HIGH! Emmitt couldn't hold LT's jockstrap.

Looks like I hit a HR with my Thurman Thomas comparison.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... itEm00.htm

They compare LT to Barry.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/p ... mlLa00.htm


LT isn't even in the team photo with Emmitt Smith. Smith was the better back, better teammate, & had a better career & won championships.
However, if we are going to say that Emmitt benefited greatly from playing behind some great Offensive lines, doesn't that logic then elevate Walters RB status since he played behind garbage lines?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Walter is in my top 5 but Emmitt isn't. Barry Sanders is #1.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
The top 4 RB's are easy for me, but I can't get the 5th. Hard to believe that Martin & Bettis are 4th & 5th in all time rushing yards.

Walter
Barry
Emmitt
Jim
?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Barry Sanders
Jim Brown
Walter Payton
Marshall Faulk
Earl Campbell/LT

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
:lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Scorehead wrote:
The top 4 RB's are easy for me, but I can't get the 5th. Hard to believe that Martin & Bettis are 4th & 5th in all time rushing yards.

Walter
Barry
Emmitt
Jim
?

Emmitt in front of Jim Brown huh?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Jim Brown could easily be #1 on any list.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
i like earl campbell as much as the next guy (i actually agree that during his prime he was indeed great), but top 5 all-time seems pushing it for a guy who only had 5 seasons where he carried the ball 300 times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Tomlinson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
LT and Faulk don't belong in the all time best 5 either.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group