1. I was right about Grossman. He will continue to make the mistakes that will cost the Bears a Championship.

2. Benson was right about himself. He again demonstrated he should be getting more carries. Also, Jones again showed that the pass-blocking excuse is just that: an excuse. Benson was right right to be upset with his situation, even if he was foolish to air that out on the MJH show.

3. Angelo was right to draft Hester. Damn that guy is the shit!

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

Burrito.

Yeah you are.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

You're right, which is something you publicly strive for. Your message board award is in the mail.

As I said in the marathon thread, Matt can only be proven right. If Rex had an awsome game, he would have said it didn't count because the Vikes suck. The same could be said for the remaining opponents.

If Rex has a bad game, then he feels vidicated....which he obviously does.

_________________

Of course. Stick around, and you'll find that's the rule.


As opposed to what? Trolling people's threads? Sorry, massa.


My balls, your chin, buddy.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

Not at all. Look at the Salisbury and Rosenbloom forum, where you can see how I despise the excuse that so-and-so only performed well because the other team was injured, or because the other team sucks. That's nonsense. My reasons for doubting Grossman stem from the fact that his completion percentage sucks, he throws interceptions with regularity, and he has yet to have a 300+ yard game, even when the offense is "clicking." I was reading the Bears v. Vikings thread earlier this week, and several people were saying that Rex would have a bounce-back game; I was genuininely hoping that would be the case. But it wasn't. I was right; Rex will sink this ship.

The crickets that take place of a reply to my Benson comments are telling. I guess the shit-talkers that were out in force after the MJH interview are nowhere to be found, suddenly. The anti-Hester shit talkers are also mysteriously silent.

The sooner you realize I'm right, the less of a fool you'll make yourself.


Not at all. I feel sick to my stomach. Prior to the season, I wanted Griese to start; after the first 5 games, I was more than happy (elated, in fact) to say I was wrong; I remember discussing that "we're sorry Rex" sign that was at one of those games, and saying how perfectly that summed up my position. Sadly, it turns out I wasn't wrong, and Rex has regressed continually ever since, culminating in today's ultimate exhibition in QB futility (have you ever witnessed a sub 5 QB rating for an entire game? I haven't.). Vindicated? Hardly. I had SB hopes for this team, and they're all but dead. It's like Bartman all over again.

Worst of all, it makes Salisbury's "I'd trade Grossman for Romo in a hearbeat" comment rational. Vindicated? Please.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

The irony is staggering.

Oh, do explain.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

This thread is egotarded.

_________________
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

http://www.TheCommittedIndian.com/

Another troll post. Weak.

Actually, I started this thread half tounge-in-cheek; the idea was to connect several otherwise unrelated stories surrounding the beloved. Interestingly, it's led to several board members displaying their mettle. I guess when you can't make a case to the contrary, it's best to simply say "burrito" or claim this thread is "egotarded." Sorta speaks to the quality of the would-be opposition. Disappointing.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

i agree.


and someone is hardly a troll when they're approaching 1000 posts..

_________________

There really isn't even anything to oppose. I'm not quite sure even HOW to oppose views that are simply posted by the author so that he can feel good about actually SEEING his thoughts on a public message board while he desperately tries to prove something to.... someone... for some reason or another by tying in "unrelated stories". They're unrelated, keep them that way, nobody cares.

The fact that someone has the gall to infer that they are "usually right" and then to invite members to "stick around", even after apparently COMPLETELY disregarding the number of posts the invitees have in comparison to the apparent Pissing Party host, simply shows how uninformed and immature a person can be in a faceless medium like a message board. So, if this means that the opposition is lacking in quality, then I'll take it for what it is worth and consider the comment's source.

just trolling here guys.......nothing to contribute....

_________________
@audioidkid

Maybe Matt was referring more to my complexion than my lack of posting. If that's the case, then I understand completely.

_________________
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

http://www.TheCommittedIndian.com/

How do you figure? You can troll a thread regardless of how many posts you have, as Stinkfinger proved.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

so...by your definition. every poster is a troll.

_________________
@audioidkid

That's right

Crown Point sucks! Only tornados like going through there.

You should have stopped here. It would have been more honest.


Feel good? Dude, we all post here for one reason: to read other fans' thoughts, and to post our own thoughts for our entertainment. Well, that's not quite true: you post to troll other people.


You're projecting. I'm not trying to prove anything. Keep your nickel psychoanalysis to yourself.


You did, as evidenced by your need to troll this thread.


Wait, wait. So, your argument is that a higher number of posts somehow makes you more apt to be correct? Is that what you're saying?

By the way, Einstein: wasn't your original claim that my post was ironic? Seems your this board's resident Alanis Morisette, and are unaware of the meaning of the word.


Not sure what this being a faceless medium has to do with anything. Was this an attempt to tough-talk me? If so, that would be ironic, champ.

In fact, it's downright ironic that you accuse me of being immature when your initial reply to the thread was "burrito." That's just about as immature as it gets. Tell you what: you just keep posting, and I'll keep pointing out the ironic nature of your posts; I'm confident that, eventually, I can teach you the meaning of the word.


No, it means there is no opposition. Trolling does not constitute an argument. I'm not surprised you were unable to grasp that simple point. If you disagree, fine; I was just posting my thoughts. If you don't have anything to say, don't say anything at all. If you troll me, be prepared to have it pointed out.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

"Police - Troll"

_________________
@audioidkid

How do you figure? I'm not saying stinkfinger is a troll, anyways; I'm saying he trolled my thread. Any poster is capable of trolling a thread, regardless of the number of posts. That's a simple fact of reality. It in no way means that any poster is or isn't a troll. Not sure where the confusion arose here.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

Blah, Blah, Blah

That was perposesable

LOL, way to prove my point.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?

Pretty much sums it up right there. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go find more nickels to buy the rights to practice psychoanalysis on my patients (which is something I do everyday IRL). Oh, and possibly a few dimes here and there to buy a dictionary so I can learn what "irony" is... even though I could just go on dictionary.com. Hmmm.... there must be a word for that paradox....

Crown boy is retarded

I'm starting to lean towards "god complex"

Yep, I caught you making a fool of yourself yet again, and again, you can't think of a way out of it.


Oh, I'm sure. All Psychologists troll internet boards and use the term "burrito."


You certainly could, but you obviously didn't before using the word.


I'll save you the trouble this time: paradox.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?