It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:29 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Bagels-I don't anticipate the Twins winning at the rate they have in their last 10 games (.800) or over the past 41 games (.731) thats unrealistic. Thats why the numbers I use to estimate their final win total has always been their entire season to date. I think thats the most fair way to estimate. However, it would not be unreasonable to believe they may well exceed my estimated win total in light of their record since the All-Star break being far better than prior to the break. But my estimates were always based upon the whole season to date, and no "hot streak" was ever factored into it.


But....a hot streak *is* factored into it, i.e. the one they're currently on. That has raised their overall win %, correct?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Fouts wrote:
Guys, this is my kind of baseball series. Two teams, one home and one away, both with managers and starting pitching going at it. Both of these teams have a DH and some outfielders. Fellas, I'll tell ya, I think the team that scores the most runs has a real good chance at winning this series.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well, that certainly puts a different spin on things. It looks like the more games they win the better.

Also, Twins losses are good.


If there is a playoff...its a best of 1 series.

Whoever wins that first and only game, will have a leg up in this race. They will have a 1.000 Winning pct in 2010 playin games, while the other team will have a .000 Winning Pct.

Taking those numbers to the lab, it looks like the 1.000 pct team would win that game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Bagels wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Bagels-I don't anticipate the Twins winning at the rate they have in their last 10 games (.800) or over the past 41 games (.731) thats unrealistic. Thats why the numbers I use to estimate their final win total has always been their entire season to date. I think thats the most fair way to estimate. However, it would not be unreasonable to believe they may well exceed my estimated win total in light of their record since the All-Star break being far better than prior to the break. But my estimates were always based upon the whole season to date, and no "hot streak" was ever factored into it.


But....a hot streak *is* factored into it, i.e. the one they're currently on. That has raised their overall win %, correct?



Since every game (whether part of a hot streak or a losing streak) is a part of the season...yes. But no more than any other game played in April or May.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:32 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Steve is working feverishly in his lab...

Image

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Steve, you're starting with the premise that this Twins team playing under .500 over a 24 game stretch would represent some kind of epic and historical collapse. In reality it would just be a bad 24 game run and the Twins have had those this season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well, that certainly puts a different spin on things. It looks like the more games they win the better.

Also, Twins losses are good.


If there is a playoff...its a best of 1 series.

Whoever wins that first and only game, will have a leg up in this race. They will have a 1.000 Winning pct in 2010 playin games, while the other team will have a .000 Winning Pct.

Taking those numbers to the lab, it looks like the 1.000 pct team would win that game.
That would be nice. I've got to admit though. If both teams play to the statistical averages for the rest of the season, I don't think the Sox will make the playoffs.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, Twins losses are good.


If there is a playoff...its a best of 1 series.

Whoever wins that first and only game, will have a leg up in this race. They will have a 1.000 Winning pct in 2010 playin games, while the other team will have a .000 Winning Pct.

Taking those numbers to the lab, it looks like the 1.000 pct team would win that game.
That would be nice. I've got to admit though. If both teams play to the statistical averages for the rest of the season, I don't think the Sox will make the playoffs.

The biggest obstacle I see after pouring over these numbers is the Twins currently having more wins.

Although, thats an opinion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Steve, you're starting with the premise that this Twins team playing under .500 over a 24 game stretch would represent some kind of epic and historical collapse. In reality it would just be a bad 24 game run and the Twins have had those this season.


I don't think it would represent an "epic collapse" for the Twins to lose more than they win in their final 24 games. However, I don't find it to be likely. If a team has won 13 of their last 15 series' and tied another, so as to have lost just 1 series.... for them to be expected to suddenly lose more than half of their remaining 8 series, is against the odds for sure. For a team that has won 30/41 to suddenly lose more than they win of the final 24 games...unlikely. Plus, the Twins are getting guys healthy again and that just makes the team stronger and more likely to win. I'm not saying it's impossible and teams have come back in far more dramatic fashion than would be required here. But I just don't see the Twins cooperating in such a scenario. Plus, I don't see the Sox continuing to win as they have of late (8/10) either. But at least it's been kept interesting and entertaining...

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
No way in hell the Twins keep playing like they are. Also, who could imagine that the Sox would go win 7 straight on the road.

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
When 3.5 games seperate two teams and there's more than 4 games remaining, ain't nothing over man. And we've seen that time and time again in history so that means it is absolutely possible that it can happen. Putting the team in their coffin before they're dead could be a big fucking mistake.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
The biggest obstacle I see after pouring over these numbers is the Twins currently having more wins.
That's true. In hindsight, when the Twins beat the Sox in two series within about two weeks of each other, they really helped the total wins while hurting the total wins of the White Sox. If the Sox had won those two series, we may be looking at a completely different scenario. The Twins would have less wins and the White Sox would have more wins and as has become clear recently, the more wins you have, the more likely you are to have more wins than another team.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That's true. In hindsight, when the Twins beat the Sox in two series within about two weeks of each other, they really helped the total wins while hurting the total wins of the White Sox. If the Sox had won those two series, we may be looking at a completely different scenario. The Twins would have less wins and the White Sox would have more wins and as has become clear recently, the more wins you have, the more likely you are to have more wins than another team.

This sounds like something that would come out of the mouth of Joe Morgan.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Twins went 12-15 in June of 2010 A.D.


Thats 27 games. They won 3 less than they lost.


Thats a .444 winning pct

.500 > .444


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
No way in hell the Twins keep playing like they are. Also, who could imagine that the Sox would go win 7 straight on the road.


Last season the Twins won 16 of their last 20 games.

Currently the Twins have won 30/41

The Twins seem to be a team that plays it's best down the stretch. What makes you believe that will NOT happen the rest of this season???

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Twins went 12-15 in June of 2010 A.D.


Thats 27 games. They won 3 less than they lost.


Thats a .444 winning pct

.500 > .444


Holy shit! If the Twins play .444 from here on out, the Sox are actually the favorites.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
No way in hell the Twins keep playing like they are. Also, who could imagine that the Sox would go win 7 straight on the road.


Last season the Twins won 16 of their last 20 games.

Currently the Twins have won 30/41

The Twins seem to be a team that plays it's best down the stretch. What makes you believe that will NOT happen the rest of this season???


Because one season is not comparable to the next?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Bagels wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Twins seem to be a team that plays it's best down the stretch. What makes you believe that will NOT happen the rest of this season???


Because one season is not comparable to the next?

Because the Twins played home games indoors last season.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Bagels wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
No way in hell the Twins keep playing like they are. Also, who could imagine that the Sox would go win 7 straight on the road.


Last season the Twins won 16 of their last 20 games.

Currently the Twins have won 30/41

The Twins seem to be a team that plays it's best down the stretch. What makes you believe that will NOT happen the rest of this season???


Because one season is not comparable to the next?


That can address the 16/20 they won down the stretch in 2009. How about the 30 they have won in their last 41? How about going 13-1-1 in their last 15 series"?

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Twins went 12-15 in June of 2010 A.D.


Thats 27 games. They won 3 less than they lost.


Thats a .444 winning pct

.500 > .444


Yeah, they played poorly that month. They have played fantastic of late (30/ 41) . To expect either to be the way they play the remainder of the season, is probably not realistic. To use their winning % established for the ENTIRE season to date, is a lot more likely to be a more fair/accurate way to determine their final record.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
That can address the 16/20 they won down the stretch in 2009. How about the 30 they have won in their last 41? How about going 13-1-1 in their last 15 series"?


i address that as- they're on a hot streak that is above their winning percentage so far, and thus is not likely to continue. 16/20 down the stretch in 2009 has absolutely nothing to do with September of 2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Because the Twins played home games indoors last season.



So far this season, the Twins are a better team at home in Target Field than they were in the old dome:

Twins home record:

2010: 46-23 .667
2009: 49-33 .598

I recall an article last year which debunked the Twins having a home field advantage in the Metrodome vs league average home field advantage. Looks like they are getting the 1st season in a new stadium bump, however.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
If you're tuning into the game tonight on WCIU 26 The U at 6p, you'll notice a familiar face in the booth with Steve Stone. He's Tom Paciorek, who sat in earlier this season with Ed Farmer while Darrin Jackson was away on 670 The SCORE & the TOYOTA Chicago White Sox Radio Network. Apparently, there are family issues with Ken Harrelson, and will likely miss the rest of this series in Detroit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The Sox have their work cut out for them tonight, with Verlander going tonight in Detroit vs Garcia. Freddy Garcia has been bothered by a sore back of late and his velocity was down in his last few starts. He's 11-5 on the season, but his ERA is a bloated 4.82. He has done pretty well in his 4 starts vs Detroit, going 2-0 with a 4.01 ERA. However, now with the back problems...
Verlander is 14-8 on the season and has an ERA of 3.61. His record in home games is 9-3, with a sparkling 2.63 ERA.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Joe, You are the same guy that said the Twins wouldn't win 93 games recently. I pointed out then, that my projections were based on a simple extrapolation of the Twins record on the season. Thats being CONSERVATIVE.


And I still don't think they will. Extrapolating their current record when they've played .580 baseball is hardly "conservative". But I know you're a Cub fan. I'm sure every time they start a year 1-0 you extrapolate them to an undefeated season.


You present the argument as if Steve is extrapolating based on a 1-0 record but he's not..he's extrapolating based on a season that is 90% finished. I think that's a far greater set of data and your comparison is a bit unfair. I think based on this many games, if they're played .580 baseball it's reasonable to expect that they'll continue to do so.


He wasn't. He based his math off their current run. Noway in hell is that conservative.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Merrionette Park
pizza_Place: Nick&Vito's
SHARK wrote:
If you're tuning into the game tonight on WCIU 26 The U at 6p, you'll notice a familiar face in the booth with Steve Stone. He's Tom Paciorek, who sat in earlier this season with Ed Farmer while Darrin Jackson was away on 670 The SCORE & the TOYOTA Chicago White Sox Radio Network. Apparently, there are family issues with Ken Harrelson, and will likely miss the rest of this series in Detroit.


His problem is dead brother in-law. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Next time I will read the rest of the thread before posting.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
The Sox have their work cut out for them tonight, with Verlander going tonight in Detroit ..... Verlander is 14-8 on the season and has an ERA of 3.61. His record in home games is 9-3, with a sparkling 2.63 ERA.


Verlander career vs Sox
5-9, 4.87 ERA
1.28 WHIP
19HR allowed
http://www.baseball-reference.com/play- ... |pitch|IP|



Also, the Sox are an MLB best 53-27 since June 9.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
^^ Some interesting numbers there. I was going to post that memory serves that the Sock has lit up Verlander a few times in the past.

Freddy is kind of scary right now, he's had some gutty performances in his wins, but usually you can tell pretty early when he's gonna get rocked. I would think everyone in the pen would be available outside of Sale.

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhiteSox @ Tigers
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
HOVA wrote:
Bagels wrote:


You present the argument as if Steve is extrapolating based on a 1-0 record but he's not..he's extrapolating based on a season that is 90% finished. I think that's a far greater set of data and your comparison is a bit unfair. I think based on this many games, if they're played .580 baseball it's reasonable to expect that they'll continue to do so.


He wasn't. He based his math off their current run. Noway in hell is that conservative.



Bullshit. You don't know what you're talking about. The numbers have ALWAYS been determined by extrapolating the winning percentage accumulated over the entire season to date. That percentage now stands at .587 if you figure that percentage over 162 games, it comes out to 95.094 . The number does change as the season goes on and the winning percentage changes, however at no time did the Twins record since the All-Star break/ their last 10 games (8-2) /or last 41 games (30-11) figure more prominently into the equation. I always used the entire season to date, with no game meaning more than another. . It was always a figure drawn from the extrapolation of the entire seasonal record to date. A loss in April means as much as a win during the current winning streak.

Try again...

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group