America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The Packers are not down. If Rodgers is healthy they are a 12 win team and on the short list of SB contenders.
They will go as far as Rodgers can take them.
Of course, that's every team with an all time great QB in his prime.
But you guys are all sleeping pretty hard on the rest of the team. They're bringing back one of the best offensive lines in football, they have good pass rushers who are neither old nor particularly injury prone. They have good safeties. As you said they invested a lot in their CB spot but I agree it doesn't excite me much what they have there still. Their LB corp is a weakness unless one of their draftees stands out. Davante Adams is better than Allen Robinson and every other WR in the division not named Stephon Diggs. Their RB committee is extremely talented. They replaced one of the worst defensive coordinators in the league with a well respected one.
Thinking this team sucks outside of Rodgers seems a little out of town stupid to me.
Their pass rushers suck. They are banking on a Wilkerson return-to-form because while Daniels is obviously a great player he's not great at getting to the QB. Other than that its still Nick Perry and Clay Matthews. They've got a really good defensive line and a probably average-to-above-average secondary. What that means to me is they have a defense that will not lose them games (like it did under Capers) but wont win them games either.
I am not anywhere near as high on the offense as you are. They've clearly improved their tight end position, nothing could be worse than what Bennett gave them last year, but they seem to have taken the approach of just throwing a bunch of WR's into camp and seeing what Rodgers can make out of them (this feeds my sentiment that this Packers team will go entirely as Rodgers goes). They have a good offensive line, wont say they are any better than that until/unless Bulaga shows he's fully recoevered from his injury.
It all depends what you think of Rodgers. If you Rodgers is still in his prime you think the Packers will be good. I can certainly tell you that they are not good enough to weather losing Rodgers for 5 or so weeks. They are also not good enough to overcome Rodgers losing a step. Like I said, the possibility that Rodgers goes supernova and blows out all our expectations for the Packers is out there...but as I compile a list of possible Rodgers outcomes and assigning them probability off what I've seen from Rodgers recently I feel pessimistic about the Packers chances.
Yeah I don't know where you are getting almost any of that from. Rodgers played in 54 out of 54 possible games between collar bone injuries, and collarbone injuries are not chronic like knee and back injuries are. He literally has shown zero evidence he is declining or breaking down. There's just nothing there to be pessimistic about.
You'll see by December how badly you are underestimating Adams star potential. He is awesome. Montgomery is perfectly suited for the new pass catching back position, and Jones and Williams are hammers and Jones has shown three down back skills. Add that to a great line and a top 2 QB and you have a great offense. I agree the defense overall should be middle of the pack and that should be good enough to get them to 11-12 wins.
I think the love for Minnesota is misguided as well. Cousins is nowhere near a top tier QB and routinely shits the bed in basically every big game he's ever played in. He's accrued some of the emptiest passing stats of anyone in the NFL not named Matt Stafford. I understand why Bear fans would be scared of the Vikings. As a GB fan I am decidedly not.