It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
City of Fools wrote:
they can't just bring back the same crew, can they? There have to be better practice squad players out there...I still think Bennett is the best reciever they have, and he barely sees the field.


If you're calling for practice squad players to save the day at this point, it speaks volumes about Angelo and the entire team. Also no offense, but it makes you look a bit ridiculous considering the team went 9-7.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
City of Fools wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
You could honestly say that Reggie Bush is a bust based on his expectations out of USC. Not only was he the greatest thing to come into the NFL since the facemask, he was also pegged to save an entire city.

And everyone thought Mario Williams was the new Sam Bowie. Turns out Williams is Alonzo Mourning and Reggie Bush is Christian Laettner

HEY! Lay off Laettner!

Nothing wrong with being wrongly selected but still being selected for THEE Dream Team, Hit the Biggest Shot in the history of College Basketball,get drafted 2nd overall and paid well, Smoke Weed every day, carve out a niche as the ass hole white guy, and eventually have enough money to BUY a team.

But Reggie might win on Kim Kardashians ass alone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
City of Fools wrote:
they can't just bring back the same crew, can they? There have to be better practice squad players out there...I still think Bennett is the best reciever they have, and he barely sees the field.


I don't think it will be the exact same crew, but I feel like it will be similar. I truly hope I am wrong.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
City of Fools wrote:
they can't just bring back the same crew, can they? .

Oh hell Yeah
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
BD wrote:
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
1) Angelo. Year after year of bad drafting.



Angelo. Year after year of bad drafting? Not fair. What are the NFL Draft success rates per round on average? I'd guess they look something like this:

1st round: 70%
2nd round: 50%
3rd round: 35%
4th round: 25%
5th round: 17%
6th round: 10%
7th round: 5%

Undrafted: 2%

If those are accurate, and I think they are pretty close, then if you take 7 draft picks as a whole, the average GM would have about a 30% overall success rate per draft. Reduce that figure to about 20-25% due to the fact that the average GM has multiple supplemental picks which tend to weight their overall draft to the later rounds (for instance, the Bears had five 7th round picks last year. With a 5% success rate, the odds were against them that any of them would make it in the NFL. On the whole, that means that the average NFL team should pull about 3 long term players per Draft (with supplemental picks, the average team has more than just 7 picks). The best teams would pull 4 consistently. An outstanding Draft would pull 5 players, which is still 50% or so failing. Bad Drafts would have 1-2 picks per Draft contribute.

Some like to judge by impact players, for example, saying over the past 5 years, the Bears have 4 "impact" players...Let's review the New England Patriots during the same time frame:

2008 - New England Patriots
Rd Sel #PlayerPositionSchool
1 10 Jerod Mayo OLB Tennessee
2 62 Terrence Wheatley CB Colorado
3 78 Shawn Crable OLB Michigan
3 94 Kevin O'Connell QB San Diego State
4 129 Jonathan Wilhite CB Auburn
5 153 Matt Slater WR UCLA
6 197 Bo Ruud LB Nebraska

In the 2008 Draft, they had 0 impact players. Mayo was a starter, but he had
0 sacks, 1 FF, and 0 INT's, which probably doesn't qualify him as an impact
guy, or you need to count Kevin Payne for the Bears. Other than Mayo, their
entire draft is garbage so far.

2007 - New England Patriots
Rd Sel # Player Position School
1 24 Brandon Meriweather DB Miami (Fla.)
4 127 Kareem Brown DT Miami (Fla.)
5 171 Clint Oldenburg T Colorado State
6 180 Justin Rogers LB Southern Methodist
6 202 Mike Richardson DB Notre Dame
6 208 Justise Hairston RB Central Connecticut State
6 209 Corey Hilliard OT Oklahoma State
7 211 Oscar Lua LB USC
7 247 Mike Elgin G Iowa

In 2007, Meriweather is an impact guy. He's a playmaker and a quality starter.
The rest of this draft is garbage.

2006 - New England Patriots
Rd Sel # Player Position School
1 21 Laurence Maroney RB Minnesota
2 36 Chad Jackson WR Florida
3 86 David Thomas TE Texas
4 106 Garrett Mills RB Tulsa
4 118 Stephen Gostkowski K Memphis
5 136 Ryan O'Callaghan T California
6 191 Jeremy Mincey LB Florida
6 205 Dan Stevenson G Notre Dame
6 206 Le Kevin Smith DT Nebraska
7 229 Willie Andrews CB Baylor

In 2006, the Patriots only impact guy is a 4th round Kicker. Maroney is yet
to have a season with over 900 yards or 7 TD's and is constantly injured. Chad
Jackson is a bust and the rest of this draft is garbage.

2005 - New England Patriots
Rd Sel # Player Position School
1 32 Logan Mankins G Fresno State
3 84 Ellis Hobbs CB Iowa State
3 100 Nick Kaczur T Toledo
4 133 James Sanders S AFFresno State
5 170 Ryan Claridge LB Nevada-Las Vegas
7 230 Matt Cassel QB USC
7 255 Andy Stokes TE William Penn

Basically the Patriots best Draft of the group. Mankins and Kaczur are both
starters, Hobbs is a quality player, and Matt Cassel has proved his worth. Overall
a good group. That being said, nearly 40% of this Draft is garbage with guys like
James Sanders, Ryan Claridge, and Andy Stokes.

2004 - New England Patriots
Rd Sel # Player Position School
1 21 Vince Wilfork NT Miami (Fla.)
1 32 Benjamin Watson TE Georgia
2 63 Marquise Hill DE Louisiana State
3 95 Guss Scott S Florida
4 113 Dexter Reid S North Carolina
4 128 Cedric Cobbs RB Arkansas
5 164 P.K. Sam WR Florida State
7 233 Christian Morton CB Illinois

Last Draft to be reviewed. Wilfork and Watson are good. The rest is garbage in this
group. Let's review their overall bust rate and then the number of quality players during
this time.

Bust Rate: Of the 41 players drafted, 9 guys panned out, one of which is a kicker and
another is a backup QB. That equates to an overall Draft bust rate of 78%. In other words,
about 22%, or 1/4 of the Patriots total draft picks actually pan out. I think we would all agree that
the Patriots front office is pretty solid. Are they just horrible drafters? No. This is the nature of the
NFL Draft.

Impact Players: They have four impact guys, one of which is a backup QB.

For the Bears, here are the guys drafted in the same timeframe that have started for the Chicago Bears for meaningful minutes:

I won't count Craig Krenzel or Cedric Benson, because starter or not, they were junk.

From there, you have Nathan Vasher, Bernard Berrian, Tank Johnson, Tommie Harris, Chris Harris, Kyle Orton, Mark Anderson, Dusty Dvoracek, Devin Hester, Danieal Manning, Trumaine McBride, Corey Graham, Kevin Payne, Josh Beekman, Greg Olsen, and Matt Forte. And we all know that Chris Williams will be a starter next year and was probably the starter this year barring injury.

Compare that to the Patriots Draft over the same period. I think when people say that Angelo cannot Draft, they don't really have a good understanding how the NFL Draft works or a realistic perspective of what a good Draft looks like.


It would be great if someone did a study on this.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Laettner was the third pick that year, not the second...Shaq was one, 'Zo was two...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Spaulding wrote:
I'm not sold on Orton. Why are you?

BTW your sausage was a little salty and didn't quite clear the bottom of the bowl. I have a voracious appetite, you got anything bigger?


I am never sold on a QB until I see two consecutive seasons of success. I chalk 3,000 yards, 18 TD's, and 12 INT's in a season of which the final 5-6 games, I believe, were adversely impacted by Orton's inability to push off of his plant ankle properly, as a success. Also, he should be given credit for toughing it out, when most experts thought he had a 2-3 week injury, knowing that if he missed the games, Grossman would be running the show and therefore, running our team into the ground. Kudos to Orton. One season down. One to go. That being said, with just a year left, I think there's a 70% chance they'll re-up him, primarily dependent on Orton's reasonability for terms.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Bob Babich and the entire defense was to blame for this season, with special teams getting an honorable mention. Both were to blame for losing the Atlanta game, which turns out to be the biggest loss of the season in terms of hindsight. Lovie deserves to be the head coach next season.


Bob Babich should be fired. Whether he will or not is another story. With a 9-7 record, I'm not sure there will be overwhelming pressure on the coaching staff since they basically overachieved. I think Angelo will basically tell Lovie to make the call, but know that he'll have to answer for it in 2009 if Babich blows again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
I'd put Spaulding on a plate and sop her up with a buttermilk biscut.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Okay BD - let's go back to 2002 with Bears picks:

From the 2008 draft, the belittled selected:

Rnd Name College
1 Chris Williams Vanderbilt
2 Matt Forte Tulane
3 Earl Bennett Vanderbilt
3 Marcus Harrison Arkansas
4 Craig Steltz Louisiana State
5 Zackary Bowman Nebraska
5 Kellen Davis Michigan State
7 Ervin Baldwin Michigan State
7 Chester Adams Georgia
7 Joey LaRocque Oregon State
7 Kirk Barton Ohio State
7 Marcus Monk Arkansas

Fealz' comments: Forte was a great pick - not so sure about the rest. We have to give this class a little longer.


2007
Rnd Name College Note
1 Greg Olsen Miami (Fla.)
2 Dan Bazuin Central Michigan
3 Garrett Wolfe Northern Illinois
3 Michael Okwo Stanford
4 Josh Beekman Boston College
5 Kevin Payne Louisiana-Monroe
5 Corey Graham New Hampshire
7 Trumaine McBride Mississippi
7 Aaron Brant Iowa State

Fealz' comments: Olsen shows signs of being a good tight end. Next four picks are wastes. Payne, Graham, McBride - that's the best we can do from this class?

2006
Rnd Name College Note
2 Danieal Manning Abilene Christian
2 Devin Hester Miami (FL)
3 Dusty Dvoracek Oklahoma
4 Jamar Williams Arizona State
5 Mark Anderson Alabama
6 J.D. Runnels Oklahoma
6 Tyler Reed Penn State

Fealz' comments: Manning's okay as a nickel, and showed some flashes as a returner. Hester - I think he's ruined (not sure it is his fault, however). Dvoracek is the defensive line version of Mike Brown, without the resume. Jamar Williams - what happened to him? Anderson dropped off the face of the earth, and Runnels and Reed? Bad class.

2005
Rnd Name College Note
1 Cedric Benson Texas
2 Mark Bradley Oklahoma
4 Kyle Orton Purdue
5 Airese Currie Clemson
6 Chris Harris Louisiana-Monroe
7 Rodriques Wilson South Carolina

Fealz' comments: Forget Benson? How can we? Bradley, Currie, and Wilson? Harris went on to better things elsewhere. Orton is still here - but hasn't shown much. Bad class.

2004
Rnd Name College Note
1 Tommie Harris Oklahoma
2 Terry Johnson Washington
3 Bernard Berrian Fresno State
4 Nathan Vasher Texas
4 Leon Joe Maryland
5 Claude Harriott Pittsburgh
5 Craig Krenzel Ohio State
7 Alfonso Marshall Miami (FL)

Fealz' comments: Tommie Harris - they handed him big money and he disappeared. We're all too familiar with Tank's problems. Berrian underperformed here. Vasher - looks like he's on his way out. Forget the last four picks. Bad class.

2003
Rnd Name College Note
1 Michael Haynes Penn State
1 Rex Grossman Florida
2 Charles Tillman Louisiana-Lafayette
3 Lance Briggs Arizona
4 Todd Johnson Florida
4 Ian Scott Florida
5 Bobby Wade Arizona
5 Justin Gage Missouri
5 Tron Lafavor Florida
6 Joe Odom Purdue
6 Brock Forsey Boise State
7 Bryan Anderson Pittsburgh

Fealz' comments: The first pick had a short career. The second one gave you six great games in six years. Tillman and Briggs were great picks. The rest, not so much. Best draft so far.

2002
Rnd Name College Note
1 Marc Colombo Boston College
3 Roosevelt Williams Tuskegee
3 Terrence Metcalf Mississippi
4 Alex Brown Florida
5 Bobby Gray Louisiana Tech
5 Bryan Knight Pittsburgh
6 Adrian Peterson Georgia Southern
6 Jamin Elliott Delaware
6 Bryan Fletcher UCLA

Fealz' comments: Oh, well...at least we picked up a lineman who is still with us and a special teamer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Is this year your first experience with American football Fealz? If so, welcome to the game!

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
No, but it is my first experience with anyone who has suggested Angelo is an average or better-than-average drafter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
No, but it is my first experience with anyone who has suggested Angelo is an average or better-than-average drafter.


Really? I know several people of that opinion. I think he's at least average. He certainly is terrible at drafting offensive players, but his overall drafts havent been that bad I dont think. The Bears have certainly been an "average" team during his tenure, and I think their winning percentage under him is the best its been under any GM in quite some time.

IB - You can make a point without coming off that condescending.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
No he can't. He needs practice for the courtroom :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
No, but it is my first experience with anyone who has suggested Angelo is an average or better-than-average drafter.


Angelo has not been great as a drafter. He's clearly better on defense than offense, but to say he's been horrible at drafting (if that's where you are going with this) is just wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
I'm willing to have a civil conversation with anyone about the NFL that has even a semblance of football knowledge. 90% of the people in this board fit into that category. Even Frank. :P

However, I'm sick of the Buffone and O'Bradovich mentality. It's stupid and ill-informed. If you have some numbers you can point to, or some valid comparison you can make, then that gets us somewhere. But if the best you can do is gems like "Tommie Harris - they handed him big money and he disappeared." (which isn't remotely true if you watched any of the games in the 2nd half, and Harris was a pro bowl alternate), then there's no saving you. Pointing to a bunch of busts and saying "those players are bad" doesn't get us anywhere unless the rest of the NFL is reliably drafting studs in the late rounds.

I've posted a ton of numbers in the NFL section on a whole bunch of draft stuff. I'm interested in looking at that: not vague notions of how someone is doing or people's scouting impressions. If we're going to make broad, league-wide comparisons, then I want numbers and something much broader. I've have some rudiments of the study I'm doing over there. Those numbers say that Angelo was one of the top drafters between 2002-2005 (I stopped at 2005 becausemy stats only do through 2007, and two years seemed to short a time to judge the 2006 class.) The 2006-2008 drafts have yielded better offensive players, including Hester, Olsen, Forte, and the jury is still out on Williams. They also yielded a very good DT in Dvoracek, who has unfortunately been injury prone, a useful guard in Beekman, and a useful DT in Harrison. When I go and readjust the numbers, Angelo probably won't be dropping much, if at all.

I just think some people need to learn the definition of "average". It's much worse than they are accustomed to.

(None of this is directed at you. Welcome back buddy.)

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ive heard from a number of Bears fans I know Tommie has dropped off. It doesnt seem like it in the couple games Ive watched, but you cant really tell anything about DT's unless you are watching all the games, stats dont speak alot for a position like that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
FavreFan wrote:
Ive heard from a number of Bears fans I know Tommie has dropped off. It doesnt seem like it in the couple games Ive watched, but you cant really tell anything about DT's unless you are watching all the games, stats dont speak alot for a position like that.


He had a slow first half and looked like his old self in the second half. I think people need to be told whether linemen are playing well or not, and since the chattering heads are usually a few weeks behind, since they don't watch anything more than the highlights, they're still stuck in "Tommy Harris sucks" mode.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I thought Harris played better in the second half than the first but I thought he still disappeared at times and wasn't nearly as disruptive as consistently as he has been in the past.

But I thought he played well enough that he isn't a problem, per se.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:18 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
Okay BD - let's go back to 2002 with Bears picks:

From the 2008 draft, the belittled selected:

Rnd Name College
1 Chris Williams Vanderbilt
2 Matt Forte Tulane
3 Earl Bennett Vanderbilt
3 Marcus Harrison Arkansas
4 Craig Steltz Louisiana State
5 Zackary Bowman Nebraska
5 Kellen Davis Michigan State
7 Ervin Baldwin Michigan State
7 Chester Adams Georgia
7 Joey LaRocque Oregon State
7 Kirk Barton Ohio State
7 Marcus Monk Arkansas

Fealz' comments: Forte was a great pick - not so sure about the rest. We have to give this class a little longer.


2007
Rnd Name College Note
1 Greg Olsen Miami (Fla.)
2 Dan Bazuin Central Michigan
3 Garrett Wolfe Northern Illinois
3 Michael Okwo Stanford
4 Josh Beekman Boston College
5 Kevin Payne Louisiana-Monroe
5 Corey Graham New Hampshire
7 Trumaine McBride Mississippi
7 Aaron Brant Iowa State

Fealz' comments: Olsen shows signs of being a good tight end. Next four picks are wastes. Payne, Graham, McBride - that's the best we can do from this class?

2006
Rnd Name College Note
2 Danieal Manning Abilene Christian
2 Devin Hester Miami (FL)
3 Dusty Dvoracek Oklahoma
4 Jamar Williams Arizona State
5 Mark Anderson Alabama
6 J.D. Runnels Oklahoma
6 Tyler Reed Penn State

Fealz' comments: Manning's okay as a nickel, and showed some flashes as a returner. Hester - I think he's ruined (not sure it is his fault, however). Dvoracek is the defensive line version of Mike Brown, without the resume. Jamar Williams - what happened to him? Anderson dropped off the face of the earth, and Runnels and Reed? Bad class.

2005
Rnd Name College Note
1 Cedric Benson Texas
2 Mark Bradley Oklahoma
4 Kyle Orton Purdue
5 Airese Currie Clemson
6 Chris Harris Louisiana-Monroe
7 Rodriques Wilson South Carolina

Fealz' comments: Forget Benson? How can we? Bradley, Currie, and Wilson? Harris went on to better things elsewhere. Orton is still here - but hasn't shown much. Bad class.

2004
Rnd Name College Note
1 Tommie Harris Oklahoma
2 Terry Johnson Washington
3 Bernard Berrian Fresno State
4 Nathan Vasher Texas
4 Leon Joe Maryland
5 Claude Harriott Pittsburgh
5 Craig Krenzel Ohio State
7 Alfonso Marshall Miami (FL)

Fealz' comments: Tommie Harris - they handed him big money and he disappeared. We're all too familiar with Tank's problems. Berrian underperformed here. Vasher - looks like he's on his way out. Forget the last four picks. Bad class.

2003
Rnd Name College Note
1 Michael Haynes Penn State
1 Rex Grossman Florida
2 Charles Tillman Louisiana-Lafayette
3 Lance Briggs Arizona
4 Todd Johnson Florida
4 Ian Scott Florida
5 Bobby Wade Arizona
5 Justin Gage Missouri
5 Tron Lafavor Florida
6 Joe Odom Purdue
6 Brock Forsey Boise State
7 Bryan Anderson Pittsburgh

Fealz' comments: The first pick had a short career. The second one gave you six great games in six years. Tillman and Briggs were great picks. The rest, not so much. Best draft so far.

2002
Rnd Name College Note
1 Marc Colombo Boston College
3 Roosevelt Williams Tuskegee
3 Terrence Metcalf Mississippi
4 Alex Brown Florida
5 Bobby Gray Louisiana Tech
5 Bryan Knight Pittsburgh
6 Adrian Peterson Georgia Southern
6 Jamin Elliott Delaware
6 Bryan Fletcher UCLA

Fealz' comments: Oh, well...at least we picked up a lineman who is still with us and a special teamer.


What am I evaluating? Is there any doubt that this group has more Pro Bowlers and more starters in it than the New England Patriots over the same period? What are you proving? Again, this gets back to your lack of realistic expectations on the NFL Draft. About 20-25% of NFL Draft picks turn into quality players. You have to expect a 70-80% bust rate for NFL teams. Look at New England. Over the same period, New England, arguably the most dominant team this decade, had a nearly 80% bust rate for their draft picks.

So what are we evaluating here? Pick five teams are random and then let's compare our performance to their performance in the Draft. That is how you analyze one's ability to Draft with a sense of perspective. If you go into it with the idea that you need to hit on all of your players, all NFL GM's would suck. Its like looking at MLB players and saying the entire Cubs and Sox lineups suck because they average a .280 batting average. So if they fail 72% of the time, then they must suck. If you didn't know anything about baseball and you didn't know what other teams batting averages looked like, failing 72% of the time looks pretty bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
newper wrote:
spanky wrote:
3. Mike Brown: Hurt again.

I don't mind you bringing this up as a problem, but do you really think it is Mike Brown's fault that he gets hurt a lot? It is either the trainers' fault for not having him in better condition, or the coaches' fault for not having an adequate replacement ready (or the gods' fault for injuring him so often, but you best not pick a fight against the gods for this.)

Depends on what your answer to the following is:

Replace Mike Brown's name w/ Kerry Wood and let me know what you think then. "Fault" may be the wrong word, but you still can't rely on him.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
My problem with this defense and the whole team IMO is, unless I totally misunderstand it, they don't want to be great. They say they are/want to be great but the defensive philosophy as I understand it is - don't give up big plays, yards don't matter, if you make the offense work long enough they will make a mistake and turn the ball over.

That's not a "great" defense philosophy. That's an "effective" defense philosophy of sorts. And while it has been effective in the past at times, there have been other times that they allow the O to pick and pick and never stop them, never get the turnovers and bad teams beat them.

I'm going to go all "meatball" here but I would much rather see a defense that wants to shut down the offense completely, get them off the field, even if it means you give up the big play at times.

Maybe I've got it all wrong but that's what I see from this defense. The coaching mentality of "we'll be fine" bleeds through in all aspects of the team too. There's rarely a sense of urgency in any aspect of this team because "we'll get the turnovers" or "the defense will score" or "special teams will make it up", etc. That comes from the coach's mentality. I don't care if he yells or grabs a facemask and shakes it but I do care that the philosophy lacks the urgency of the moment and that is what I think the fans are craving, not the yelling so much (COAAATTCHHHH!!!).

Anyway, rant over. I'm not saying Lovie is a bad coach but that I just personally don't like the philosophy of this team and makes it frustrating to watch.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
My man!!!! You can sit on my pile of spagetti.

Except think he is a bad coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I love the Bears, but I'm glad they are done. Overall, this team did not deserve to get into the playoffs and if this isn't a kick in the ass of a wakeup call to Angelo, the coaching staff, and the players, fuck 'em. I've got better things to do with my Sundays.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
He's won too many football games for me to say he is bad. I just don't think he's a championship coach.

He got as close as I think he'll ever get in a season when the rest of the NFC sucked.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Lovie's inflexibility has a lot to do with this season's losses. We all know that Lovie doesn't like to make adjustments off his game plan. Look, first rule of war is that no battle plan survives first contact with the enemy. Neither should a game plan survive a full half of football. Last year no one seemed to understand that the Bears didn't have a running game. Everyone knew it except for the coaching staff.
Lovie forced out Rivera. And Rivera was a great coach. It's nice the Bears are willing to open the checkbook a little more for the on field talent than they had historically but coaching these expensive pieces properly is key. Lovie man-bitch wasn't a bad defensive co necesserally, but he wasn't the best option. To me that's an example of coaching costing games.
Lovie's squib kick call. His time outs at the end of the game. His dedication to the ground game.
Can someone explain to me exactly why Lovie was actually a GOOD head coach? Seems to me he'd have been better left as a d-co.
On further review of posts since I replied:
Doc, Baker won a bunch of games his first year with the cubs as well, won a lot of ball games. That doesn't make him a good manager. I firmly believe that this team won games, especially this year, in spite of the coaching.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:25 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I'm going to go all "meatball" here but I would much rather see a defense that wants to shut down the offense completely, get them off the field, even if it means you give up the big play at times.

Maybe I've got it all wrong but that's what I see from this defense. The coaching mentality of "we'll be fine" bleeds through in all aspects of the team too. There's rarely a sense of urgency in any aspect of this team because "we'll get the turnovers" or "the defense will score" or "special teams will make it up", etc. That comes from the coach's mentality. I don't care if he yells or grabs a facemask and shakes it but I do care that the philosophy lacks the urgency of the moment and that is what I think the fans are craving, not the yelling so much (COAAATTCHHHH!!!).
.


I think Dr. just created the actual definition of "Bears Football"

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Also, this is why they "Never show up" in the big games. They are not used to playing "to win". That's not their philosophy. They are playing "not to lose/let the other team lose" at all times.

So, they always look like they're not ready to play because they are not a shutdown defense and they don't go for big plays on offense. A team will immediately start putting up yards on them and if they don't get the turnover it looks like they came out flat.

They don't dominate anybody and it's not their philosophy, necessarily, to do so.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:27 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Lovie definitely has his faults, but overall he is a solid coach. He's done more with this team than any other coach in Chicago since Ditka, and with arguably weaker players (at least on offense) than Ditka had.

With that being said, they should fire Babich, hire Marinelli, and focus on building up a stronger offensive line. Like it or not, Orton is your QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I'm not sure I want Marnelli here.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group